A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 25583
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 2, 2016 AT 2:38 PM

John Read says:

Yes, but realistically, either Trump or Hillary is going to be President.

As far as I can tell, Tulsi, an admirable candidate in many ways, seems to have no interest in running for President at this time.

So in 2016, a vote for Tulsi is a wasted vote.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/w ... ent-143727

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 25583
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 2, 2016 AT 9:20 PM

Paul Plante says:

A wasted vote?

Not hardly, John Read.

Study your American history, John Read.

It is called a CITIZEN’S DRAFT!

The citizens call to the Oval Office the candidate the citizens want in the White House as someone they can trust to fulfill the duties of the president.

Remember your American history, John Read.

That is how George Washington came to be president of the United States of America.

Like Tulsi Gabbard, John Read, George Washington did not ask the American people to make him their leader.

Clearly, John Read, someone who is as rational, intelligent, well-prepared, and poised and politically astute as you are would recall that, so I find myself very surprised and amazed that you don’t see the trap you are placing not only yourself in, but the nation you love and cherish as well, by doubting the efficacy of the same CITIZEN’S DRAFT this time around, which is what the write-in vote in actuality is, at a time when it has never been needed more.

I believe that it is in the character of Tulsi Gabbard that if the people of the United States of America call her to serve as their next president, that Tulsi Gabbard would answer that call and serve with distinction as this nation’s next president.

Think about it, John Read.

From her record of public speaking, it is clear she cares deeply for this nation, its future, its national security, and its people.

So why would she decline their call to serve, especially when she voluntarily joined this nation’s military in a time of war?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/w ... ent-143727

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 25583
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 3, 2016 AT 10:29 PM

Paul Plante says:

Not surprisingly, I don’t agree with John Read that it is a given that either Trump or Hillary is going to be President.

Yes, there is a likelihood one of them might be president, God help the nation, but not a certainty.

If the Bernie supporters had the courage of their convictions, for example, they would send a very strong message to the Democrat party that shut them out by rejecting Hillary Clinton and instead, voting for Bernie Sanders by write-in.

And according to Marketwatch today, in an article by Robert Schroeder published Oct 3, 2016, there is a new wild card in the deck by the name of Evan McMullin, who, according to the article, said he could “no longer stand on the sidelines” of the presidential race and decided to challenge Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump for the White House.

McMullin, a former Goldman Sachs banker who also happens to be a former Central Intelligence Agency operative, said he’d hoped this year to see nominees who could offer visions of a better future, as did we all, or well, most of us anyway, those of us who are not besotted from drinking too much Democrat and Republican Kool-Aid.

So, according to Marketwatch, the 40-year-old Utah native, who’s running as an independent, calls Clinton, who emerged from her near-fatal bout with killer pneumonia with an entirely new, very demure voice to replace that old hag-like hectoring voice she was using before pneumonia almost carried her off in its deathly grip, “a corrupt career politician,” which is the truth, and has similarly harsh words for GOP nominee Trump, who after the faux “debate” now has people up this way totally convinced that the Clinton Foundation is paying Donald Trump to run against Hillary Clinton as a favor to the Clintons, with some kind of big pay-back for the Donald down the road in the form of government grants and tax breaks to build more casinos here in America, because the only one in America who can make Hillary Clinton look presidential is a fool like Donald Trump, who people are convinced is going out of his way to look stupid so he can make Hillary look good by comparison.

According to Marketwatch, McMullin is stopping by MarketWatch’s office in New York on Tuesday, and he’ll answer your questions about his campaign and the economic issues at stake in the election live on Facebook at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Tuesday.

So this race is far from over, people.

Will history be made this year?

Will the Democrat and Republican parties finally be consigned to the dustbin of history along with the Whigs, where they belong.

Stay tuned is all I can say.

In the meantime, I’m still going to vote my own conscience here by writing in Tulsi Gabbard for president and Chris Gibson for vice president, as I want someone sane and rational in the White House for a change as opposed to another shallow-thinking incompetent.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/w ... ent-143727

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 25583
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR APRIL 24, 2019 AT 5:14 PM

Paul Plante says:

And speaking of the seemingly perpetual WTF moment I seem to be immersed in here in America, if it really is America, and not some Never-Never Land, in yet another cosmic confluence as this Mullet, er, sorry, I don’t know why I keep getting typos on that, Mueller Report has come out, we have none other than Hillary Clinton herself hysterically and shrilly shrieking in TIME article entitled “Hillary Clinton: Anyone Else Would Have Been Indicted After Mueller Report” on 23 April 2019 as follows:

Hillary Rodham Clinton says she agrees with those who argue that Russian meddling cost her the 2016 election and that President Donald Trump has obstructed justice in covering up his campaign’s interactions with a foreign adversary.

