ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post Reply
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 3, 2021

OP-Ed: On the political overthrow of Donald J. Trump


Op-Ed by Paul Plante

I would like to begin this thread on the political overthrow of American president Donald J. Trump with a link to a video of Joe Biden, now the president, delivering on 31 August 2020 what I consider to be the most toxic and divisive political speech in a presidential race I have ever heard in this country in over seventy years on the globe as an American citizen, and I would ask you to watch just the first 1:23 minutes, watching Joe and listening to his actual words, to wit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZU4weRWnaAE

And before people start freaking out and screeching and moaning about some “tin-hat” conspiracy theory, the word “overthrow” when used as a noun, as I am using it, means “a removal from power; a defeat or downfall,” which is exactly what happened to Trump just months after Joe Biden made that highly toxic political speech, which I will further aver is the direct cause of the violence at the Capitol on 6 January 2021, because Joe provoked that violence with that 31 August 2020 speech, this just seventeen (17) days before Joe was quoted making more highly provocative statements intended to provoke violence in a Daily Wire story entitled “Joe Biden Calls Trump Supporters ‘Virulent People,’ The ‘Dregs Of Society'” by Joseph Curl on September 17, 2018, where we had this hate spew from the DIVIDER, Joe Biden, to wit:

Joe Biden just had his “deplorables” moment.

end quotes

That of course is a reference to divisive and provocative comments made by Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign when she called “half” of Trump’s supporters “deplorables,” to wit:

“To just be grossly generalistic, you can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables,” Clinton said in September 2016.

“Right?”

“Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.”

end quotes

Provocative fighting words, people, intended to provoke violence, and provoke they did on 6 January 2021, as not only the nation, but the world, watched the backlash from those fighting words erupt in Washington, D.C., when Hillary Clinton’s Electoral College vote for Joe Biden was about to be challenged, and then, never was.

Getting back to Joe on 17 September 2020, the Daily Wire article continues, as follows:

Biden, who says he’ll decided in January whether to run for president in 2020 but who is making all the moves of a presidential candidate, used a pro-LGBT Human Rights Campaign annual dinner on Saturday to rip President Trump.

And in so doing, Biden had a moment reminiscent of Hillary Clinton, when she called Trump supporters “deplorables.”

Biden did his old act, starting off soft and avuncular before booming through his power points, punching the air and flailing about.

end quotes

Which thought takes us to this video of another world leader booming through his power points, punching the air and flailing about, and watch this one without the sound on, to wit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ3N_2r6R-o

end quotes

As history has proven twice now, that truly is a very effective, attention-getting style, which is why Joe employs it, it having already been time-tested and proven effective as a political tool for someone bent of the overthrow of his political opponents, as Joe Biden was clearly intent on the overthrow of Donald J. Trump in his toxic speech to the nation and world on 31 August 2020 in the video above, which takes us back again to 17 September 2020, to wit:

“Despite losing in the courts, and in the court of opinion, these forces of intolerance remain determined to undermine and roll back the progress you all have made,” he said.

“This time they — not you — have an ally in the White House.”

“This time they have an ally.”

“They’re a small percentage of the American people — virulent people, some of them the dregs of society.”

“And instead of using the full might of the executive branch to secure justice, dignity, safety for all, the president uses the White House as the literal — literal — bully pulpit, callously — callously — exerting his power over those who have little or none.”

Biden got himself lathered up into a full froth as he waxed poetic about his and “Barack’s” thoughts on Trump.

“Barack and I agreed to remain silent for a while to give this administration the chance to get up and running in the first year,” Biden said.

“God forgive me,” he added, making the sign of the cross as the audience applauded.

“Those who try to excuse this kind of prejudice in the name of culture, I say, ‘Prejudice is prejudice and humanity is humanity — it is a crime,'” Biden said, urging those in the room to continue to oppose Trump.

“Our work is not yet done by any stretch of the imagination.”

“The stakes are much too high.”

And then he went even further.

“This is deadly earnest, we are in a fight for America’s soul,” Biden said.

end quotes

And since it was really a FIGHT FOR AMERICA’S SOUL, as opposed to a mere presidential election, it became necessary for Joe Biden to pull out all the stops and crank up his well-oiled political machine to overthrow the evil regime of Donald J. Trump, no matter what it took, because people, it was a fight to the finish that only one man could walk away after, and that man going to be Joe Biden, no matter what it took, because when the SOUL OF AMERICA was what was at stake, it was the right thing to do.

And the violence Joe Biden provoked on 6 January 2021 with his hate-filled rhetoric one hundred twenty-eight (128) earlier on 31 August 2020 was icing on the cake for Joe and the Democrats, which brings us to this House Resolution that never could have been but for Joe Biden provoking that violence, to wit:

H.Res.503 – Establishing the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.

117th Congress (2021-2022)

Sponsor: Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-12] (Introduced 06/28/2021)

In the House of Representatives, U. S., June 30, 2021.

Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted in multiple deaths, physical harm to over 140 members of law enforcement, and terror and trauma among staff, institutional employees, press, and Members;

Whereas, on January 27, 2021, the Department of Homeland Security issued a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin that due to the “heightened threat environment across the United States,” in which “Some ideologically-motivated violent extremists with objections to the exercise of governmental authority and the presidential transition, as well as other perceived grievances fueled by false narratives, could continue to mobilize to incite or commit violence.”

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.

There is hereby established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (hereinafter referred to as the “Select Committee”).

end quotes

Enter the WITCH HUNTERS, people, and see just how slick a political operation this really was?

Provoke violence and then blame it on your opponent!

Why?

Because it works, quite well, actually!

