Just musings, is all

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 21, 2021 at 10:31 pm

Paul Plante says:

“Our further success is to convince more of the American people to trust in our democratic system.”

That, as we have already seen was BIG DOG DEMOCRAT Nancy Pelosi speaking on the public record in the article in THE HILL entitled “Pelosi sets up call on election challenge: ‘No situation matches Trump presidency’” by Joseph Choi on 01/03/21, THREE DAYS BEFORE the events of 6 January 2021.

So when Nancy was talking about convincing more of the American people to trust in “our democratic system” on 3 January 2021, who was it she was really talking to?

And as an aside, I always find it quite interesting how these scribes in the main-stream media who exist to take down and regurgitate what horse crap hack politicians like Nancy Pelosi spew forth with never stop to ask people like Nancy what it was they just said as when they talk about convincing more of the American people to trust in “our democratic system.”

WHAT DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM?

And who exactly are they trying to get to trust in it?

And WHY?

What can possibly be trustworthy with any system Nancy Pelosi is involved with, given that she is selling her version of “democracy” to the highest bidders as we see from this Tribune Washington Bureau article entitled “Embattled Pelosi’s big survival weapon: money” by Anshu Siripurapu on 6/22/2017, as follows:

WASHINGTON — Here’s a huge reason Nancy Pelosi maintains her iron grip on House Democrats, even after another bruising — and in many party circles embarrassing — election loss: her ability to raise lots and lots of money.

The House Democratic leader has few current peers when it comes to pumping money into colleagues’ campaigns.

No other potential up-and-coming Democratic challenger to her leadership comes close.

Since 1990, she’s raised more than $9.2 million for party candidates, including $739,000 in the 2016 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks contributions from candidate committees and affiliated PACs.

Pelosi’s office claims even loftier triumphs, saying she’s raised more than $500 million for Democrats since entering the party leadership in the early 2000s, including $141.5 million in the 2015-2016 cycle.

The totals, her office says, include money raised for the party not directly controlled by her committees.

Big donors to the party’s congressional campaign committee were also available to Pelosi through her “Speaker’s Cabinet” program, which gave them special access to the Democratic leader.

end quotes

So in a word, the “democracy” of Nancy Pelosi is a crock of ****!

So who then are the people Nancy is talking about or referring to when she said on 3 January 2021 “Our further success is to convince more of the American people to trust in our democratic system.”

Crooked people?

People without brains who are unable think?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-328580

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 24, 2021 at 10:13 pm

Paul Plante says:

So, yes, indeed, people, making it up as they go, and very dangerously so, and here I am bringing us back to pretty much the present moment, forty-seven (47) days AFTER the very slick and very well-orchestrated 6 January 2021 COUP that felled our Constitution with a single hammer blow and replaced it with a Marxist democracy of the oppressed classes in America now being in control of the national government and national treasury, and an article in The Independent entitled “Garland says laws must be ‘fairly and faithfully enforced,'” which makes him sound like he is running for president, via AP news wire on 21 February 2021, where we have as follows:

President Joe Biden’s nominee for attorney general says the Justice Department must ensure laws are “fairly and faithfully enforced” and the rights of all Americans are protected, while reaffirming an adherence to policies to protect the department’s political independence.

Judge Merrick Garland who is set to appear Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, plans to tell senators that the attorney general must act as a lawyer for the people of the United States, not for the president.

end quotes

Which is just plain ******** ignorant and stupid, federal judge Merrick Garland telling senators that the attorney general must act as a lawyer for the people of the United States, not for the president, unless of course, as a federal judge and Obama Democrat, Merrick Garland can just make up this **** in his head regardless of what might happen to be written down as law, and whatever he says is what the law is, as opposed to what is written.

As to what is actually written about the position and duties of the United States Attorney General, and you would have thought a real slick Harvard law school grad who is a federal appeals court judge would have been all over this, given it is high school stuff, let’s simply go to the Department of Justice website, where we have as follows:

The United States Department of Justice

Organization, Mission & Functions Manual: Attorney General, Deputy and Associate

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

The position of Attorney General was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789.

In June 1870 Congress enacted a law entitled “An Act to Establish the Department of Justice.”

This Act established the Attorney General as head of the Department of Justice and gave the Attorney General direction and control of U.S. Attorneys and all other counsel employed on behalf of the United States.

The Act also vested in the Attorney General supervisory power over the accounts of U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

The mission of the Office of the Attorney General is to supervise and direct the administration and operation of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Bureau of Prisons, Office of Justice Programs, and the U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals Service, which are all within the Department of Justice.

The principal duties of the Attorney General are to:

* Represent the United States in legal matters.

* Supervise and direct the administration and operation of the offices, boards, divisions, and bureaus that comprise the Department.

* Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the President and the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.

* Make recommendations to the President concerning appointments to federal judicial positions and to positions within the Department, including U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

* Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate.

* Perform or supervise the performance of other duties required by statute or Executive Order.

end quotes

So, a high school civics question here: IF according to written law, the duty of the United States Attorney General is to furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the President as provided by law, then how exactly is it that as Biden’s attorney general, Merrick Garland is going to act as a lawyer for the people of the United States, and not for the president?

