February 28 incident
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The February 28 incident, also rendered as the February 28 massacre, 228 incident, or 228 massacre, was an anti-government uprising in Taiwan that was violently suppressed by the Kuomintang-led Republic of China government, which killed thousands of civilians beginning on February 28, 1947.
The number of Taiwanese deaths from the incident and massacre was estimated to be between 18,000 and 28,000.
The massacre marked the beginning of the White Terror, in which tens of thousands of other Taiwanese went missing, died, or were imprisoned.
The incident is one of the most important events in Taiwan's modern history and was a critical impetus for the Taiwan independence movement.
In 1945, following the surrender of Japan at the end of World War II, the Allies handed administrative control of Taiwan to the Republic of China (ROC), thus ending 50 years of Japanese colonial rule.
Local inhabitants became resentful of what they saw as highhanded and frequently corrupt conduct on the part of the Kuomintang (KMT) authorities, including arbitrary seizure of private property, economic mismanagement, and exclusion from political participation.
The flashpoint came on February 27, 1947, in Taipei, when agents of the State Monopoly Bureau struck a Taiwanese widow suspected of selling contraband cigarettes.
An officer then fired into a crowd of angry bystanders, striking one man who died the next day.
Soldiers fired upon demonstrators the next day, after which a radio station was seized and news of the revolt was broadcast to the entire island.
As the uprising spread, the KMT-installed governor Chen Yi called for military reinforcements, and the uprising was violently put down by the National Revolutionary Army.
For the following 38 years, the island was placed under martial law in a period that would be known as the White Terror.
During the White Terror, the KMT persecuted perceived political dissidents, and the incident was considered too taboo to be discussed.
President Lee Teng-hui became the first president to discuss the incident publicly on its anniversary in 1995.
The event is now openly discussed and details of the event have become the subject of government and academic investigation.
February 28 is now an official public holiday called Peace Memorial Day, on which the president of Taiwan gathers with other officials to ring a commemorative bell in memory of the victims.
Monuments and memorial parks to the victims of 2/28 have been erected in a number of Taiwanese cities.
In particular, Taipei's former Taipei New Park was renamed 228 Peace Memorial Park, and the National 228 Memorial Museum was opened on February 28, 1997.
The Kaohsiung Museum of History also has a permanent exhibit detailing the events of the 228 Incident in Kaohsiung.
In 2019, the Transitional Justice Commission exonerated those who were convicted in the aftermath.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
THE FEBRUARY 28th INCIDENT
Re: THE FEBRUARY 28th INCIDENT
February 28 incident, continued ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Background
During the 50 years of Japanese rule in Taiwan (1895–1945), Taiwan experienced economic development and an increased standard of living, serving as a supply base for the Japanese main islands.
After World War II, Taiwan was placed under the administrative control of the Republic of China to provide stability until a permanent arrangement could be made.
Chen Yi, the Governor-General of Taiwan, arrived on October 24, 1945, and received the last Japanese governor, Ando Rikichi, who signed the document of surrender on the next day.
Chen Yi then proclaimed the day as Retrocession Day to make Taiwan part of the Republic of China.
Taiwanese perceptions of the Japanese rule were more positive than perceptions in other parts of East and Southeast Asia.
Despite this, the Kuomintang troops from Mainland China were initially welcomed by the Taiwanese.
Their harsh conduct and the KMT maladministration quickly led to Taiwanese discontent during the immediate postwar period.
As Governor-General, Chen Yi took over and sustained the Japanese system of state monopolies in tobacco, sugar, camphor, tea, paper, chemicals, petroleum refining, mining, and cement, the same way the Nationalists treated people in other former Japanese-controlled areas (earning Chen Yi the nickname "robber").
He confiscated some 500 Japanese-owned factories and mines, and homes of former Japanese residents.
Economic mismanagement led to a large black market, runaway inflation and food shortages.
Many commodities were compulsorily bought cheaply by the KMT administration and shipped to Mainland China to meet the Civil War shortages where they were sold at very high profit furthering the general shortage of goods in Taiwan.
The price of rice rose to 100 times its original value between the time the Nationalists took over to the spring of 1946, increasing to nearly four times the price in Shanghai.
It inflated further to 400 times the original price by January 1947.
Carpetbaggers from Mainland China dominated nearly all industry, as well as political and judicial offices, displacing the Taiwanese who were formerly employed.