Clinton said Trump’s actions would only embolden future adversaries and weaken American democracy.

“What you’re saying is we were attacked, we have significant evidence that this Administration did everything it could to undermine and interfere with the investigation into that act.”

“And we are going to walk away and pretend it didn’t happen?” Clinton said.

“Well, at that point, then you might as well just say all bets are off, there is no accountability for anyone in the most significant job in the world.”

“I don’t think that’s the right place to end up.”

“This is about what is going on today and the threats to our next election, to our defense as a nation,” Clinton said.

“I’m really of the mind that the Mueller report is part of the beginning.”

“It’s not the end.”

“… There’s still so much more that we should know and that we should act upon.”

end quotes

And the cosmic confluence includes this thread in the venerable Cape Charles Mirror which transports us back in time to SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 AT 5:18 PM, where we have this essential background to refute the silly claims of Hillary Clinton, who I think has become unhinged due to the continued stress of being Hillary Clinton as opposed to just a normal human being like the rest of us, that Russian “meddling” cost her the 2016 election and that President Donald Trump has obstructed justice in covering up his campaign’s interactions with a foreign adversary, to wit:

With respect to the surreal and bizarre nature of this up-coming presidential election, for the first time in American political history, we have two candidates running for the imperial presidency on behalf of the two supposedly “major” political factions in this nation, both of which now represent a shrinking minority of voters in this country, and both candidates are highly disliked and reviled by a majority of voters in this country, as we are informed by the Washington Post on 31 August 2016, as follows:

* A new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows 41 percent of Americans have a favorable impression of Clinton, while 56 percent have an unfavorable one.

* That’s the worst image Clinton has had in her quarter-century in national public life.

* Her previous low favorable rating this year was in July, when it was 42 percent, lower than any mark in historical Post-ABC polls except a few points in the 1990s when a large share of the public had no opinion of her.

* Her previous high for unfavorable views was in June, when 55 percent disliked Clinton.

* If it weren’t for Trump, in fact, Clinton would be the most unpopular major-party presidential nominee in modern American history.

* Perhaps most notably, Clinton’s image has declined significantly from just a month ago.

* Interestingly, Clinton’s numbers appear to have dropped since that early August poll mostly in groups that have been very supportive of her:

* Her favorable rating among women dropped from 54 percent to just 45 percent.

* Among Hispanics, it went from 71 percent to 55 percent.

* Among liberals, it went from 76 percent to 63 percent.

end quotes

Now, today, almost three years later, Hillary is saying that ALL of that is the result and fault of “Russian Meddling,” which I think is pure horse****.

It did not take the Russians to make all of those American people revile Hillary – that credit goes to her, and her alone, as we see by going further into this thread from yesterday, to wit:

In a MARKETWATCH article by Caroline Baum on August 3, 2016, we are informed thusly about Hillary Clinton, who is reviled by a clear majority of American citizens, and with good reason, in my estimation:

Hillary Clinton has a long history of lying.

In fact, her first instinct, when confronted with some tawdry, quasi-illegal activity, is to dissemble.

In 1996, New York Times columnist William Safire called her “a congenital liar,” citing her comments about her cattle-trading windfall, her involvement in the firing of members of the White House Travel Office, and the missing Rose Law Firm files that miraculously reappeared.

Most recently, Clinton’s denials about sending classified information on her private email account housed on her private server were exposed as falsehoods by FBI Director James Comey.

Asked by Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday” about Comey’s comments, the former secretary of state lied again, claiming Comey had called her statements “truthful.”

The Washington Post’s FactChecker awarded Clinton four Pinocchios, a rating reserved for the biggest whoppers, prompting the Atlantic’s Ron Fournier to write an article headlined, “Why Can’t Hillary Clinton Stop Lying?”

end quotes

But again, hey, it’s the ******* Russians, people – Hillary really wasn’t a congential liar at all – it was the Russians who made those people say those bad things about Hillary, who is as pure, or actually even more pure, than the driven snow, which again takes us back to 2016, as follows:

The question, however, is not so much one of why can’t Hillary Clinton stop lying as it is one of who in America in their right mind wants to have as their leader someone who can’t stop lying.