And how the hell does this even happen, that we are having people like this Merrick Garland, who is obviously an uninformed idiot, at best, being appointed to high government offices when they don’t know a ******* thing about the offices they are being appointed to, like Merrick Garland who appears delusional and thinks that as attorney general, he is going to to act as lawyer for the people, instead of the president of the United States of America, given that if we go back to the Justice Department site under the heading “The Role of the United States Attorney,” we find thusly:

The United States Attorney does not act as an attorney for individuals in their private legal affairs or lawsuits.

end quotes

What is incredible is that not one single senator seems to have confronted him on those statements, which raises the question of whether a single one of those morons knows the difference him or herself.

So, as as a lawyer for the people of the United States, and not for the president, people, what can each of us expect Merrick Garland to do for us?

Is Merrick Garland going to be the lawyer for each and every one of us, all at the same time?

In that case, what is he going to do if one of us sues another of us in court for assault?

Is he going to be the lawyer for both of us at the same time?

Or is he going to take sides?

And what if the person being sued for assault is a DEMOCRAT while the person doing the suing is not?

What then?

Will Merrick Garland go against the DEMOCRAT?

Getting back to that story, it continues as follows, to wit:

“It is a fitting time to reaffirm that the role of the attorney general is to serve the Rule of Law and to ensure equal justice under the law,” Garland says in his prepared statement.

end quotes

Now, as can be clearly seen from the following correspondence to U.S. Congressman Antonio Delgado, I would be among the very first in this nation to agree that this is indeed a fitting time to reaffirm that the role of the attorney general is to serve the Rule of Law and to ensure equal justice under the law, to wit:

17 January 2021

U.S. Congressman Antonio Delgado
1007 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman:

As this new year begins, I hope it finds you well, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your confirmation in a May 22, 2020 e-mail to me from your regional representative Madison Wellman on the record and for the record the fact that with respect to my civil and human rights being stripped from me by the Town of Poestenkill in your Congressional District in retaliation for my having given evidence of endemic corruption in Poestenkill to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, there will be no aid or comfort coming my way from the federal government, which is something I was first informed of in early 1992 by an FBI agent named Tom Dauenhauer with whom I had been involved with in the Hobbs Act investigation of endemic public corruption in Poestenkill and Rensselaer County.

In that conversation with FBI agent Dauenhauer, which occurred on Broadway in Albany in front of the Post Office building where the FBI was at that time located, the FBI agent took pains to explain to me just how stupid I had been in trying to blow the whistle on public corruption in New York state, and since he was in a mood to teach, I figured I might as well stay for the whole lesson, which included a primer on how I was sold down the river by an assistant U.S. attorney named Barbara Cottrell, in exchange for her name being placed on a list of appointees to a federal judgeship, and how evidence I had provided of corruption in Rensselaer County and Poestenkill had been destroyed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

He then told me that he had been ordered to have no contact with me, and his advice to me at that point was quite explicit: I had very powerful political enemies in New York, and that as a result, I would be wisest if I would run somewhere far from here and go into hiding, because while I was still here, they would remain relentless in their efforts to do me harm in as public a manner as possible to make me an example to discourage anyone else who would think of doing as I dared to do, which was to blow the whistle on corruption in Rensselaer County and Poestenkill.

And my life has been made into a living hell ever since, because I am not a runner.

Thank you for confirming that that is not going to change for me in this lifetime if the federal government has any say in the matter.

As to your suggestion that I try working with the Town of Poestenkill for a solution, when it is the Town of Poestenkill that is engaged in retaliation against me to make my life a living hell, I would respond that that is quite impossible.

Respectfully,

Paul R. Plante, NYSPE

end quotes

Which brings us back to The Independent, as follows:

He highlights a key mission for the division: to protect the rights of all Americans and particularly the most vulnerable.

“That mission remains urgent because we do not yet have equal justice.”

end quotes

And as that 17 January 2021 correspondence from myself to the Congressman makes patently clear, we do not yet have equal justice in this country, not in spite of the Department of Justice, but because of the Department of Justice playing politics with our lives and determining who gets protection of law, and who doesn’t.

So is Merrick Garland going to step in here as my lawyer and rectify any of that?

Or is all that talk about equal justice just a lot of hot wind and blather given that the United States Department of Justice is a very political agency that does play politics based on who is in office to appoint an attorney general like Merrick Garland?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-329430

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 25, 2021 at 7:36 pm

Paul Plante says:

“The mutability of the laws of the States is found to be a serious evil.”

“The injustice of them has been so frequent and so flagrant as to alarm the most stedfast friends of Republicanism.”

That is future American president James Madison in a letter to Thomas Jefferson two hundred thirty-four (234) years ago on October 24, 1787, where “mutability” is defined as “liability or tendency to change,” so that on a day by day basis, one never knows what the law might be, and thus, cannot rationally and logically plan for any kind of future, never really knowing what that future might be, as we are witnessing right now as Joe Biden goes through everything Trump did with a meat-axe, and undoes it, as was just the case with Trump Executive Order 13967 of December 18, 2020, entitled “Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture.”

Not surprisingly, like his namesake Joe Stalin, who Joe Biden likes because Frank Roosevelt, as good a Democrat as Joe Biden really liked Joe Stalin and thought he represented the future, Joe Biden is into what is known in architectural circles as Brutalist architecture based on an autocratic belief that government buildings should project power of the ruler and thus inspire fear in the masses, whereas in Executive Order 13967 of December 18, 2020, Trump stated thusly, to wit:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose.

Societies have long recognized the importance of beautiful public architecture.

Ancient Greek and Roman public buildings were designed to be sturdy and useful, and also to beautify public spaces and inspire civic pride.

Throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, public architecture continued to serve these purposes.

The 1309 constitution of the City of Siena required that “[w]hoever rules the City must have the beauty of the City as his foremost preoccupation . . . because it must provide pride, honor, wealth, and growth to the Sienese citizens, as well as pleasure and happiness to visitors from abroad.”

Three centuries later, the great British Architect Sir Christopher Wren declared that “public buildings [are] the ornament of a country.”

“[Architecture] establishes a Nation, draws people and commerce, makes the people love their native country . . . Architecture aims at eternity[.]”

Notable Founding Fathers agreed with these assessments and attached great importance to Federal civic architecture.

They wanted America’s public buildings to inspire the American people and encourage civic virtue.

President George Washington and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson consciously modeled the most important buildings in Washington, DC, on the classical architecture of ancient Athens and Rome.

They sought to use classical architecture to visually connect our contemporary Republic with the antecedents of democracy in classical antiquity, reminding citizens not only of their rights but also their responsibilities in maintaining and perpetuating its institutions.

AND WHOA, STOP RIGHT THERE, says the AUTOCRAT Joe Biden!

First of all, lose this “civic virtue” bull****, because we are a DEMOCRACY now, and there is no room in the democracy of the Democrats for such a thing as civic virtue, because it would thoroughly **** the works when it comes to Democrat fundraising, and raking off graft.

So for that reason alone, Trump’s Executive Order 13967 of December 18, 2020 had to go.

And Joe Biden does not want federal buildings inspiring the American people; he wants them striking fear into the American people.

Hence his choice of the Brutalist style of Architecture that Trump was rejecting.

And then, Trump’s executive order was based on RACISM, WHITE SUPREMACY and WHITE NATIONALISM with its reference to the totally disgraced names of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson who Joe Biden has called anathema down on because they owned slaves, and thus are part of a history that Joe Biden rejected by executive order on his first day in office on 20 January 2021.

Thus, any architecture designs dating back to them are now verboten in the America of Joe Biden and the Democrats because they are RACIST and intended to show WHITE POWER to keep the Black man down, whereas the Black folks and South Americans who form the core of Joe’s support are comfortable with Stalinist architecture, which then takes us to this:

They sought to use classical architecture to visually connect our contemporary Republic with the antecedents of democracy in classical antiquity, reminding citizens not only of their rights but also their responsibilities in maintaining and perpetuating its institutions.

end quotes

We’re having none of that **** under a Biden administration, says Joe Biden, as he signed all of that into non-existence.

There will be no talk of a REPUBLIC while Joe Biden is in power – WE’RE A DEMOCRACY NOW!

Got that, people?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-330079

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 25, 2021 at 10:46 pm

Paul Plante says:

And we are on the subject of making it up as they go, and dangerously so, we need to go back for a moment to the article in The Independent entitled “Garland says laws must be ‘fairly and faithfully enforced’” via AP news wire on 21 February 2021, where we have this excellent example of what is called in politics, “THE BIG LIE,” as follows, to wit:

And as federal prosecutors continue to bring cases following the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, Garland calls the insurrection a “heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government.”

end quotes

For those who are unfamiliar with the term, if not the technique, the “big lie” is a propaganda technique used for political purpose, defined as “a gross distortion or misrepresentation of the facts, especially when used as a propaganda device by a politician or official body”.

The German expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, to describe the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.

And Vladimir Lenin, a hero of all the Marxists in this country who seized control of our national government on 6 January 2021 in one very slick and very well organized COUP that toppled our Constitutional Republic and replaced it with a Marxist democracy, used this political aphorism to great advantage when he was in power in Russia, to wit: “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

And now we have Joe Biden’s attorney general pick, federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland, using that same Leninist aphorism that a lie told often enough becomes the truth in this following sentence from that article, to wit:

And as federal prosecutors continue to bring cases following the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, Garland calls the insurrection a “heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government.”

end quotes

Which first of all raises the question of what insurrection?

What insurrection can Merrick Garland, a federal judge who isn’t supposed to be playing at politics, although that does not seem to really faze him much as he plays at politics here, possibly be talking about, given there is no evidence that any insurrections ever took place?

Now, with respect to Trump, who was charged by Nancy Pelosi with inciting an insurrection, if there was indeed any credible evidence that an insurrection had in fact taken place, and Nancy Pelosi is as far from credible evidence as one can get and still be on the planet, as we can see from a review of our own history, after failing to get Trump convicted by the senate, Nancy Pelosi could simply have taken the evidence before a grand jury after Trump got out of office and had him indicted for insurrection, but she never did, so far as we know, and if she had in fact done so, it is impossible we would not have heard her crowing about it, which takes us to that history from an August 18, 2000 Memorandum Opinion for the Attorney General entitled “Whether a Former President May Be Indicted and Tried for the Same Offenses for Which He was Impeached by the House and Acquitted by the Senate,” as follows:

Two well-informed participants did, however, understand the Impeachment Judgment Clause to imply that an acquittal, like a conviction, would not bar criminal prosecution for the same offences.

James Wilson, a leading figure at the Constitutional Convention (and member of the Committee of Detail, which drafted the Impeachment Judgment Clause), and at the Pennsylvania ratifying convention, and later an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, revealed such an under­standing in remarks during the Pennsylvania ratifying convention.

Assuming, as many did during the ratification debates, that Senators as well as executive and judicial officers would be liable to impeachment, Wilson responded to the charge that the Senate could not serve as an effective impeachment court for its own members.