Just ask Joe Biden – he’ll tell you its so!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... p/#respond
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 4, 2021 AT 9:06 PM

Paul Plante says:

Since the events herein have taken place within the memory of living men, this book may be regarded as contemporary history.

To some historians such a description in itself is sufficient reason to read no further; others, sensitive to the momentous character of these years of turmoil, believe it not only permissible but desirable to chronicle the present, and even to dub what they have written, “history.”

The writer, it is evident, is sympathetic to their point of view.

He is, of course, aware that much of what he has written is not definitive.

On the other hand the revolutionary tempo of this present hour and the bitter death of young men everywhere in this global maelstrom are facts which need recording by one who breathes the atmosphere of 1943.

end quotes

The above are words from the Preface of “World Wars And Revolutions” by Walter Phelps Hall, PhD, of Princeton, copyrighted 1943, while the world war to overthrow the rug-chewing madman shown in the video above here (no, not Joe Biden, the other one) was still raging and consuming lives in its inferno, which times people today in this country are largely unaware of, because they happened more than a few minutes ago, and anyway, the past is irrelevant, because it is the past, and everything that is happening is happening right now, so who cares about two minutes ago, and there we are.

I quote those above words from that Preface, especially about contemporary history, which is exactly what we are talking about in here, because they explain so well my personal motives for writing this piece and asking the Cape Charles Mirror, a traditional Grand Palladium of Liberty, to publish them, which brings me back in time to November 28, 1787 and the Philadelphiensis II political essay by Philadelphiensis, wherein he stated as follows, to wit:

Ah! my countrymen, our situation is critical indeed!

Let us make a solemn pause then!

The eyes of the world are upon us; the patriots and friends of America, in Europe, are now anxiously concerned, lest the whirlwind of tyranny should raze from its tender root the hallowed plant of Columbian liberty.

end quotes

Think about that, people – words from two hundred thirty-four (234) years ago and how apt they are again today where once again, patriots and friends of America are anxiously concerned lest the whirlwind of Democrat tyranny should raze from its tender root the hallowed plant of Columbian liberty.

At the conclusion of that essay, the author stated thusly, to wit:

I shall close this essay with one observation, viz. that should this despotic scheme of government be overthrown, (which God grant) to what cause then are we to attribute this glorious triumph?

The answer is obvious – to that palladium of liberty, that inestimable privilege of freemen, that scourge of tyranny, the freedom of the press.

end quotes

Enter the Cape Charles Mirror.

As to the despotic scheme of government those who love liberty would like to see “overthrown,” just as Donald J. Trump was effectively overthrown on 3 January 2021 when Democrat tyrant and despot Nancy Pelosi was quoted in an article in The Hill entitled “Pelosi sets up call on election challenge: ‘No situation matches Trump presidency’” by Joseph Choi on 01/03/21, where she said the result would end with President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris being “officially declared the next President and Vice President of the United States,” but acknowledged this declaration might have to take place in “the middle of the night,” let us go to 27 July 2021 and the January 6 House Select Committee Hearing Investigation Day 1 Full Transcript, where we have as follows:

Officer Hodges: I think Fanone hit the nail on the head there.

As patrol Officers, we can only deal with the crimes that happen on the streets, the misdemeanors, and occasionally the violent felonies, but you guys are the only ones we’ve got to deal with crimes that occur above us.

And I need you guys to address if anyone in power had a role in this, if anyone in power coordinated, were aided or abetted or tried to downplay, tried to prevent the investigation of this terrorist attack, because we can’t do it.

We’re not allowed to.

And I think a majority of Americans are really looking forward to that as well.

end quotes

And let’s focus in on this one sentence, to wit: As patrol Officers, we can only deal with the crimes that happen on the streets, the misdemeanors, and occasionally the violent felonies, but you guys are the only ones we’ve got to deal with crimes that occur above us.

end quotes

“You guys are the only ones we’ve got to deal with crimes that occur above us,” where “you guys” are the members of Nancy Pelosi’s WITCH HUNTERS COMMITTEE, including Virginia’s Elaine Luria?

Since when, people, and we’re back in seventh grade civics here, since when did the House of Representatives become a law enforcement agency?

And that thought takes us to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), No. 261, argued March 7, 1957, decided June 17, 1957, where we had from the Court as follows, to wit:

There is no general authority to expose the private affairs of individuals without justification in terms of the functions of the Congress … nor is the Congress a law enforcement or trial agency.

These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government.

No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a
legitimate task of the Congress.

end quotes

In that case, Petitioner was convicted of a violation of 2 U.S.C. § 192, which makes it a misdemeanor for any person summoned as a witness by either House of Congress or any committee thereof to refuse to answer any question “pertinent to the question under inquiry.”

Summoned to testify before a Subcommittee of the House of Representatives Committee on Un-American Activities, petitioner testified freely about his own activities and associations, but he refused to answer questions as to whether he had known certain other persons to have been members of the Communist Party.

He based his refusal on the ground that those questions were outside of the proper scope of the Committee’s activities, and not relevant to its work.

No clear understanding of the “question under inquiry” could be gleaned from the resolution authorizing the full Committee, the legislative history thereof, the Committee’s practices thereunder, the action authorizing the Subcommittee, the statement of the Chairman at the opening of the hearings or his statement in response to petitioner’s protest.

Held: Petitioner was not accorded a fair opportunity to determine whether he was within his rights in refusing to answer, and his conviction was invalid under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

So, people, if the Congress, and in this case, specifically, the Pelosi-ite “select committee,” are not a law enforcement or trial agency, which are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government, when did “you guys” on the select committee, including Elaine Luria, become the only ones we, the American people, have got to deal with crimes that occur above the patrol officers at the Capitol who can only deal with the crimes that happen on the streets, the misdemeanors, and occasionally the violent felonies?