Many of the ROC garrison troops were highly undisciplined, looting, stealing and contributing to the overall breakdown of infrastructure and public services.
Because the Taiwanese elites had met with some success with self-government under Japanese rule, they had expected the same system from the incoming ruling Chinese Nationalist Government.
However, the Chinese Nationalists opted for a different route, aiming for the centralization of government powers and a reduction in local authority.
The KMT's nation-building efforts followed this ideology because of unpleasant experiences with the centrifugal forces during the Warlord Era in 1916–1928 that had torn the government in China.
Mainland Communists were even preparing to bring down the government like the Ili Rebellion.
The different goals of the Nationalists and the Taiwanese, coupled with cultural and language misunderstandings served to further inflame tensions on both sides.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Background
During the 50 years of Japanese rule in Taiwan (1895–1945), Taiwan experienced economic development and an increased standard of living, serving as a supply base for the Japanese main islands.
After World War II, Taiwan was placed under the administrative control of the Republic of China to provide stability until a permanent arrangement could be made.
Chen Yi, the Governor-General of Taiwan, arrived on October 24, 1945, and received the last Japanese governor, Ando Rikichi, who signed the document of surrender on the next day.
Chen Yi then proclaimed the day as Retrocession Day to make Taiwan part of the Republic of China.
Taiwanese perceptions of the Japanese rule were more positive than perceptions in other parts of East and Southeast Asia.
Despite this, the Kuomintang troops from Mainland China were initially welcomed by the Taiwanese.
Their harsh conduct and the KMT maladministration quickly led to Taiwanese discontent during the immediate postwar period.
As Governor-General, Chen Yi took over and sustained the Japanese system of state monopolies in tobacco, sugar, camphor, tea, paper, chemicals, petroleum refining, mining, and cement, the same way the Nationalists treated people in other former Japanese-controlled areas (earning Chen Yi the nickname "robber").
He confiscated some 500 Japanese-owned factories and mines, and homes of former Japanese residents.
Economic mismanagement led to a large black market, runaway inflation and food shortages.
Many commodities were compulsorily bought cheaply by the KMT administration and shipped to Mainland China to meet the Civil War shortages where they were sold at very high profit furthering the general shortage of goods in Taiwan.
The price of rice rose to 100 times its original value between the time the Nationalists took over to the spring of 1946, increasing to nearly four times the price in Shanghai.
It inflated further to 400 times the original price by January 1947.
Carpetbaggers from Mainland China dominated nearly all industry, as well as political and judicial offices, displacing the Taiwanese who were formerly employed.
Many of the ROC garrison troops were highly undisciplined, looting, stealing and contributing to the overall breakdown of infrastructure and public services.
Because the Taiwanese elites had met with some success with self-government under Japanese rule, they had expected the same system from the incoming ruling Chinese Nationalist Government.
However, the Chinese Nationalists opted for a different route, aiming for the centralization of government powers and a reduction in local authority.
The KMT's nation-building efforts followed this ideology because of unpleasant experiences with the centrifugal forces during the Warlord Era in 1916–1928 that had torn the government in China.
Mainland Communists were even preparing to bring down the government like the Ili Rebellion.
The different goals of the Nationalists and the Taiwanese, coupled with cultural and language misunderstandings served to further inflame tensions on both sides.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
Re: THE FEBRUARY 28th INCIDENT
February 28 incident, continued ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uprising and crackdown
On the evening of February 27, 1947, a Tobacco Monopoly Bureau enforcement team in Taipei went to the district of Taiheichō, Twatutia, where they confiscated contraband cigarettes from a 40-year-old widow named Lin Jiang-mai at the Tianma Tea House.
When she demanded their return, one of the men struck her in the head with the butt of his gun, prompting the surrounding Taiwanese crowd to challenge the Tobacco Monopoly agents.
As they fled, one agent shot his gun into the crowd, hitting a bystander who died the next day.
The crowd, which had already been harboring feelings of frustration from unemployment, inflation, and corruption toward the Nationalist government, reached its breaking point.
The crowd protested to both the police and the gendarmes but were mostly ignored.
Protesters gathered the next morning around Taipei, calling for the arrest and trial of the agents involved in the previous day's shooting, and eventually made their way to the Governor General's Office, where security forces tried to disperse the crowd.
Soldiers opened fire into the crowd, killing at least three people.
Formosans took over the administration of the town and military bases on March 4 and forced their way into local radio station to broadcast news of the incident and calling for people to revolt, causing uprisings to erupt throughout the island.