Noting that one third of the Senate faced re-election every two years, Wilson suggested that voters would throw out those who behaved improperly and that enough new Senators would regularly be added so that personal connections or collective involvement in the impeachable acts would not prevent fair trials.

Moreover, he argued, ‘‘Though they may not be convicted on impeachment before the Senate, they may be tried by their country; and if their criminality is estab­lished, the law will punish.”

Edmund Pendleton, the President of the Virginia Supreme Court and of the Virginia Ratifying Convention, apparently interpreted the Impeachment Judgment Clause in this way as well.

Shortly after the completion of the Constitutional Convention, Madison sent Pendleton a copy of the Con­stitution for his consideration.

In his generally favorable response, Pendleton con­fessed his leeriness of impeachments because of their susceptibility to partisan misuse, but noted that the impeachment power “is in the hands of the House of Representatives, who will not use it in the case Supposed, or if they do, and meet the obstruction, may yet resort to the courts of Justice, as an Acquital would not bar that remedy.’’

end quotes

So why hasn’t Nancy Pelosi done that, given that she must be possessed of voluminous evidence that there was actually an insurrection that Trump had incited?

And that answer, based on facts, is that there is as of yet no such evidence of an insurrection, which would seem to make Merrick Garland out as nothing more than a common garden-variety liar with his specious claim that “the insurrection was a heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government,” and what a load of horse**** that is, because what took place on 6 January 2021 was a SHAM, an empty ritual that if it didn’t happen would have changed nothing at all.

And who has been arrested so far, and for what?

For that answer, let’s go to a BBC article entitled “Capitol riots: Who has the FBI arrested so far?” published 27 January 2021, where we have as follows:

The suspects in the Capitol riot are a varied group: they include a West Virginia lawmaker, a Florida firefighter and a left-wing activist from Utah.

It’s been over two weeks since the Capitol Hill riot – how much progress has law enforcement made bringing the perpetrators to justice?

How many arrests so far?

Michael Sherwin, US Attorney for the District of Columbia, says they have identified 400 suspects and arrested 135 to date in connection with the Capitol siege.

He said the list of suspects is “growing by the hour,” but conceded they might not have probable cause to charge all 400.

end quotes

And what have they been arrested for?

Well, there is Riley June Williams, 22, a real live whack-job from Harrisburg, who is said to have stolen a laptop from Nancy Pelosi that she allegedly claimed she hoped to sell to Russian intelligence, and she is facing multiple charges, including aiding and abetting the theft of government property.

No insurrection though.

And there is a man named Kevin Seefried allegedly seen in viral photos carrying a Confederate flag in the Capitol during the riots who was charged on 14 January along with his son, Hunter, in a Wilmington, Delaware court on charges including entering a restricted building, violent entry and disorderly conduct.

But no insurrection.

And the list goes on and on, but no insurrection!

And were these all right-wing maniacal Trump supporters as we are being told over and over and over and over by the media, as they too engage in “THE BIG LIE,” who were engaged in an insurrection which Biden AG pick Merrick Garland says was a heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government?

How about John Sullivan?

According to the BBC, we have as follows concerning that individual, to wit:

A left-wing activist was also arrested after tweeting video of himself inside the US Capitol as protesters breached security.

John Sullivan, 26, was charged with entering a restricted building and violent entry or disorderly conduct.

He claimed in media interviews that he was just “documenting” the rampage, though the affidavit notes he has no press credentials.

The court document says Mr Sullivan can be heard saying in a video he filmed of the Capitol riot: “Let’s burn this shit down.”

He has identified himself in media interviews as a Black Lives Matter supporter, but rejects any association with antifa, a loosely affiliated group of far-left protesters.

Following the death of George Floyd last year, Mr Sullivan founded an activist group called Insurgence USA that advocates for racial justice.

He was charged in July 2020 with felony riot and criminal mischief over civil unrest in Provo, Utah.

end quotes

So if we have a left-wing wingnut who has been previously arrested for felony riot involved in the violence in Washington, D.C. on 6 January 2021, then who is really responsible for all the violence in the Capitol on 6 January 2021, people?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-329788

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Sat Feb 27, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 26, 2021 at 6:07 pm

Paul Plante says:

Just as Biden will NEVER apologize, and if you notice, I was very careful to say “IF HE REALLY WANTS TO HEAL THE NATION,” which Joe Biden has no intention of doing other than with the bayonet, he has to apologize; Joe Biden is not going to relinquish the dictatorial power he now has over our lives, which dictatorial power was awarded to him by Nancy Pelosi with the backing of a high-ranking military Junta in Washington, which has Joe Biden safely ensconced in a RING OF STEEL

Joe Biden has a Stalin complex, or a Hitler complex, two sides of one coin, or an Idi Amin complex, or a Saddam Hussein complex, or a Cromwellian complex that will not allow him to be less than a complete autocrat.

Joe is a hack politician who never really ever worked a day in his life, a college football brawler who suddenly came down with the worst case of asthma that you could ever imagine, which prevented Joe from fulfilling his dream to be a Marine platoon leader leading his screaming troops up some mountain in VEET NAM to root out an entrenched enemy battalion or two, so that Joe had to fall back on a career as a hack politician where he was a two-time loser in the race for the white house, and after holding the empty coat of Barack Obama for eight years, Joe now has the power, and like any bully, Joe is now going to use it, like Sulla the Roman tyrant, or Joe Stalin, to rid himself of his political enemies, which are us.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-330079

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Sat Feb 27, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 26, 2021 at 7:29 pm

Paul Plante says:

Way back in 1966, perhaps before Stuart Bell was even born, not that it makes a difference one way or the other, there was a song that came out and caught people’s attention with its words, “There’s something happening here; what it is ain’t exactly clear; there’s a man with a gun over there, telling me I’ve got to beware.”