Since Nancy Pelosi gave them the power to be a law enforcement or trial agency?

But if OUR Constitution does not give that law enforcement or trial agency power to Congress in the first place, then where did Nancy get the power from to give the WITCH HUNTERS the power to be a law enforcement and trial agency with respect to matters concerning 6 January 2021 and the riot Joe Biden provoked with his hate speech above here on 31 August 2020?

Going back to Watkins, Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court, stating as follows:.

This is a review by certiorari of a conviction under 2 U.S.C. § 192, 2 U.S.C.A. § 192 for ‘contempt of Congress.’

The misdemeanor is alleged to have been committed during a hearing before a congressional investigating committee.

It is not the case of a truculent or contumacious witness who refuses to answer all questions or who, by boisterous or discourteous conduct, disturbs the decorum of the committee room.

Petitioner was prosecuted for refusing to make certain disclosures which he asserted to be beyond the authority of the committee to demand.

The controversy thus rests upon fundamental principles of the power of the Congress and the limitations upon that power.

We approach the questions presented with conscious awareness of the far-reaching ramifications that can follow from a decision of this nature.

We start with several basic premises on which there is general agreement.

The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process.

That power is broad.

It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes.

It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them.

It comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste.

But, broad as is this power of inquiry, it is not unlimited.

Investigations conducted solely for the personal aggrandizement of the investigators or to ‘punish’ those investigated are indefensible.

Abuses of the investigative process may imperceptibly lead to abridgment of protected freedoms.

The mere summoning of a witness and compelling him to testify, against his will, about his beliefs, expressions or associations is a measure of governmental interference.

And when those forced revelations concern matters that are unorthodox, unpopular, or even hateful to the general public, the reaction in the life of the witness may be disastrous.

This effect is even more harsh when it is past beliefs, expressions or associations that are disclosed and judged by current standards rather than those contemporary with the matters exposed.

Nor does the witness alone suffer the consequences.

Those who are identified by witnesses and thereby placed in the same glare of publicity are equally subject to public stigma, scorn and obloquy.

Beyond that, there is the more subtle and immeasurable effect upon those who tend to adhere to the most orthodox and uncontroversial views and associations in order to avoid a similar fate at some future time.

That this impact is partly the result of non-governmental activity by private persons cannot relieve the investigators of their responsibility for initiating the reaction.

end quotes

So what game is really afoot here, people?

What legislative purpose is this WITCH HUNTER’s committee serving?

Clearly, the Democrats including Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi had far more to gain politically from the 6 January 2021 “riots” at the Capitol than did Donald Trump and his Republican allies, just as Hitler had far more to gain from the Reichstag fire on February 27, 1933 than did the Communists who were accused of setting the fire, as we see in the Official Speech on the Enabling Act to the Reichstag in Berlin, March 23, 1933, where Hitler stated thusly:

Ladies and Gentlemen of the German Reichstag!

By agreement with the Reich Government, today the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and the German National People’s Party have presented to you for resolution a notice of motion concerning a “Law for Removing the Distress of Volk and Reich.”

end quotes

That “Law for Removing the Distress of Volk and Reich” suspended the Constitutional rights of the German people across the board, and let us not forget that at that time when those Constitutional rights in Germany were suspended, Germany was a DEMOCRACY!

So, Donald Trump has been overthrown and history has been made.

But what have we lost in the exchange?

An existential question for our times!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-438693
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 9, 2021 AT 6:38 PM

Paul Plante says:

So, is RULE OF LAW important in a modern civilized society?

Should it be?

Or has it become an obstacle, an impediment, a hindrance or obstruction in doing something good and necessary for the American people, ham-stringing those who would rule us for our own good in our HOUR OF DIRE NEED for law and order in America, as was stated so clearly and elegantly by Nancy Pelosi in House Resolution 503 – Establishing the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol sponsored Nancy herself in the House of Representatives, on June 30, 2021, where Nancy spelled out our HOUR OF DIRE NEED for law and order in America in that history-making House Resolution, as follows:

Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted in multiple deaths, physical harm to over 140 members of law enforcement, and terror and trauma among staff, institutional employees, press, and Members;

There is hereby established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (hereinafter referred to as the “Select Committee”).

end quotes

Think about that for a moment, people – in the aftermath of one of the darkest days of our democracy, the last one being back in 1812, or something like that, when insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted in terror and trauma among the press and Democrat Members of Congress, do we really want RULE OF LAW getting in the way of severe punishment of those who really need to be punished, and punished harshly for that insurrection?

In the aftermath of one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted terror and trauma among the press, and Democrat Members of Congress, isn’t it really necessary to set aside RULE OF LAW for the time being, lest those accused of insurrection and terrorism are able to use the law to evade punishment for their crimes?

Now, as we ponder that question in the light of the fact that Nancy Pelosi has already suspended RULE OF LAW, for our own good, think back to fifth grade civics, and these Essential Questions we were supposed to be able to answer when we were children, to wit:

What is justice?

In what ways does the Rule of Law apply to impartiality of the courts?

Are the processes in place in democracy designed to “level” individual bias in the court system effective?

Why or why not?

Should one’s “character” influence judicial decisions?

Why or why not?

Back then, and of course, this is pre-January 6th, which has changed everything forever, making everything before January 6th, including RULE OF LAW, obsolete, as pre-January 6th fifth grade students, we were all supposed to be able to analyze the impartial role of judges, and understand the purpose of the Rule of Law as evidenced by discussion of the following, to wit:

What does it mean to have an impartial judiciary?

What does the Rule of Law have to do with impartiality?