By evening, martial law had been declared, and curfews were enforced by the arrest or shooting of anyone who violated curfew.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uprising and crackdown
On the evening of February 27, 1947, a Tobacco Monopoly Bureau enforcement team in Taipei went to the district of Taiheichō, Twatutia, where they confiscated contraband cigarettes from a 40-year-old widow named Lin Jiang-mai at the Tianma Tea House.
When she demanded their return, one of the men struck her in the head with the butt of his gun, prompting the surrounding Taiwanese crowd to challenge the Tobacco Monopoly agents.
As they fled, one agent shot his gun into the crowd, hitting a bystander who died the next day.
The crowd, which had already been harboring feelings of frustration from unemployment, inflation, and corruption toward the Nationalist government, reached its breaking point.
The crowd protested to both the police and the gendarmes but were mostly ignored.
Protesters gathered the next morning around Taipei, calling for the arrest and trial of the agents involved in the previous day's shooting, and eventually made their way to the Governor General's Office, where security forces tried to disperse the crowd.
Soldiers opened fire into the crowd, killing at least three people.
Formosans took over the administration of the town and military bases on March 4 and forced their way into local radio station to broadcast news of the incident and calling for people to revolt, causing uprisings to erupt throughout the island.
By evening, martial law had been declared, and curfews were enforced by the arrest or shooting of anyone who violated curfew.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
Re: THE FEBRUARY 28th INCIDENT
February 28 incident, continued ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uprising and crackdown, concluded ...
For several weeks after the February 28 incident, the Taiwanese civilians controlled much of Taiwan.
The initial riots were spontaneous and somewhat violent, with mainland Chinese sometimes receiving beatings from Taiwanese.
Within a few days, the Taiwanese were generally coordinated and organized, and public order in Taiwanese-held areas was upheld by volunteer civilians organized by students, and unemployed former Japanese army soldiers.
Local leaders formed a Settlement Committee, which presented the government with a list of 32 Demands for reform of the provincial administration.
They demanded, among other things, greater autonomy, free elections, the surrender of the ROC Army to the Settlement Committee, and an end to government corruption.
Motivations among the various Taiwanese groups varied; some demanded greater autonomy within the ROC, while others wanted UN trusteeship or full independence.
The Taiwanese also demanded representation in the forthcoming peace treaty negotiations with Japan, hoping to secure a plebiscite to determine the island's political future.
Outside of Taipei, there were examples of the formation of local militias such as the 27 Brigade near Taichung.
In Chiayi, the mayor's residence was set on fire and local militias fought with the military police.
The Nationalist Government, under Chen Yi, stalled for time while it waited for reinforcements from Fujian.
Upon their arrival on March 8, the ROC troops launched a crackdown.
The New York Times reported, "An American who had just arrived in China from Taihoku said that troops from the mainland China arrived there on March 7 and indulged in three days of indiscriminate killing and looting."
"For a time everyone seen on the streets was shot at, homes were broken into and occupants killed."
"In the poorer sections the streets were said to have been littered with dead."
"There were instances of beheadings and mutilation of bodies, and women were raped, the American said."
By the end of March, Chen Yi had ordered the imprisonment or execution of the leading Taiwanese organizers he could identify.
His troops reportedly executed, according to a Taiwanese delegation in Nanjing, between 3,000 and 4,000 people throughout the island.
The exact number is still undetermined, as only 300 Taiwanese families applied for another compensation as recently as 1990.
Detailed records kept by the KMT have been reported as "lost".
Some of the killings were random, while others were systematic.
Taiwanese elites were among those targeted, and many of the Taiwanese who had formed self-governing groups during the reign of the Japanese were also victims of the 228 incident.
A disproportionate number of the victims were Taiwanese high school students.
Many had recently served in the Imperial Japanese Army, having volunteered to serve to maintain order.
Some Taiwan political organizations participated in the uprising, for example Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League, was announced "communist" and illegal.
Many members were arrested and executed.
Some of these organizations had to move to Hong Kong.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uprising and crackdown, concluded ...
For several weeks after the February 28 incident, the Taiwanese civilians controlled much of Taiwan.
The initial riots were spontaneous and somewhat violent, with mainland Chinese sometimes receiving beatings from Taiwanese.
Within a few days, the Taiwanese were generally coordinated and organized, and public order in Taiwanese-held areas was upheld by volunteer civilians organized by students, and unemployed former Japanese army soldiers.
