KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

Once, [Stalin] was told during a discussion that our situation on the land was a difficult one and that the situation in cattle breeding and meat production was especially bad.

[From this] there came a commission charged with the preparation of a resolution called “Measures toward the further development of animal husbandry in kolkhozes and sovkhozes.”

We worked out this project.

Of course, our proposals at that time did not cover all the possibilities.

However we did chart ways in which animal husbandry on kolkhozes and sovkhozes could be boosted.

We proposed to raise livestock prices so as to create material incentives for kolkhoz, MTS [machine-tractor station] and sovkhoz workers in developing breeding.

But our project was not accepted.

In February 1953 it was laid aside entirely.

What is more, while reviewing this project Stalin proposed that the taxes paid by kolkhozes and by kolkhoz workers should be raised by 40 billion rubles.

According to him, the peasants were well off and a kolkhoz worker would need to sell only one more chicken to pay his tax in full.

Think about what this implied.

Forty billion rubles is a sum which [these workers] did not realize for all the products which they sold to the State.

In 1952, for instance, kolkhozes and kolkhoz workers received 26,280 million rubles for all products delivered and sold to the State.

Did Stalin’s position, then, rest on data of any sort whatever?

Of course not.

In such cases facts and figures did not interest him.

If Stalin said anything, it meant it was so – after all, he was a “genius,” and a genius does not need to count, he only needs to look and can immediately tell how it should be.

When he expresses his opinion, everyone has to repeat it and to admire his wisdom.


But how much wisdom was contained in the proposal to raise the agricultural tax by 40 billion rubles?

None, absolutely none, because the proposal was not based on an actual assessment of the situation but on the fantastic ideas of a person divorced from reality.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

Once, [Stalin] was told during a discussion that our situation on the land was a difficult one and that the situation in cattle breeding and meat production was especially bad.

[From this] there came a commission charged with the preparation of a resolution called “Measures toward the further development of animal husbandry in kolkhozes and sovkhozes.”

We worked out this project.

Of course, our proposals at that time did not cover all the possibilities.

However we did chart ways in which animal husbandry on kolkhozes and sovkhozes could be boosted.

We proposed to raise livestock prices so as to create material incentives for kolkhoz, MTS [machine-tractor station] and sovkhoz workers in developing breeding.

But our project was not accepted.

In February 1953 it was laid aside entirely.

What is more, while reviewing this project Stalin proposed that the taxes paid by kolkhozes and by kolkhoz workers should be raised by 40 billion rubles.

According to him, the peasants were well off and a kolkhoz worker would need to sell only one more chicken to pay his tax in full.

Think about what this implied.

Forty billion rubles is a sum which [these workers] did not realize for all the products which they sold to the State.

In 1952, for instance, kolkhozes and kolkhoz workers received 26,280 million rubles for all products delivered and sold to the State.

Did Stalin’s position, then, rest on data of any sort whatever?

Of course not.

In such cases facts and figures did not interest him.

If Stalin said anything, it meant it was so – after all, he was a “genius,” and a genius does not need to count, he only needs to look and can immediately tell how it should be.

When he expresses his opinion, everyone has to repeat it and to admire his wisdom.


But how much wisdom was contained in the proposal to raise the agricultural tax by 40 billion rubles?

None, absolutely none, because the proposal was not based on an actual assessment of the situation but on the fantastic ideas of a person divorced from reality.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Thu Jun 03, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

We are currently beginning slowly to work our way out of a difficult agricultural situation.

The speeches of the delegates to the Twentieth Congress please us all.

We are glad that many delegates have delivered speeches [to the effect] that conditions exist for fulfilling the sixth Five-Year Plan for animal husbandry [early]: not in five years, but within two to three years.

We are certain that the commitments of the new Five-Year Plan will be accomplished successfully.

(Prolonged applause.)

Comrades!

If we sharply criticize today the cult of the individual which was so widespread during Stalin’s life, and if we speak about the many negative phenomena generated by this cult (which is so alien to the spirit of Marxism-Leninism), some may ask: How could it be?

Stalin headed the Party and the country for 30 years and many victories were gained during his lifetime.

Can we deny this?

In my opinion, the question can be asked in this manner only by those who are blinded and hopelessly hypnotized by the cult of the individual, only by those who do not understand the essence of the revolution and of the Soviet state, only by those who do not understand, in a Leninist manner, the role of the Party and of the nation in the development of the Soviet society.