Give a specific example of how the Rule of Law and impartiality might have an effect on you if it were not in place.

end quotes

And that last question from our grade school days back when about of how the Rule of Law and impartiality might have an effect on all of us if they were not in place, brings us to today, where in fact, the Rule of Law and impartiality are no longer in place, for the good of society, afterall, given that on January 6th, more than likely the absolute darkest of all the previous darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted terror and trauma among the press, and Democrat Members of Congress.

By suspending RULE OF LAW and impartiality, which everyone knows always favor the guilty criminals, and by transferring judicial authority to punish those it knows to be offenders to the Select Committee, aren’t we going to be able to build back better a lot sooner than if the courts were to get involved in trying to punish these insurrectionists who dared to attempt to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election, so that by suspending RULE OF LAW, and giving Congress the power to punish the offenders, aren’t we really going to end up being safer sooner than what the alternatives would offer?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-442482
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 12, 2021 AT 6:32 PM

Paul Plante says:

If I were to ask my little granddaughter what made the 2020 presidential election unique in our history of presidential elections, and thus, a truly historical event like the contested presidential election of 1824, where on February 9, 1825, the House of Representatives elected John Quincy Adams as President following an inconclusive Electoral College result, where according to its own history of the event, the House performed the constitutionally prescribed role of deciding the 1824 presidential election, it would be that in this case, it was Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi ALONE who decided the 2020 presidential election, handing the position to Joseph Biden, citing special circumstances as her justification, as we clearly saw in an article in THE HILL entitled “Pelosi sets up call on election challenge: ‘No situation matches Trump presidency’” by Joseph Choi on 01/03/21, where we had as follows:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a Sunday letter told her Democratic colleagues they would discuss the process for expected challenges to the Electoral College results from House Republicans during a call on Monday.

“Over the years, we have experienced many challenges in the House, but no situation matches the Trump presidency and the Trump disrespect for the will of the people,” Pelosi wrote in her letter.

Pelosi outlined a plan for the Democratic lawmakers as they prepare to certify the Electoral College votes this week.

More than 100 House Republicans are expected to challenge the results of the election in various battleground states, and a dozen Senate Republicans have vowed to do so.

She said the result would end with President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris being “officially declared the next President and Vice President of the United States,” but acknowledged this declaration might have to take place in “the middle of the night.”

end quotes

And so we had the political overthrow of American president Donald J. Trump by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, something which has never before occurred in our history as a nation, that being the Speaker of the House taking into her own hands deciding the outcome of a presidential election in this nation because people, no situation matched the Trump presidency, and if that is not a reason to overthrow a sitting American president, then nothing will be, and where will our democracy be then?

And again, the word “overthrow” as used in here, when used as a noun, as I am using it, means “a removal from power; a defeat or downfall,” which is exactly what happened to Trump just months after Joe Biden made the highly toxic political speech in the original post denouncing Trump on 31 August 2020, which I aver is the direct cause of the violence at the Capitol on 6 January 2021 that Nancy Pelosi is calling an insurrection, violence clearly provoked by Joe Biden, which is now being blamed on the Republican party, just as the Communists were blamed en masse by Adolph Hitler for the Reichstag Fire and were placed in concentration camps as a result, which takes us to the question of does history really matter?

In this HOUR OF DIRE NEED in the United States of America today as a result of what Nancy Pelosi calls an insurrection at the Capitol on 6 January 2021, and if anyone should know what an insurrection is, it would be Nancy, because she is the one who makes the laws saying what an insurrection is, should we really be looking into our own national history, or world history, for that matter, for comparisons, like the Reichstag Fire in Germany that resulted in the end of DEMOCRACY in Germany, for the good of the nation, of course, as is the case again here in the United States of America, and its replacement by a dictatorship?

Shouldn’t we just trust Nancy?

Isn’t that why we have her in there as Speaker of the House in the first place – to protect us from presidents like Donald Trump?

And if the Constitution had to be set aside, just this once, of course, because no situation in our entire history as a nation has ever matched the Trump presidency, shouldn’t we just accept that as the way things really had to be, this time, which is different than all the other times?

And if it is necessary for Nancy Pelosi to suppress the Republican party the way Hitler suppressed the German Nationalist Party, along with the Communist Party and Social Democrats “who threaten the security of the state,” like Nancy says the Republicans threaten the security of the United States of America, and again, she would know these kinds of things, which is why she is the Speaker of the House of Representatives instead of somebody else, don’t we have a duty to believe her and support her, as GOOD AMERICANS?

If it is necessary to suspend our Constitutional rights for a time, and RULE OF LAW, while Nancy makes sure the insurrection of 6 January 2021 can never happen again, isn’t it our duty as GOOD AMERICANS to not question her, or to cast doubt on what her motives might be?

And in the meantime, if for the good of the nation, Nancy in her wisdom deems it necessary to create a Malicious Practices Act that makes it a crime to speak out against the new Biden government or criticize its leaders, and makes even the smallest expression of dissent a crime, so that those accused of “gossiping” or “making fun” of government officials like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden can be arrested and sent to prison or a concentration camp, shouldn’t we be happy and feel blessed that we have someone in power over us who loves us so much she would suspend our Constitutional rights to protect us until she can finally end the threat and menace the Republicans mean to our democracy?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-444349
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 14, 2021 AT 8:47 PM

Paul Plante says:

And once again, to be clear in here, when I use the term “contemporary history,” regardless of what the academics might try to call it, I am referring to documented events that have taken place within the memory of living men, and women, of course, as the author used the term in the Preface of World Wars And Revolutions by Walter Phelps Hall, PhD, of Princeton, copyrighted 1943, which contemporary history in that case was that period of time between June 28, 1914, when Austrian Archduke Francis Ferdinand was shot at Sarajevo in the Balkans and 1943, when WWII was raging in Europe, detailing the events which occurred between those two dates as an explanation of how WWII came to be, despite a belief at the end of WWI that there would never be another world war, to wit:

WHY WAR WAS THOUGHT OUTMODED

On June 28, 1914, an Austrian archduke was shot at Sarajevo in the Balkans and within five weeks the greater part of Europe was at war.