Local leaders formed a Settlement Committee, which presented the government with a list of 32 Demands for reform of the provincial administration.
They demanded, among other things, greater autonomy, free elections, the surrender of the ROC Army to the Settlement Committee, and an end to government corruption.
Motivations among the various Taiwanese groups varied; some demanded greater autonomy within the ROC, while others wanted UN trusteeship or full independence.
The Taiwanese also demanded representation in the forthcoming peace treaty negotiations with Japan, hoping to secure a plebiscite to determine the island's political future.
Outside of Taipei, there were examples of the formation of local militias such as the 27 Brigade near Taichung.
In Chiayi, the mayor's residence was set on fire and local militias fought with the military police.
The Nationalist Government, under Chen Yi, stalled for time while it waited for reinforcements from Fujian.
Upon their arrival on March 8, the ROC troops launched a crackdown.
The New York Times reported, "An American who had just arrived in China from Taihoku said that troops from the mainland China arrived there on March 7 and indulged in three days of indiscriminate killing and looting."
"For a time everyone seen on the streets was shot at, homes were broken into and occupants killed."
"In the poorer sections the streets were said to have been littered with dead."
"There were instances of beheadings and mutilation of bodies, and women were raped, the American said."
By the end of March, Chen Yi had ordered the imprisonment or execution of the leading Taiwanese organizers he could identify.
His troops reportedly executed, according to a Taiwanese delegation in Nanjing, between 3,000 and 4,000 people throughout the island.
The exact number is still undetermined, as only 300 Taiwanese families applied for another compensation as recently as 1990.
Detailed records kept by the KMT have been reported as "lost".
Some of the killings were random, while others were systematic.
Taiwanese elites were among those targeted, and many of the Taiwanese who had formed self-governing groups during the reign of the Japanese were also victims of the 228 incident.
A disproportionate number of the victims were Taiwanese high school students.
Many had recently served in the Imperial Japanese Army, having volunteered to serve to maintain order.
Some Taiwan political organizations participated in the uprising, for example Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League, was announced "communist" and illegal.
Many members were arrested and executed.
Some of these organizations had to move to Hong Kong.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
Re: THE FEBRUARY 28th INCIDENT
February 28 incident, concluded ...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legacy
The initial 228 purge was followed by 38 years of martial law, commonly referred to as the "White Terror," which lasted until the end of 1987, during which over a 100,000 people were imprisoned for political reasons of which over 1,000 were executed.
During this time, discussion of the incident was taboo.
The government hoped that the execution of Governor Chen Yi and financial compensation for the victims had quelled resentment.
In the 1970s, the 228 Justice and Peace Movement was initiated by several citizens' groups to ask for a reversal of this policy, and, in 1992, the Executive Yuan promulgated the "February 28 Incident Research Report."
Then-President and KMT-chairman Lee Teng-hui, who had participated in the incident and was arrested as an instigator and a Communist sympathizer, made a formal apology on behalf of the government in 1995 and declared February 28 a day to commemorate the victims.
Among other memorials erected, Taipei New Park was renamed 228 Memorial Park.
Since the lifting of martial law in 1987, the government has set up the 228 Incident Memorial Foundation, a civilian reparations fund supported by public donations for the victims and their families.
Many descendants of victims remain unaware that their family members were victims, while many of the families of victims from Mainland China did not know the details of their relatives' mistreatment during the riot.
Those who have received compensation more than two times are demanding trials of the still-living soldiers and officials who were responsible for the summary executions and deaths of their loved ones.
Prior to the 228 massacres, many Taiwanese hoped for greater autonomy from China.
The failure of conclusive dialogue with the ROC administration in early March, combined with the feelings of betrayal felt towards the government and China, in general, are widely believed to have catalyzed today's Taiwan Independence movement and subsequently the Taiwan Name Rectification Campaign after democratization.
On February 28, 2004, thousands of Taiwanese participated in the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally.
They formed a 500-kilometer (310 mi) long human chain from Taiwan's northernmost city to its southern tip to commemorate the 228 incident, to call for peace, and to protest the People's Republic of China's deployment of missiles aimed at Taiwan along the coast of Taiwan Strait.
In 2006, the Research Report on Responsibility for the 228 Massacre was released after several years of research.
The 2006 report was not intended to overlap with the prior (1992) 228 Massacre Research Report commissioned by the Executive Yuan.