[Our] Socialist Revolution was attained by the working class and by the poor peasantry with the partial support of middle-class peasants.

It was attained by the people under the leadership of the Bolshevik Party.

Lenin’s great service consisted of the fact that he created a militant Party of the working class, but he was armed with Marxist understanding of the laws of social development and with the science of proletarian victory in the fight with capitalism, and he steeled this Party in the crucible of the revolutionary struggle of the masses of the people.

During this fight the Party consistently defended the interests of the people and became its experienced leader.

[The Party] led the working masses to power, to the creation of the first socialist state.

You remember well the wise words of Lenin: that the Soviet state is strong because of the awareness of the masses that history is created by the millions and tens of millions of people.


Our historical victories were attained thanks to the Party’s organizational work, to the many provincial organizations, and to the self-sacrificing work of our great nation.

These victories are the result of the great drive and activity of the nation and of the Party as a whole.

They are not at all the fruit of Stalin’s leadership, which is how the situation was pictured during the period of the cult of the individual.


TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

If we are to consider this matter as Marxists and as Leninists, then we have to state unequivocally that the leadership practices which came into being during the last years of Stalin’s life became a serious obstacle in the path of Soviet social development.

Stalin often failed for months to take up some unusually important problems, concerning the life of the Party and of the State, whose solution could not be postponed.

During Stalin’s leadership our peaceful relations with other nations were often threatened, because one-man decisions could cause, and often did cause, great complications.

In the past [few] years, [after] we managed to free ourselves of the harmful practice of the cult of the individual and took several proper steps in terms of [both] internal and external policies, everyone [has been able to see] how activity has grown before our very eyes, how the creative activity of the broad working masses has developed, and how favorably all this has acted upon economic and cultural development.

(Applause.)

Some comrades may ask us: Where were the members of the Politbiuro?

Why did they not assert themselves against the cult of the individual in time?

And why is this being done only now?


First of all, we have to consider the fact that the members of the Politbiuro viewed these matters in a different way at different times.

Initially, many of them backed Stalin actively because he was one of the strongest Marxists and his logic, his strength and his will greatly influenced [Party] cadres and Party work.

It is known that after Lenin’s death, especially during the first years, Stalin actively fought for Leninism against the enemies of Leninist theory and against those who deviated.

Beginning with Leninist theory, the Party, with its Central Committee at the head, started on a great scale work on the socialist industrialization of the country, on agricultural collectivization, and on cultural revolution.

At that time Stalin gained great popularity, sympathy and support.

The Party had to fight those who tried to lead the country away from the correct Leninist path.

It had to fight Trotskyites, Zinovievites and rightists, and bourgeois nationalists.

This fight was indispensable.


Later, however, Stalin, abusing his power more and more, began to fight eminent Party and Government leaders and to use terroristic methods against honest Soviet people.

As we have already shown, Stalin thus handled such eminent Party and State leaders as Kosior, Rudzutak, Eikhe, Postyshev and many others.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Sat Jun 05, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

Attempts to oppose groundless suspicions and charges resulted in the opponent’s falling victim to the repression.

This characterized the fall of comrade Postyshev.

In one of his [exchanges] Stalin expressed his dissatisfaction with Postyshev and asked him, “What are you actually?”

Postyshev answered clearly, “I am a Bolshevik, comrade Stalin, a Bolshevik.”

At first, this assertion was considered to show [merely] a lack of respect for Stalin.

Later it was considered a harmful act.

Eventually it resulted in Postyshev’s annihilation and castigation as an “enemy of the people.”

In the situation which then prevailed, I often talked with Nikolay Alexandrovich Bulganin.

Once when we two were traveling in a car, he said, “It has happened sometimes that a man goes to Stalin on his invitation as a friend."

"And when he sits with Stalin, he does not know where he will be sent next – home or to jail.”

It is clear that such conditions put every member of the Politbiuro in a very difficult situation.

And, when we also consider the fact that in the last years Central Committee Plenary sessions were not convened and that sessions of the Politbiuro occurred only occasionally, from time to time, then we will understand how difficult it was for any member of the Politbiuro to take a stand against one or another unjust or improper procedure, against serious errors and shortcomings in leadership practices.

As we have already shown, many decisions were taken either by one person or in a roundabout way, without collective discussion.