What caught people’s attention in 1966 was the implication to all of us of those words, because for a whole generation or more, words like that HAD NOT been heard here before.

A police state?

Is that what we are becoming, people started asking themselves?

And of course we are, was the easy and correct answer, and now, we are!

And what Stuart Bell has not yet grasped is that on 6 January 2021, he and all the other Americans who are now considered the “oppressor” class, lost their government to the Marxists in a very slick and very well orchestrated COUP, and they are not going to get it back, because America is now the Republic that is no more, and Joe Biden is very much a Stalinist dictator bent on totally eradicating any memory of his predecessor in office as we clearly see in the Business Insider article “Biden revoked a slew of Trump executive orders, including one restricting funds to ‘anarchist’ cities and one insisting on neoclassical architecture” by Mia Jankowicz on February 25, 2021, where we had as follows:

President Joe Biden on Wednesday undid a series of Trump-era executive orders and memoranda.

He’s cutting “anarchist” city designations and will stop championing neoclassical federal buildings.

It’s Biden’s latest move to undo his predecessor’s legacy, much of which he can do unilaterally.

end quotes

Now, think on those words in that last sentence for a moment, people, those of you are rational, lucid, capable of thinking for yourself as opposed to drinking Biden KOOL-AID, and able to employ critical thinking skills to your benefit as a citizen, and ask yourself this critical question, to wit:

IF THE AUTOCRAT JOE BIDEN IS UNDOING THE LEGACY OF DONALD TRUMP, ESPECIALLY WITH REGARD TO THE ANARCHIST CITIES THAT ARE NOW BEING REWARDED BY JOE BIDEN FOR HELPING HIM AND NANCY PELOSI CREATE THE NEEDED VIOLENT DIVERSION ON 6 JANUARY 2021 THAT PROPELLED JOE BIDEN INTO POWER, EXACTLY WHAT LEGACY IS HE REPLACING IT WITH, WHEN HE IS VERY OBVIOUSLY BEING QUITE PARTIAL TO THE ANARCHISTS WHO ARE INTENT ON BRINGING DOWN OUR GOVERNMENT AND REPLACING IT WITH ANARCHY, CHAOS AND VIOLENCE?

And that takes us to Wikipedia and a word I learned as a young American, that word being Proscription, which is, in current usage, a ‘decree of condemnation to death or banishment’ and can be used in a political context to refer to state-approved murder or banishment.

The term originated in Ancient Rome, where it included public identification and official condemnation of declared enemies of the state and it often involved confiscation of property.

Its usage has been significantly widened to describe governmental and political sanctions of varying severity on individuals and classes of people who have fallen into disfavor, from the en masse suppression of adherents of unorthodox ideologies to the suppression of political rivals or personal enemies.

end quotes

That is what Joe Biden is doing to Trump and the supporters of Trump.

Is there anyone out there who doubts that?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-330079

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 26, 2021 at 10:22 pm

Paul Plante says:

And while we are on the subject of Biden pick for attorney general of the United States of America, that being federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland, an Obama-ite with a nice smile who seems to be none too bright, which I believe is why Mitch McConnell never gave him a hearing, because frankly, the dude is a flake unfit to be a Supreme Court justice, playing partisan politics here while feeding us a platter of pure BULL**** which he is passing off as steak tartare, let us go back this following sentence from the article in The Independent entitled “Garland says laws must be ‘fairly and faithfully enforced’” via AP news wire on 21 February 2021, where we have as follows, to wit:

And as federal prosecutors continue to bring cases following the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, Garland calls the insurrection a “heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government.”

end quotes

A heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy?”

The peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government?

HUH?

Does anyone have a clue as to what he could possibly be on about with either of those two inane (silly; stupid) statements, and especially that first one about a heinous attack that sought to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy?

That makes absolutely no sense at all, does it?

In fact, it is a stupid statement, where the word “sought” has as its synonyms the following: requested, tried, asked, attempted, solicited, endeavoured, wanted, desired, searched, looked, claimed, pursued, required, called, striven, requests.

So, a heinous attack that asked to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy?

A heinous attack that claimed to distrust a cornerstone of our democracy?

Stupid any way you try to put it, and this is a man Barack Obama wanted to put on the United States Supreme Court, if you can feature that, and now Joe Biden wants to make him attorney general so he can be the people’s lawyer, not Joe’s.

And what exactly is this “cornerstone of our democracy” that this so-called heinous attack sought to distrust, where “distrust” can be taken to mean the feeling that someone or something cannot be relied upon, as in “our distrust of the national government under the control of the Democrats,” or doubt the honesty or reliability of; regard with suspicion, as in “we the American people regard with suspicion the manner in which Joe Biden was made president of the United States of America?”

Does Merrick Garland, a federal judge who is supposed to uphold OUR Constitution and OUR laws, expect us to believe that this UNCONSTITUTIONAL FARCE that was played out in the capitol on 6 January 2021, where Nancy Pelosi made sure that neither the provisions of OUR Constitution regarding the electoral college nor the federal law on counting ballots were followed or adhered to, was a legitimate exercise of governmental authority?