How low does one’s self-esteem have to be to want to live in a nation with a highly unpopular congenital liar who despises the majority of people in this country and dumps them into her “BASKET OF DEPLORABLES,” as if they were trash, as its chief executive officer and commander-in-chief of its military?

end quotes

Now, that we me saying that, and I am no stinking Russian agent or Russian spy or Russian tool – to the contrary, I AM AN AMERICAN, Hillary, and I am older than you, and I am past being sick and tired of all your ******* lies and horse****, which again takes us back to 2017 as follows:

With respect to the question of Hillary Clinton’s veracity, in a NEWSMAX article by Brian Freeman on 07 August 2016, we are informed as follows with respect to Hillary Clinton’s claims about creating jobs in the United States of America, to wit:

Even though Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton touts her accomplishments at job creation as a New York senator, the actual results of her efforts are far from impressive, according to The Washington Post.

The paper conducted an in-depth review of her job-creation efforts while in the Senate, when she concentrated on trying to revive the economy in the depressed region of Upstate New York.

One of the major issues in the presidential election is expected to be who is most capable of running the economy and who has the best record of helping to stimulate growth.

In fact, First Post reported that during this past week of campaigning, Clinton said her economic plan for if she becomes president would create 10 million jobs, while that of Republican nominee Donald Trump would lose 3.5 million jobs, emphasizing that he is not offering “real change” but “empty promises.”

In her campaign for the Senate, Clinton also made grand promises, vowing to create 200,000 new jobs in Upstate New York, but the results fall well short of that, according to The Washington Post study.

Her attempts to pass major legislation to benefit the economy of her state failed and her smaller projects often were short-lived or did not work out at all, with overall job growth stagnate during her tenure, while manufacturing jobs plummeted 25 percent.

With that in mind, the most reliable figures are those from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, which show that during her overall time as senator, upstate jobs rose only 0.2 percent overall, while manufacturing positions fell 24.1 percent.

Some of the new jobs, however, appeared to have been created by legislation that was introduced by a Republican senator and only included Clinton as one of 21 co-sponsors, the study shows.

end quotes

And again, Hillary will shriek and screech that it was really the Russians saying all those mean things about her, and they can’t be true, because the Russians made up all that stuff to put Trump in the White House, because they already own him, and by gosh, the Mullet, er, gee, sorry, Mueller Report backs her up in spades, which is more horse****, which again takes us back to 2016 as follows:

In New York state, we know Hillary Clinton to be pro-repression when it comes to dissent against government corruption, and pro-government corruption when it comes to her policies.

We also know her to be quite a bit less than truthful, and thus are amazed that she is a leading contender for this highest government position in this land.

end quotes

And that is why Hillary is a LOSER!

If she wants to blame the Russians for that, so be it!

And God bless America for that favor.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/w ... ent-143727

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 25583
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR APRIL 26, 2019 AT 6:49 PM

Paul Plante says:

And in the light of the reality that all of us who are not Hillary Clinton live in, let’s go back for a moment to that TIME article entitled “Hillary Clinton: Anyone Else Would Have Been Indicted After Mueller Report” on 23 April 2019 where we have this ridiculous statement from Hillary, as follows:

Hillary Rodham Clinton says she agrees with those who argue that Russian meddling cost her the 2016 election and that President Donald Trump has obstructed justice in covering up his campaign’s interactions with a foreign adversary.

end quotes

That statement that Hillary Rodham Clinton says she agrees with those who argue that Russian meddling cost her the 2016 election is ridiculous because it was Hillary who was making that claim, and then the Democrats jumped on that same bandwagon along with the Washington Post, and the rest is now history, as we can see by going back to a Los Angeles Times article entitled “Clinton blames the FBI, Russia, WikiLeaks and also herself for 2016 loss” by Evan Halper on May 2, 2017, as follows:

Hillary Clinton on Tuesday took some responsibility for her historic loss in the presidential election, but mostly blamed a conspiracy against her.