The sad fate of Politbiuro member comrade Voznesensky, who fell victim to Stalin’s repressions, is known to all.

Characteristically, the decision to remove him from the Politbiuro was never discussed but was reached in a devious fashion.

In the same way came the decision regarding Kuznetsov’s and Rodionov’s removals from their posts.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Sun Jun 06, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

The importance of the Central Committee’s Politbiuro was reduced and its work was disorganized by the creation within the Politbiuro of various commissions – the so-called “quintets,” “sextets,” “septets” and “nonets.”

Here is, for instance, a Politbiuro resolution from October 3, 1946:

“Stalin’s proposal:

“1. The Politbiuro Commission for Foreign Affairs (’Sextet’) is to concern itself in the future, in addition to foreign affairs, also with matters of internal construction and domestic policy.

“2. The Sextet is to add to its roster the Chairman of the State Commission of Economic Planning of the USSR, comrade Voznesensky, and is to be known as a Septet.

“Signed: Secretary of the Central Committee, J. Stalin.”

What [sophistry]!

(Laughter in the hall.)

It is clear that the creation within the Politbiuro of this type of commissions – “quintets,” “sextets,” “septets” and “nonets” – was against the principle of collective leadership.

The result of this was that some members of the Politbiuro were in this way kept away from participation in reaching the most important state matters.

One of the oldest members of our Party, Klimenty Yefremovich Voroshilov, found himself in an almost impossible situation.

For several years he was actually deprived of the right of participation in Politbiuro sessions.

Stalin forbade him to attend Politbiuro sessions and to receive documents.

When the Politbiuro was in session and comrade Voroshilov heard about it, he telephoned each time and asked whether he would be allowed to attend.

Sometimes Stalin permitted it, but always showed his dissatisfaction.

Because of his extreme suspicion, Stalin toyed also with the absurd and ridiculous suspicion that Voroshilov was an English agent.

(Laughter in the hall.)

It’s true – an English agent.

A special tap was installed in his home to listen to what was said there.

(Indignation in the hall.)

By unilateral decision, Stalin had also separated one other man from the work of the Politbiuro – Andrey Andreyevich Andreyev.

This was one of the most unbridled acts of willfulness.

Let us consider the first Central Committee Plenum after the 19th Party Congress.

Stalin, in his talk at the Plenum, characterized Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov and Anastas Ivanovich Mikoyan and suggested that these old workers of our Party were guilty of some baseless charges.

We cannot rule out the possibility that had Stalin remained at the helm for another several months, Comrades Molotov and Mikoyan probably would not have delivered any speeches at this [20th] Congress.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Mon Jun 07, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

Stalin evidently had plans to finish off the older members of the Politbiuro.

He often stated that Politbiuro members should be replaced by new ones.

His proposal after the 19th Congress to elect 25 persons to the Central Committee Presidium was aimed at the removal of old Politbiuro members and at bringing in less experienced persons so that these would extol him in all sorts of ways.


We can assume that this was also a design for the future annihilation of the old Politbiuro members and, in this way, a cover for all shameful acts of Stalin, acts which we are now considering.

Comrades!

So as not to repeat errors of the past, the Central Committee has declared itself resolutely against the cult of the individual.

We consider that Stalin was extolled to excess.


However, in the past Stalin undoubtedly performed great services to the Party, to the working class and to the international workers’ movement.

This question is complicated by the fact that all this which we have just discussed was done during Stalin’s life under his leadership and with his concurrence; here Stalin was convinced that this was necessary for the defense of the interests of the working classes against the plotting of enemies and against the attack of the imperialist camp.

He saw this from the position of the interest of the working class, of the interest of the laboring people, of the interest of the victory of socialism and communism.

We cannot say that these were the deeds of a giddy despot.

He considered that this should be done in the interest of the Party, of the working masses, in the name of the defense of the revolution’s gains.

In this lies the whole tragedy!

Comrades!

Lenin had often stressed that modesty is an absolutely integral part of a real Bolshevik.

Lenin himself was the living personification of the greatest modesty.

We cannot say that we have been following this Leninist example in all respects.


It is enough to point out that many towns, factories and industrial enterprises, kolkhozes and sovkhozes, Soviet institutions and cultural institutions have been referred to by us with a title if I may express it so – of private property of the names of these or those Government or Party leaders who were still active and in good health.