And what of this horse**** about the “peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government?”

Didn’t that happen on 20 January 2021 just as the Constitution requires?

Didn’t Trump peacefully leave the white house shortly after 8:00 A.M. on 20 January 2021, even though the Constitution gave him until noon?

What about an ABC news story entitled “Trump leaves White House hours before Biden’s inauguration: ‘Have a good life'” by Emily Shapiro on January 20, 2021, where we were informed as follows:

President Donald Trump, holding hands with Melania Trump, left the White House for the final time as commander in chief shortly after 8 a.m. Wednesday.

Trump boarded Marine One to head to Joint Base Andrews for a farewell speech hours before Joe Biden is sworn in as 46th president of the United States.

end quotes

Is that fake news?

Is that not true?

Is Trump still in Washington holding the white house with superior military force?

No, wait, that is Joe Biden?

So what on earth is Merrick Garland on about with this horse**** about a “peaceful transfer of power to a newly elected government?”

If Trump left peacefully hours before our Constitution said Joe Biden was ACTUALLY president, which is noon on the 20th, not just some schmoe who thought he was president, then how is it that Merrick Garland doesn’t believe there was a peaceful transfer of power from Trump to the newly elected government of Joe Biden?

Is he stupid?

Or just woefully uninformed?

Either way, of course, he is a great pick to be attorney general under Joe Biden.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-330193

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 27, 2021 at 11:39 pm

Paul Plante says:

What Stuart Bell and others in this country have not yet realized and come to grips with is the fact that on 6 January 2021, they lost the “battle of democracy” to the Marxists, in what appears to be a repeat in this country of the events in Germany on March 23, 1933 when Adolph Hitler appeared in the German Reichstag as the newly-appointed Chancellor to announce his Enabling Act of 1933, to wit:

Ladies and Gentlemen of the German Reichstag!

By agreement with the Reich Government, today the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and the German National People’s Party have presented to you for resolution a notice of motion concerning a “Law for Removing the Distress of Volk and Reich.”

The reasons for this extraordinary measure are as follows: In November 1918, the Marxist organizations seized the executive power by means of a Revolution.

end quotes

When Hitler made reference to the “Marxist organization that seized the executive power by means of a Revolution,” which just happened again in this country on 6 January 2021, he was making reference to the Social Democratic Party of Germany.

Established in 1863, the SPD is by far the oldest existing political party represented in the Bundestag and was one of the first Marxist-influenced parties in the world.

From the 1890s through the early 20th century, the SPD was Europe’s largest Marxist party and was consistently the most popular party in Germany.

The SPD played a leading role in the German Revolution of 1918–1919 and was chiefly responsible for the foundation of the Weimar Republic.

SPD politician Friedrich Ebert served as the first President of Germany and the SPD was the strongest party until 1932.

After the rise of the Nazi Party to power, it was banned in 1933 and operated in exile as the Sopade.

end quotes

And now, in this country, they have exacted their long-sought after revenge, and in what is a stunning reversal of the tactics the Nazis used against the Communists with the Reichstag fire, believed set by the Nazis, but blamed on the Communists, the Marxists staged an “insurrection” at the Capitol on 6 January 2021 and blamed it on Trump and his supporters.

Very slick and very well orchestrated and now the Marxists own our national government!

And seriously, people, is there anyone out there over the age of 12 who is surprised at this?

Are there really people in America today who don’t know this history?

This is history that I learned as a five-year old AMERICAN citizen on the first day of Kindergarten after the close of WWII, and the reason this was being taught to us as children back then was to prepare us for what just occurred in Washington, D.C. on 6 January 2021 when we lost our Republic and became a Marxist democracy.

As it was explained to us back then, the struggle between those committed to communism and and those opposed to communism which played out in Europe before and during WWII was next going to appear here, for many reasons, starting out with the fact that of all the nations on the earth to overthrow, the United States was the prize of prizes.

Why?

Well, according to the communist game plan, for international communism to finally succeed, it was necessary for the United States to become a communist nation, and the overthrow, or take-over of the government of the United States has been discussed by the communists since the 1800’s, which is how long this power struggle has been going on.

Those words above from The Communist Manifesto about the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy were written by Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels on June 24, 1872, just a few years after the insurrection and civil war of the Democrats in this country was crushed by the forces of the Republic that was just defeated by the Democrats (Marxists) on 6 January 2021.

And once again, can anyone possibly be surprised by any of this, which has never been any kind of secret?

Consider the THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR article on October 22, 2017 entitled “On Neo-Fascism in America today in the Guise of Progressivism” http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/p ... ressivism/ or THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR article on October 14, 2018 titled “Op-Ed: Fighting for the Soul of America” http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... f-america/ or THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR article on July 24, 2016 entitled “On Alleged Progressivism In America in 2016” http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/p ... n-america/ wherein was clearly stated thusly:

In the name of “progressivism,” which it most assuredly is not, if brought into power in this up-coming presidential election, the Democratic Party in the United States of America intends to impose on these United States of America a tyranny not seen in this land since the time of the tyranny of King George III back in 1776, a tyranny similar to that now on-going in Turkey under Erdogan where Turkish society is being “purged” of Gulenist elements.

In support of that assertion, all I need do is to refer us to page 14 of a document, a manifesto, really, with manifesto being a public declaration of policy and aims, especially one issued before an election by a political party or candidate, titled the 2016 Democratic Party Platform, July 21, 2016, As Approved by the Democratic Platform Committee July 8-9, 2016 – Orlando, FL, where we find these following words of importance to us all in this nation: Ending Systemic Racism.