end quotes

And my goodness, people, of course it has to be a SHUDDER SHUDDER “grand conspiracy,” precisely because she is the only Hillary Clinton we have in America, or the world, for that matter, and people are just jealous of her, and so for that reason, they all ganged up on her in a grand conspiracy to give the job to Trump, instead, as we see from the LA Times article as follows:

“If the election had been on Oct. 27, I would be your president,” Clinton said at the Women for Women event in New York.

end quotes

So, the takeaway there is that Hillary got screwed over, because the actual day of the election was designed to favor Trump, instead of her, and that was the fault of the Russians, and their tool, Jim Comey, as we see by going back to the LA Times article as follows:

But she said FBI director James Comey’s letter to Congress announcing that he had reopened his investigation into Clinton’s email practices, combined with the damage Russian hackers inflicted through their disclosure of campaign emails, raised just enough doubt in the minds of voters to cost her the election.

end quotes

And personally, I think that is just a load of horse**** from Hillary, because if there was a balance to be tipped, it had already been tipped years before, which takes us again to the LA Times, as follow:.

Clinton’s refusal to take full responsibility for her loss comes after a flurry of post-election critiques concluded the campaign she ran was deeply flawed, neglecting key groups of voters and failing to project a compelling message.

end quotes

And today, almost two years later to the day, Hillary’s refusal to take full responsibility for her loss has resulted in this Mullet, no, that’s not right, Mueller Report as a white wash to shift the blame elsewhere so Hillary can continue with her illusion that she really would have been president if only the election had been on a different date, which again takes us back to the LA Times, as follows:

Critics, including some Democrats, also charge Clinton brought the e-mail troubles on herself by setting up a private server in her home on which to conduct confidential government business.

end quotes

Of course, there is nothing about that in the Mullet, why does that keep happening, must be my spell checker stepping in, Mueller Report, because this is America and Hillary Clinton is a symbol of all that is pure and holy in America, and so, we can’t think bad things about Hillary, which takes us back to this from the LA Times, as follows

“It wasn’t a perfect campaign, there is no such thing,” Clinton said, promising to reflect on her mistakes in an upcoming book she joked will be a “confession” and “request for absolution.”

“But I was on the way to winning until the combination of Jim Comey’s letter on Oct. 28th and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off,” Clinton said.

“There was a lot of funny business going on.”

end quotes

Hillary, take it from me – you were never on the way to winning, except in your own mind – to the contrary, you were on the way to losing when you announced you were going to run again after being rejected before for the same reasons you were rejected this time, and Comey and the Russians had nothing at all to do with that, since you were losing on your own merits and didn’t need their help, so lay off with the lame excuses, Hillary.

And now for a word from our sponsors as we pause for station identification.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/w ... ent-143451

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 25583
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: A PASSION PLAY NAMED HILLARY CLINTON

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR APRIL 27, 2019 AT 6:46 PM

Paul Plante says:

And while we are on all the silly screeching and mewling Hillary Clinton is doing now that this Mullet, stop that, spellchecker, Mueller report is in, let’s go to a Bloomberg article entitled “Hillary Clinton says Congress should begin Watergate-style hearings after Mueller findings” by Margaret Talev on 24 April 2019, for some classic Hillary, as follows:

WASHINGTON — Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton said Congress should begin a Watergate-style investigation into President Donald Trump’s attempts to obstruct Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election that she lost.

end quotes

BOO HOO HOO, Hillary – you lost an election because you are Hillary Clinton and people in America cannot stand you because you think you are so perfect and everyone else can’t be because they are not you, so now the world has to be turned upside down on your behalf so you can have some scapegoats, because you have political power to make all of these witch hunts happen simply so you can blame somebody else for your loss, which takes us back to Bloomberg as follows:

Clinton wrote in a Washington Post op-ed that lawmakers should undertake “substantive hearings” on the special counsel’s report from his investigation and shouldn’t “jump straight to an up-or-down vote on impeachment.”

end quotes

And there is where we find ourselves in complete agreement, Hillary – yes, Congress now needs to go back to that Trump Tower meeting where Natalia Veselnitskaya, a former Russian prosecutor, raised allegations that Clinton and the Democratic National Committee benefited from dirty Russian money, which revelations and evidence in turn scared the living **** out of Trump Jr. who let us face it, is not made of the stern stuff of a hero, and doesn’t want his name associated in any way with making that evidence public, knowing only too well what would happen to him if he became a “rat,” and it needs to get those records, and it then needs to make them public in order to bring this sick show to an end, and if Hillary has to go to prison for laundering money with Russia, so what, she deserves it, which statement whisks us back in time to a necessary background article from Marketwatch entitled “Opinion: The race for the White House enters an alternate universe” by Darrell Delamaide published June 28, 2016, where we have as follows:

WASHINGTON – It’s not just you.