Many of us participated in the action of assigning our names to various towns, rayons, enterprises and kolkhozes.

We must correct this.

(Applause.)

But this should be done calmly and slowly.

The Central Committee will discuss this matter and consider it carefully in order to prevent errors and excesses.

I can remember how Ukraine learned about Kossior’s arrest.

Kiev radio used to start its programs thus: “This is Radio Kosior.”

When one day the programs began without mentioning Kosior, everyone was quite certain that something had happened to him and that he probably had been arrested.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Jun 08, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, continued ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

Thus, if today we begin to change the signs everywhere and to rename things, people will think that these comrades in whose honor the given enterprises, kolkhozes or cities are named also met some bad fate and that they have also been arrested.

(Animation in the hall.)

How is the authority and the importance of this or that leader judged?

On the basis of how many towns, industrial enterprises and factories, kolkhozes and sovkhozes carry his name.


Is it not about time that we eliminate this “private property” and “nationalize” the factories, the industrial enterprises, the kolkhozes and the sovkhozes?

(Laughter, applause, voices: “That is right.”)

This will benefit our cause.

After all, the cult of the individual is manifested also in this way.

We should, in all seriousness, consider the question of the cult of the individual.

We cannot let this matter get out of the Party, especially not to the press.

It is for this reason that we are considering it here at a closed Congress session.


We should know the limits; we should not give ammunition to the enemy; we should not wash our dirty linen before their eyes.

I think that the delegates to the Congress will understand and assess properly all these proposals.

(Tumultuous applause.)

Comrades!

We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all; we must draw the proper conclusions concerning both ideological-theoretical and practical work.


It is necessary for this purpose:

First, in a Bolshevik manner to condemn and to eradicate the cult of the individual as alien to Marxism-Leninism and not consonant with the principles of Party leadership and the norms of Party life, and to fight inexorably all attempts at bringing back this practice in one form or another.

To return to and actually practice in all our ideological work the most important theses of Marxist-Leninist science about the people as the creator of history and as the creator of all material and spiritual good of humanity, about the decisive role of the Marxist Party in the revolutionary fight for the transformation of society, about the victory of communism.


In this connection we will be forced to do much work in order to examine critically from the Marxist-Leninist viewpoint and to correct the widely spread erroneous views connected with the cult of the individual in the spheres of history, philosophy, economy and of other sciences, as well as in literature and the fine arts.

It is especially necessary that in the immediate future we compile a serious textbook of the history of our Party which will be edited in accordance with scientific Marxist objectivism, a textbook of the history of Soviet society, a book pertaining to the events of the Civil War and the Great Patriotic War.

Second, to continue systematically and consistently the work done by the Party’s Central Committee during the last years, a work characterized by minute observation in all Party organizations, from the bottom to the top, of the Leninist principles of Party leadership, characterized, above all, by the main principle of collective leadership, characterized by the observance of the norms of Party life described in the statutes of our Party, and, finally, characterized by the wide practice of criticism and self-criticism.

Third, to restore completely the Leninist principles of Soviet socialist democracy, expressed in the Constitution of the Soviet Union, to fight willfulness of individuals abusing their power.

The evil caused by acts violating revolutionary socialist legality which have accumulated during a long time as a result of the negative influence of the cult of the individual has to be completely corrected.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 36475
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: KRUSHCHEV SPEECH ON CULT OF PERSONALITY

Post by thelivyjr » Tue Jun 15, 2021 1:40 p

Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive

Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U.
, concluded ...

Speech Delivered: February 24-25 1956;

Comrades!

The 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has manifested with a new strength the unshakable unity of our Party, its cohesiveness around the Central Committee, its resolute will to accomplish the great task of building communism.

(Tumultuous applause.)

And the fact that we present in all their ramifications the basic problems of overcoming the cult of the individual which is alien to Marxism-Leninism, as well as the problem of liquidating its burdensome consequences, is evidence of the great moral and political strength of our Party.

(Prolonged applause.)

We are absolutely certain that our Party, armed with the historical resolutions of the 20th Congress, will lead the Soviet people along the Leninist path to new successes, to new victories.

(Tumultuous, prolonged applause.)

Long live the victorious banner of our Party – Leninism!

(Tumultuous, prolonged applause ending in ovation. All rise.)

Khrushchev Reference Archive

https://www.marxists.org/archive/khrush ... /02/24.htm

Post Reply