Four years later, the German Reich, hampered by impotent allies, lamed by empty stomachs, hammered by Foch’s armies, ceased to be.

The German High Command had lost their war; and many, blinded by victory and confused by rejoicing well-nigh universal, believed all war banished from the world.

Instead, within one generation, in a short twenty years, a murkier and more murderous hurricane than that of 1914 came roaring out of Central Europe, to sweep every ocean, to engulf continents.

The war of 1914-18, the first World War, burst on a relatively unsuspecting world.

Few even of the statesmen of that day were convinced of its coming.

True, in 1911, 1912, and in 1913 there had been little wars involving European countries.

That trifling and semi-comic conflict between Italians and Turks in 1911, involving Libyan oases, did not really threaten Europe’s peace; and the two Balkan wars of 1912 and 1913, though bloody enough to satisfy Tamerlane, seemed far away from the main currents of European civilization.

Certain savants held that these might even be considered harbingers of coming world peace, since in less enlightened times such frontier wars might well have involved one or more of the great powers, all of whom were now too sagacious to draw the sword.

end quotes

But obviously as we can see from our perspective many years later, the so-called “great powers” were not sagacious, at all, and so we had another world war, which brings us up to the beginning of the contemporary American history I am going to rely on here, a history which begins with Martin Dies Jr. (November 5, 1900 – November 14, 1972), like Nancy Pelosi and the majority of her WITCH HUNTERS including Virginia’s own tough-talking Elaine Luria, a Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives, who served as the first chairman of the Special Committee to Investigate Un-American Activities (HUAC) from 1937 through 1944 (Seventy-fifth through Seventy-eighth Congresses), and the United States Supreme Court case of John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, which is especially relevant today as it was just announced on the news that Nancy’s WITCH HUNTERS are going to hold Steve Bannon, a common American citizen, not a member of the Trump administration, in CONTEMPT, a serious misdemeanor, ​to demonstrate exactly how far off the reservation Nancy Pelosi and her WITCH HUNTERS are now straying, as they take RULE OF LAW in this country and stuff it down the toilet to replace it with RULE OF NANCY, instead.

By way of background, Dies and Samuel Dickstein created the House Committee Investigating Un-American Activities, initially nicknamed the Dies Committee, later becoming HUAC in 1946.

Dies was its first chairman, serving for seven years from 1938 to 1944, and like Nancy Pelosi and her WITCH HUNTERS are doing again today, he declared a crusade against what he termed “right-wing subversives” in the government, and other organizations nationwide.

As to Samuel Dickstein (February 5, 1885 – April 22, 1954), like Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskin and Elaine Luria, as good a Democrat as they come, he was a Democratic Congressional Representative from New York (22-year tenure), a New York State Supreme Court Justice, and a Soviet spy (isn’t history just great) who played a key role in establishing the committee that would become the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which he used to attack fascists.

Dickstein was named in the 1990s as a Soviet agent in the Venona project materials and in 1999, authors Allen Weinstein and Alexander Vassiliev learned that Soviet files indicate that Dickstein was a paid agent of the NKVD, but a good Democrat through and through, nonetheless.

And here is where we have a great story from out of the annals of Democrat history involving Shirley Temple and Hollywood to show just how far out of control these rabid Democrat WITCH HUNTERS like Nancy Pelosi’s crew can go.

Now, while there had been earlier Congressional hearings on communist and Nazi activity, such as by Hamilton Fish in 1932 and McCormack and Dickstein in 1934, the Dies Committee hearings captured greater public attention and scrutiny and in 1938, the Committee was criticized for including Shirley Temple, who was 10 years old at the time, on a list of Hollywood figures who sent greetings to the leftist Communist-owned French newspaper, Ce Soir.

The Roosevelt Administration mentioned the attacks when Harold Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, stated: “They have found dangerous radicals there led by little Shirley Temple.”

Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins added that Shirley Temple was born an American Citizen and should not have to debate such “preposterous revelations”.

To bring this to a close before it gets overlong, the Supreme Court case of Watkins is directly relevant to what is occurring today in the United States of America with these Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS running amuck and trampling the rights of each and every one of us, because this isn’t just about Trump, into the muck and slime of the Washington, D.C. swamp, for this following language, to wit:

In the decade following World War II, there appeared a new kind of congressional inquiry unknown in prior periods of American history.

Principally this was the result of the various investigations into the threat of subversion of the United States Government, but other subjects of congressional interest also contributed to the changed scene.

This new phase of legislative inquiry involved a broad-scale intrusion into the lives and affairs of private citizens.

It brought before the courts novel questions of the appropriate limits of congressional inquiry.

Abuses of the investigative process may imperceptibly lead to abridgment of protected freedoms.

Kilbourn v. Thompson teaches that such an investigation into individual affairs is invalid if unrelated to any legislative purpose.

That is beyond the powers conferred upon the Congress in the Constitution.

United States v. Rumely makes it plain that the mere semblance of legislative purpose would not justify an inquiry in the face of the Bill of Rights.

The critical element is the existence of, and the weight to be ascribed to, the interest of the Congress in demanding disclosures from an unwilling witness.

We cannot simply assume, however, that every congressional investigation is justified by a public need that overbalances any private rights affected.

To do so would be to abdicate the responsibility placed by the Constitution upon the judiciary to insure that the Congress does not unjustifiably encroach upon an individual’s right to privacy nor abridge his liberty of speech, press, religion or assembly.

We have no doubt that there is no congressional power to expose for the sake of exposure.