Chiang Kai-shek is specifically named as bearing the largest responsibility in the 2006 report.
However, some hardline academics have tried to confuse these conclusions, stating the departing Japanese colonial government was responsible by creating food shortages and causing inflation.
In 1990, Taiwan's Executive Yuan set up a task force to investigate the 2/28 Incident.
The Report of the 228 Incident was published in 1992, and a memorial was set up in 1995 at the 2/28 Peace Park in Taipei.
In October 1995, the state-funded Memorial Foundation of 228 was initially established to distribute compensation and award rehabilitation certificates to 228 Incident victims in order to restore their reputation.
Family members of dead and missing victims are eligible for NT$6 million (approximately US$190,077).
Compensation application trial statistics, according to Memorial Foundation of 228 (www.228.org.tw), almost 24 years later, as of June 25, 2019:
Number of cases accepted: 2,857
Number of cases reviewed: 2,823
Number of cases established: 2,319
Death cases: 686
Missing cases: 181
Detention, imprisoned, etc.: 1,452
Number of cases not established: 504
Inconsistent legal requirements: 301
Insufficient evidence: 203
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legacy
The initial 228 purge was followed by 38 years of martial law, commonly referred to as the "White Terror," which lasted until the end of 1987, during which over a 100,000 people were imprisoned for political reasons of which over 1,000 were executed.
During this time, discussion of the incident was taboo.
The government hoped that the execution of Governor Chen Yi and financial compensation for the victims had quelled resentment.
In the 1970s, the 228 Justice and Peace Movement was initiated by several citizens' groups to ask for a reversal of this policy, and, in 1992, the Executive Yuan promulgated the "February 28 Incident Research Report."
Then-President and KMT-chairman Lee Teng-hui, who had participated in the incident and was arrested as an instigator and a Communist sympathizer, made a formal apology on behalf of the government in 1995 and declared February 28 a day to commemorate the victims.
Among other memorials erected, Taipei New Park was renamed 228 Memorial Park.
Since the lifting of martial law in 1987, the government has set up the 228 Incident Memorial Foundation, a civilian reparations fund supported by public donations for the victims and their families.
Many descendants of victims remain unaware that their family members were victims, while many of the families of victims from Mainland China did not know the details of their relatives' mistreatment during the riot.
Those who have received compensation more than two times are demanding trials of the still-living soldiers and officials who were responsible for the summary executions and deaths of their loved ones.
Prior to the 228 massacres, many Taiwanese hoped for greater autonomy from China.
The failure of conclusive dialogue with the ROC administration in early March, combined with the feelings of betrayal felt towards the government and China, in general, are widely believed to have catalyzed today's Taiwan Independence movement and subsequently the Taiwan Name Rectification Campaign after democratization.
On February 28, 2004, thousands of Taiwanese participated in the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally.
They formed a 500-kilometer (310 mi) long human chain from Taiwan's northernmost city to its southern tip to commemorate the 228 incident, to call for peace, and to protest the People's Republic of China's deployment of missiles aimed at Taiwan along the coast of Taiwan Strait.
In 2006, the Research Report on Responsibility for the 228 Massacre was released after several years of research.
The 2006 report was not intended to overlap with the prior (1992) 228 Massacre Research Report commissioned by the Executive Yuan.
Chiang Kai-shek is specifically named as bearing the largest responsibility in the 2006 report.
However, some hardline academics have tried to confuse these conclusions, stating the departing Japanese colonial government was responsible by creating food shortages and causing inflation.
In 1990, Taiwan's Executive Yuan set up a task force to investigate the 2/28 Incident.
The Report of the 228 Incident was published in 1992, and a memorial was set up in 1995 at the 2/28 Peace Park in Taipei.
In October 1995, the state-funded Memorial Foundation of 228 was initially established to distribute compensation and award rehabilitation certificates to 228 Incident victims in order to restore their reputation.
Family members of dead and missing victims are eligible for NT$6 million (approximately US$190,077).
Compensation application trial statistics, according to Memorial Foundation of 228 (www.228.org.tw), almost 24 years later, as of June 25, 2019:
Number of cases accepted: 2,857
Number of cases reviewed: 2,823
Number of cases established: 2,319
Death cases: 686
Missing cases: 181
Detention, imprisoned, etc.: 1,452
Number of cases not established: 504
Inconsistent legal requirements: 301
Insufficient evidence: 203