This presidential campaign truly has an air of unreality about it, like something out of the Twilight Zone.

end quotes

That was almost three years ago now, and three years later, especially now that the Mullet, I said stop that spellchecker, Mueller Report is out, it still has an air of unreality about it, like something out of the Twilight Zone, that thanks to Clinton Democrat and master political conjurer Lanny Davis, who may well be the real author of the famous Mullet, cross that out, Mueller Report, what takes us back to 2016 and the beginning of this sick Hillary Clinton saga as follows:

The candidates, the pundits and the media in general seem increasingly detached from the real world we live in as a campaign of taunts and insults replaces real debate on issues.

end quotes

And almost three years later, Hillary, the pundits and the media, and especially the Washington Post, are even more detached from reality, which takes us back to 2016 and Hillary’s specious claims that she would have been president but for the Russians and their tool Comey, to wit:

The first woman to clinch the presidential nomination of a major party has no bigger message than to bad-mouth the white male running against her.

A progressive champion who rocketed to popularity for her trenchant criticism of the financial industry and other consumer scammers now has become the name-caller-in-chief for an establishment politician she has in the past vilified as a tool of Wall Street.

The press calls this display of mudslinging by two Democratic women “electrifying,” an adjective generally absent from their coverage of equally enthusiastic rallies with Donald Trump.

Let’s stipulate for a moment that presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump is a really flawed individual, riven by deep-seated insecurities, and apparently a pathological liar.

It’s a description that would fit, say, Richard Nixon or Lyndon Johnson to a T as well – presidents who for all their flaws have some major accomplishments to their credit.

If we concede all this, however, then we have to concede that presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, too, is a really flawed individual, riven by deep-seated insecurities, and apparently a pathological liar.

So it’s hard to figure out just what Clinton and her new enabler, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, hope to accomplish with their mudslinging tirades against Trump, such as the one they engaged in on Monday in their first campaign appearance on the same stage.

Warren repeated her cliché-ridden description of Trump as a “small, insecure money grubber.”

For good measure, she added that he is “a thin-skinned bully” and “a nasty man” who would “crush you into the dirt to get whatever he wants.”

Clinton played her usual campaign trick of repeating statements long since clarified or “walked back,” taking them out of context and putting a spin on them that was never intended.

For instance, Trump never said he would default on U.S. debt, even though some inartful remarks were construed to mean such by people who understand less about finance than he does.

But this remains part of Clinton’s litany of disdain for the real-estate mogul, just as she continued to accuse Sanders of wanting to throw out Obamacare and every other government health-care program even though that grossly mischaracterized his plans.

Now, instead of nodding like a bobblehead just at the wisdom of her own remarks, as Clinton is wont to do, she’s happy to stand next to Warren and bobble along in approval as the Massachusetts senator preaches to the choir of Clinton supporters who already hate Trump.

And Trump is the only one to blame for creating a climate of hate and division in our politics?

The Clinton campaign apparently feels they are on the right track with their unremitting attacks on Trump.

But it’s a bit hypocritical to criticize him for fostering division and running on insults when doing the same yourself.

Welcome to the alternate universe that is the 2016 presidential campaign.

end quotes

And there is why Hillary Clinton lost, people – because she never had anything to offer America beyond her endlessly running mouth offering insult after insult about people who get up in the morning, go to work, pay their bills and raise their families because those people would not fall for Hillary’s bull****, so they became the BASKET OF DEPLORABLES who did vote to keep her out of the White House and I am proud to say that I am one of them who did MY COUNTRY a favor by denying Hillary Clinton my precious vote.

So let’s finally cut this endless spew of bull**** that the Russians had anything to do with keeping Hillary Clinton out of office as president - that is something she alone deserves the credit for, so let’s make sure she gets it.

And now, it’s time to take a break for station identification and a word from our sponsors!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/w ... ent-143727

Post Reply