The public is, of entitled to be informed concerning the workings of its government.

That cannot be inflated into a general power to expose where the predominant result can only be an invasion of the private rights of individuals.

end quotes

And yet, especially in the case of Bannon, that is exactly what these Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS are doing, and as reviled as Bannon may be by some, the fact is that he is an American citizen, not a member of the executive branch of our government, and what these Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS can get away with doing to him can in turn be done to any of us, and that should be a matter of concern to every LOYAL AMERICAN out there regardless of political affiliation, so please, stay tuned.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-445642
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 17, 2021 AT 10:54 PM

Paul Plante says:

Bizarre Beyond Belief (BBB), people, is all that can be said for this Biden-esque CIRCUS going on in the putrid swamp of Washington. D.C., a waste of otherwise perfectly good swampland in what was once a part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and here I am referring to a Washington Post story entitled “Biden says Justice Department should prosecute those who refuse Jan. 6 committee’s subpoenas” by Amy B. Wang on 16 October 2021, where we have the autocrat Joe Biden proving he is an autocrat by acting like an autocrat, to wit:

President Biden said Friday that the Justice Department should prosecute those who defy subpoenas from the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection, the most he has weighed in on possible consequences for aides of former president Donald Trump who have refused to comply with the panel’s demands.

“I hope the committee goes after them and holds them accountable,” Biden told reporters Friday evening, when asked what should happen to those who defy subpoenas from the congressional committee.

end quotes

And you know what, people – I hope the WITCH HUNTERS do go after them with both guns drawn and blazing, because that will strip the WITCH HUNTERS and the autocrat Biden of control, because as soon as these people are charged, it become a matter for the courts, and DUE PROCESS OF LAW then must be afforded to these people, as we see in United States Supreme Court case of John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, to wit:

Nor is the Congress a law enforcement or trial agency.

These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government.

No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of the Congress.

Investigations conducted solely for the personal aggrandizement of the investigators or to ‘punish’ those investigated are indefensible.

It is unquestionably the duty of all citizens to cooperate with the Congress in its efforts to obtain the facts needed for intelligent legislative action.

It is their unremitting obligation to respond to subpoenas, to respect the dignity of the Congress and its committees and to testify fully with respect to matters within the province of proper investigation.

This, of course, assumes that the constitutional rights of witnesses will be respected by the Congress as they are in a court of justice.

The Bill of Rights is applicable to investigations as to all forms of governmental action.

Witnesses cannot be compelled to give evidence against themselves.

They cannot be subjected to unreasonable search and seizure.

Nor can the First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, religion, or political belief and association be abridged.

end quotes

And here we have to go back to the authorizing resolution for the WITCH HUNTERS, which is fatally flawed, to wit:

H.Res.503 – Establishing the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.

117th Congress (2021-2022)

Sponsor: Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-12] (Introduced 06/28/2021)

In the House of Representatives, U. S., June 30, 2021.

Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted in multiple deaths, physical harm to over 140 members of law enforcement, and terror and trauma among staff, institutional employees, press, and Members;

end quotes

WAS THERE AN INSURRECTION ON 6 JANUARY 2021?

And if not, then how can the WITCH HUNTERS compel anyone under threat of being jailed to come in and give testimony about something that never happened?

But let’s leave that for the moment and go back to Joe Biden the autocrat being an autocrat, to wit:

When asked Friday if the Justice Department should prosecute those who refuse the committee’s subpoenas, Biden responded, “I do.”

“Yes.”

end quotes

And this following statement is just wondrous to behold, to wit:

Shortly after Biden’s remarks, the Justice Department tried to distance itself from any implications the White House was influencing decisions there.

“The Department of Justice will make its own independent decisions in all prosecutions based solely on the facts and the law.”

“Period.”

“Full stop,” Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley said in a statement Friday.

end quotes

You go, dude!

And then we had Jen coming on the scene, as well, to wit:

White House press secretary Jen Psaki, too, later sought to clarify Biden’s comments and emphasize the separation between the branches of government.

“As [Biden] has said many times, January 6th was one of the darkest days in our democracy,” Psaki tweeted Friday night.

“He supports the work of the committee and the independent role of the Department of Justice to make any decisions about prosecutions.”

end quotes

Ah, okay, Jen!

And now, we take a break for station identification and a word from our sponsors!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-447344
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 18, 2021 AT 9:04 PM

Paul Plante says:

And while we are on the subject of the fatally flawed authorizing resolution of Democrat Nancy Pelosi forming her “selected” committee of WITCH HUNTERS to create a false narrative, a “BIG LIE,” about what they say happened on 6 January 2021 in order to influence the 2022 Congressional elections in their favor, on the question of due process of law, let’s go to this following judicial language from the United States Supreme Court in the case of John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, to wit:

Since World War II, the Congress has practically abandoned its original practice of utilizing the coercive sanction of contempt proceedings at the bar of the House.

The sanction there imposed is imprisonment by the House until the recalcitrant witness agrees to testify or disclose the matters sought, provided that the incarceration does not extend beyond adjournment.

The Congress has instead invoked the aid of the federal judicial system in protecting itself against contumacious conduct.

It has become customary to refer these matters to the United States Attorneys for prosecution under criminal law.

end quotes

Now, note that language about “refer these matters to the United States Attorneys for prosecution under criminal law.”

When I say, and this is speaking as an American citizen who believes in and supports RULE OF LAW as opposed to RULE OF NANCY or RULE OF JOE, that I hope the WITCH HUNTERS do go after their intended victims with both guns drawn and blazing, because that will strip the WITCH HUNTERS and the autocrat Biden of control, because as soon as these people are charged, it become a matter for the courts, and DUE PROCESS OF LAW then must be afforded to these people, it is that very phrase I am referring to.