Systemic refers to something that is spread throughout, system-wide, affecting a group or system, such as a society as a whole.

In other words, in the words of the Democrat Manifesto for 2016, American society is sick from one end to the other, so that it is now time for the Democrat Party to take the law into its own hands to purge the United States of America of this “systemic racism” the way Turkey is being purged of Gulenism.

In that section of its manifesto, we are informed as follows:

Democrats will fight to end institutional and systemic racism in our society.

We will challenge and dismantle the structures that define lasting racial, economic, political, and social inequity.

end quote

Dismantle the structures.

Focus your thoughts on that for a moment if you will, people, especially the word “dismantle.”

The Democrats, who according to Gallup polling in 2010 constituted just 31% of Americans, have determined that they have the right to dismantle OUR nation and re-structure it the way they want it to be for them.

More to the point, that 31% of Americans have made a broad-brush accusation with that unsupported claim of theirs that there is systemic racism all throughout this land.

Where is their evidence?

The answer is they don’t have any and they don’t need any.

It is how they “feel,” and for them, that is all that is needed, and that is good enough.

Based on their “feelings,” our nation has to be “dismantled” and then re-structured in their image, because they alone know what is good for the rest of us in this nation.

end quotes

2021 – THEY WON!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-330648

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 28, 2021 at 9:57 pm

Paul Plante says:

And while we are on the subject of making it up as they go, and making wild and reckless claims and charges without presenting any evidence or proof to back them up, which is what the main-stream media was always accusing Trump of doing, with no evidence to support their charge that Trump was making things up, which is what the main-stream media has been doing for as long as I can remember, how about the Hearst publication story “FBI arrests Capital Region man for Capitol siege involvement” by Edward McKinley of the Albany, New York Times Union updated Jan. 19, 2021, where we had as follows, to wit:

ALBANY — A Capital Region man was arrested Saturday night for his participation in the storming of the U.S. Capitol, the FBI Albany office announced.

Brandon Fellows, a 2012 Niskayuna High School graduate who has a Schenectady address on his driver’s license, was charged with violent entry of restricted grounds for his role in the siege at the U.S. Capitol during the certification of the Electoral College results Jan. 6.

Fellows has bragged about his role in the violence on his social media accounts, according to court filings, as well as to members of the media.

end quotes

As an aside, a picture of this Brandon Fellows, a typical example of the type of very ignorant morons being produced by what we are told is an “educational system” in this country, is being used by Hearst in the same way the Nazis in Germany very effectively used pictures of Marinus van der Lubbe, an unemployed 24-year-old Dutch laborer with Communist sympathies, to turn the passions of the public against the Communists in Germany after the Reichstag fire which gave Adolph Hitler absolute power in Germany as a dictator, with this WHACK-JOB who graduated as a certified imbecilic moron from Niskayuna High School in 2012 being touted by Hearst as the quintessential (representing the most perfect or typical example of a class) Trump supporter, to put forth an insulting impression that the only people in the United States of America who supported Trump were complete idiots like this moron Brandon Fellows who graduated from Niskayuna High School in 2012, which takes us to their website for a moment, as follows:

Mission Statement

The faculty, staff, students, parents and community of Niskayuna High School believe that our mission is to educate students to become lifelong learners who believe in their own potential.

We will provide opportunities for all students to acquire knowledge, develop skills, and form attitudes that will enable them to take a responsible and active role in their local and global communities.

end quotes

And in the case of this moronic idiot Brandon Fellows, what a large load of hot, steaming pig**** that all is, because they failed big time with this moron Fellows, which takes us back to the Times Union article for more horse****, as follows:

Fellows, who Bloomberg reported lives in a converted school bus in the Capital Region, has not been shy about his participation in the insurrection that has led to five deaths.

end quotes

The insurrection?

What insurrection?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A CLAIM OF INSURRECTION?

This mindless idiot Fellows was charged with violent entry of restricted grounds, which is a long way away from an insurrection, but hey, we are talking about Hearst and YELLOW JOURNALISM, which is their forte, so what the hell need do they have for facts?

And looking at those four sentences we have so far from Hearst alone, we have:

1) The storming of the U.S. Capitol, as if it were July 14, 1789 all over again with Parisian revolutionaries and mutinous troops storming and dismantling the Bastille, a royal fortress and prison that had come to symbolize the tyranny of the Bourbon monarchs, which dramatic action signaled the beginning of the French Revolution, a decade of political turmoil and terror in which King Louis XVI was overthrown and tens of thousands of people, including the king and his wife Marie Antoinette, were executed;

2) A siege at the U.S. Capitol during the certification of the Electoral College results Jan. 6, as if it were February 23, 1836 all over again with a Mexican force numbering in the thousands and led by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna beginning a 13-day siege of the Alamo;

3) Fellows bragging about his role in the violence; and

4) An insurrection!

So how is that for a fine example of the type of YELLOW JOURNALISM (journalism that is based upon sensationalism and crude exaggeration, as in “equating insurrection with smoking pot is the worst yellow journalism”) Hearst publications have been world famous for since the Spanish-American War?

But there is more, as follows:

He told Bloomberg that his profile on the dating app Bumble, however, has been “blowing up” ever since his participation in the insurrection against the U.S. government.

end quotes

HUH?