When somebody, anybody, is prosecuted pursuant to criminal law, which is what was at issue in John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, they are entitled to appeal their conviction, as Watkins did, all the way up to the Supreme Court, a process Nancy Pelosi, her WITCH HUNTERS and Joe Biden have absolutely no control over, nor should they, which takes us back to that case, as follows:

The appropriate statute is found in 2 U.S.C. § 192, 2 U.S.C.A. § 192.

It provides: ‘Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House, or any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or any committee of either House of Congress, willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $100 and imprisonment in a common jail for not less than one month nor more than twelve months.’

end quotes

That is the criminal statute that the Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS are planning to employ against Bannon, and as I say, I hope they do, which takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, to wit:

In fulfillment of their obligation under this statute, the courts must accord to the defendants every right which is guaranteed to defendants in all other criminal cases.

end quotes

BINGO, people – there is where Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and the WITCH HUNTERS lose their control over the narrative they need to create out of whole cloth in order to influence the American people away from the Republicans so the Democrats can further cement their iron grip on our national government as they seek to impose ONE PARTY RULE over us, a FREE PEOPLE who don’t make good Democrat serfs and slaves, at all, which takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, as follows:

Among these is the right to have available, through a sufficiently precise statute, information revealing the standard of criminality before the commission of the alleged offense.

Applied to persons prosecuted under § 192, this raises a special problem in that the statute defines the crime as refusal to answer ‘any question pertinent to the question under inquiry.’

Part of the standard of criminality, therefore, is the pertinency of the questions propounded to the witness.

end quotes

Which takes us back to the Authorizing Resolution, after Nancy stated in her own words, “Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election,” as follows:

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.

There is hereby established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (hereinafter referred to as the “Select Committee”).

end quotes

Ask yourselves, people, this one question: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI KNOW THOSE PEOPLE WERE INSURRECTIONISTS, WHICH IS TO SAY, CRIMINALS, SINCE INSURRECTION IS A SERIOUS FEDERAL CRIME?

AND HOW WOULD STEVE BANNON, OR ANYBODY ELSE, KNOW THOSE PEOPLE WERE INSURRECTIONISTS?

And then ask yourself this one: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI KNOW WHAT ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE FOR THAT DAY?

CAN NANCY PELOSI READ MINDS?

CAN STEVE BANNON READ MINDS?

If not, then how is he, or anybody else, going to tell the WITCH HUNTERS what any of those people were doing there, keeping in mind that one Democrat was arrested wearing a MAGA HAT and posing as a Trump supporter?

And that takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, to wit:

It is obvious that a person compelled to make this choice (to appear or not appear, or answer or not answer) is entitled to have knowledge of the subject to which the interrogation is deemed pertinent.

That knowledge must be available with the same degree of explicitness and clarity that the Due Process Clause requires in the expression of any element of a criminal offense.

end quotes

And there we are back to why this whole Pelosi-ite FARCE is just plain stupid, and why the WITCH HUNTERS along with Nancy Pelosi and the AUTOCRAT Joe Biden are going to lose control of the narrative and the process itself, the moment they refer Bannon for criminal prosecution under 2 U.S.C. § 192.

Getting back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, we have:

The ‘vice of vagueness’ must be avoided here as in all other crimes.

There are several sources that can outline the ‘question under inquiry’ in such a way that the rules against vagueness are satisfied.

The authorizing resolution, the remarks of the chairman or members of the committee, or even the nature of the proceedings themselves, might sometimes make the topic clear.

end quotes

And ask yourselves again, does this authorizing resolution of Nancy Pelosi’s make anything clear, other than the WITCH HUNTERS are to create a narrative for Nancy that will be a BIG LIE with which to influence the 2022 congressional elections?

Which question takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, to wit:

This case demonstrates, however, that these sources often leave the matter in grave doubt.

end quotes

Amen!

And let the games begin!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-447998
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 20, 2021 AT 10:50 AM

Paul Plante says:

Axis Sally, Tokyo Rose and Jen Psaki!

What do they all have in common?

Mildred Elizabeth Gillars (November 29, 1900 – June 25, 1988), nicknamed “Axis Sally” along with Rita Zucca, was an American broadcaster employed by Nazi Germany to disseminate Axis propaganda during World War II.

Tokyo Rose was a name given by Allied troops in the South Pacific during World War II to all female English-speaking radio broadcasters of Japanese propaganda.

And Biden-ista Jen Psaki follows in their footsteps by disseminating CULT OF JOE propaganda here in the United States as she did just yesterday ( https://theglobalherald.com/news/trumps ... jen-psaki/ ) with her very ridiculous and absurd statement that Donald Trump posed a ‘unique and existential threat to our democracy,’ a statement so bizarre as to be totally unbelievable and which has American citizens who are not Biden or Psaki KOOL-AID DRINKERS now comparing Jen, America’s favorite bobble-head, to Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, known as “Baghdad Bob,” Saddam’s Minister of Information as the bobble-head Jen is Joe Biden’s MINISTER OF INFORMATION, who in March of 2003, like Jen today, was everybody’s favorite inadvertent comedian.

Sporting a kicky black beret and delightfully bombastic lexicon, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf appeared on TV daily to predict American failure and deny the Baghdad invasion — sometimes even as U.S. tanks appeared behind him.

“He’s great,” President George W. Bush said of Sahaf, admitting that he occasionally interrupted meetings to watch Sahaf’s briefings.

“Someone accused us of hiring him and putting him there.”

“He was a classic.”