His participation in the “insurrection” against the U.S. government?

Where the U.S. government is defined by rational, logical, lucid and non-idiotic or non-moronic or non-imbecilic people as the executive and legislative and judicial branches of the federal government of the United States, what a real stupid statement that is, given that on 6 January 2021 Donald Trump just happened to be the executive branch of the U.S. government that this so-called insurrection was aimed at.

And what exactly was the role this Fellows moron played in that insurrection against the administration of Donald Trump on 6 January 2021?

For that answer, let’s go to a WNYT NewsChannel 13 story on the same subject titled “U.S. Capitol protestor from Niskayuna: ‘I have one regret'” by Dan Levy on February 14, 2021, where we had more of that “insurrection” horse**** as follows:

SCHENECTADY – When NewsChannel 13 sat down for a chat with Brandon Fellows on Saturday afternoon, he wore the same fake beard and sunglasses he had on at the U.S. Capitol the day of the insurrection.

He insists he didn’t know he wasn’t supposed to be inside the Capitol, and he says Capitol Police officers invited him and others into the building on that infamous afternoon.

He also says he has video evidence to prove it.

“A lot of us did wait until we had permission from police to go in,” he said.

“The general sentiment among most people was don’t be violent, don’t destroy things, and don’t steal things.”

end quotes

Ah, I don’t know about anyone else, but so far, I am having some trouble here connecting any of this with any supposed insurrection on 6 January 2021 against the administration of Donald Trump, but let’s dig a little deeper where we have:

Fellows says, at one point, he wandered into Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley’s office and put his feet up on a table, as he and others passed around what appeared to be a marijuana joint.

“I do regret potentially smoking what may have been weed,” he said.

“I think that discredits me and makes me look stupid to a lot of people.”

end quotes

WOW!

The moron is not a complete idiot, afterall

Yes, Brandon, it does discredit you and yes, it does make you look real stupid to people all across the world, BUT, does it make you an insurrectionist?

Let’s go back to the story and see:

Fellows is facing two misdemeanors — entering the Capitol unlawfully and disorderly conduct.

end quotes

HMMMMMM!

Where’s the charges of being in an insurrection?

Oh, there aren’t any, because there wasn’t one, which will not stop the main-stream media that makes it up as they go from continuing to claim there was an insurrection, even though they have no evidence to back up their claims.

And so it goes!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-331084

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 31870
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:40 p

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR February 28, 2021 at 6:54 pm

Paul Plante says:

As can clearly be seen in this following communication on 17 January 2021 from myself as a heteronormative, white male with a stable, productive and law-abiding nuclear family to U.S. Congressman Antonio Delgado, 1007 Longworth HOB, Washington, DC 20515, as a heteronormative white male who is a disabled combat veteran, with respect to values that are central to our democracy: justice, fairness, and equal protection under the law, I am entitled to none of that as someone who stood up for this country in combat, and as can be seen from the communication to Congressman Delgado, as a disabled veteran, I have lived without basic civil rights protections for far too long, and until that is recognized and rectified, we will never be one step closer to ensuring that no one is denied access to their constitutional rights because of their sexual orientation as a heteronormative male or their gender identity as a white heteronormative male, to wit:

Dear Congressman:

As this new year begins, I hope it finds you well, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your confirmation in a May 22, 2020 e-mail to me from your regional representative Madison Wellman on the record and for the record the fact that with respect to my civil and human rights being stripped from me by the Town of Poestenkill in your Congressional District in retaliation for my having given evidence of endemic corruption in Poestenkill to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, there will be no aid or comfort coming my way from the federal government, which is something I was first informed of in early 1992 by an FBI agent named Tom Dauenhauer with whom I had been involved with in the Hobbs Act investigation of endemic public corruption in Poestenkill and Rensselaer County.

In that conversation with FBI agent Dauenhauer, which occurred on Broadway in Albany in front of the Post Office building where the FBI was at that time located, the FBI agent took pains to explain to me just how stupid I had been in trying to blow the whistle on public corruption in New York state, and since he was in a mood to teach, I figured I might as well stay for the whole lesson, which included a primer on how I was sold down the river by an assistant U.S. attorney named Barbara Cottrell, in exchange for her name being placed on a list of appointees to a federal judgeship, and how evidence I had provided of corruption in Rensselaer County and Poestenkill had been destroyed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

He then told me that he had been ordered to have no contact with me, and his advice to me at that point was quite explicit: I had very powerful political enemies in New York, and that as a result, I would be wisest if I would run somewhere far from here and go into hiding, because while I was still here, they would remain relentless in their efforts to do me harm in as public a manner as possible to make me an example to discourage anyone else who would think of doing as I dared to do, which was to blow the whistle on corruption in Rensselaer County and Poestenkill.

And my life has been made into a living hell ever since, because I am not a runner.

Thank you for confirming that that is not going to change for me in this lifetime if the federal government has any say in the matter.

As to your suggestion that I try working with the Town of Poestenkill for a solution, when it is the Town of Poestenkill that is engaged in retaliation against me to make my life a living hell, I would respond that that is quite impossible.

Respectfully,

end quotes

So how come these LGBQT+’s are entitled to something I am not entitled to as someone who is not gay or queer or a lesbian or a bi or a trans?

Why am I a second-class citizen as compared to them?

What is it that makes them superior to me, other than their ability to raise huge amounts of cash to purchase the favors of someone like Elaine Luria?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/c ... ent-331383

Post Reply