And people, today, our very own Jen is also a classic with her line in response to Peter Doocy, the White House correspondent for Fox News, that “Well, since you give me the opportunity here, former President Trump used his office to incite an insurrection,” which idiotic statement is Bizarre Beyond Belief (BBB), given a Washington Examiner story sixty-one (61) days earlier, a story Jen apparently missed or disregarded since it did not agree with the BIDEN-ESQUE PROPAGANDA she is spewing, entitled “FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6” by Conn Carroll on 8/20/2021, where we had another completely different version of reality than the mythical horse**** Jen is spewing, to wit:

The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence”

By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, according to the FBI. Reuters reports:

The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

“Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation.

“Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized.”

“But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”

This report is a devastating blow to President Joe Biden and Democrats, who have attempted to make the existence of an “insurrection” on Jan. 6 a key issue in the 2022 midterm elections.

Reuters does note that some “cells of protesters,” including members of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, did coordinate to “break into the Capitol,” but the FBI found “no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside.”

The FBI has arrested 570 rioters and each and every one of them should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

But that is what the event was: a riot, just like so many other riots.

Trying to politicize it and turn it into something it wasn’t won’t make the Capitol any safer.

end quotes

But people, disregard that, because what Jen says is THE TRUTH, while everybody knows the FBI lies, which takes us back to “Baghdad Bob” who became the subject of T-shirts, mugs, adoring websites, a pop song, and an action figure.

Will our very own Jen achieve the greatness of a “Baghdad Bob” and herself became the subject of T-shirts, mugs, adoring websites, a pop song, and an action figure?

Will we see bobble-head dolls of Jen riding on the dashboards of American cars all over the nation right up there next to the Plastic Jesus?

I don’t care if it rains or freezes
Long as I got my plastic Jen
Riding on the dashboard of my car.

Through my trials and tribulations
And my travels through the nations
With my plastic Jen I’ll go far.
Plastic Jen plastic Jen,
Riding on the dashboard of my car

Plastic Jen doesn’t hear
‘Cause she has a plastic ear
Plastic Jen plastic Jen,
Riding on the dashboard of my car!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-448957
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 39961
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: ON THE POLITICAL OVERTHROW OF DONALD J. TRUMP

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 22, 2021 AT 5:16 PM

Paul Plante says:

And while we are on the subject of history being made here in the United States of America, not a Zinn-ist emotionalist version of it, but true contemporary history that can be and is very well documented with regard to what was taking place INSIDE the Capitol on 6 January 2021, which is really what is of importance and historical significance here in the same way the Webster-Haynes debates in the 1800’s were of historical significance in terms of what was to come thereafter, and I am talking about the debates, not some hysterical blathering from people like AOC, where would we go to find out what was really taking place INSIDE the Capitol that day during the Joint Session to certify Joe Biden as the next president, just as Nancy Pelosi guaranteed Democrats on 3 January 2021 was going to happen?

Is there any source we, the American people can really trust to find out that information?

And the answer is OF COURSE, because while the DEMOCRATS might control much of what is printed as “news,” DEMOCRAT propaganda in actuality, they don’t control all of it, and here, I am making direct reference to the Congressional Record – United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167, WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 No. 4, where we had the highly inflammatory “prayer” that Nancy Pelosi had read that day as her way of starting a session she had already predicted, as if possessed of inside information as to what was about to happen outside, which is very reminiscent of the circumstances surrounding the Reichstag Fire in Germany on February 27, 1933, and this is important because we have a shrill and hysterical Liz Cheney and other vocal WITCH HUNTERS going on about Bannon intending to disrupt “CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS,” when the reality revealed by a search of the record demonstrates that Nancy Pelosi never intended to follow CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS in the first place, which is the true cause of the riot on 6 January 2021, not anything Bannon might have said, and that Nancy Pelosi was intending the joint session to be disruptive starts with a review of the incendiary language of the so-called prayer she had read to start the session, which was a blatant power grab by Nancy Pelosi too reminiscent of Adolph Hitler’s power grab in Germany on the heels of the Reichstag Fire, believed set by the Nazis themselves, but blamed on the Communists, nonetheless, because the Nazis need a trigger that would allow them to literally get rid of their political opposition by killing them or incarcerating them in concentration camps, to wit:

PRAYER

The Chaplain, Reverend Margaret Grun Kibben, offered the following prayer:

O God, our refuge and our strength, a very present help in times of discord and trouble.

Mountains crumble, waters rage, nations roar, and yet we need not be afraid, for even now You abide with us in these times of great discord, uncertainty, and unrest.

We, who have pledged to defend our Constitution against all enemies, we pray Your hedge of protection around this Nation.

Defend us from those adversaries, both foreign and domestic, outside these walls and perhaps within these Chambers, who sow seeds of acrimony to divide colleagues and conspire to undermine trust in Your divine authority over all things.

end quotes

And let us stop right there to examine those words just uttered there by Nancy Pelosi’s personal Chaplain as a prayer or invocation to the GOD of the Democrats to apparently smite the heathen Republicans and give them some what-for up alongside the head, to wit:

“Defend us (the Democrats) from those adversaries (Trump and the Republicans) outside these walls and perhaps within these Chambers, who sow seeds of acrimony to divide colleagues and conspire to undermine trust in Your divine authority over all things.”

BIZARRE BEYOND BELIEF, people, that statement right there, which strongly implies if does not come out and state that GOD is on the side of Joe Biden in his epic fight to save the soul of America from Donald Trump and the forces of evil, like this is a re-run of Lord of the Rings, and Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats and it should scare the hell out of anybody in America who is not a Democrat and does not want to be a Democrat, nor a Democrat slave, which takes us back to that same sentence further shortened, to wit:

“Defend us (the Democrats) from those adversaries (Trump and the Republicans) who conspire to undermine trust in Your divine authority over all things.”

end quotes

Are we becoming a theocracy, people, where a “theocracy” is a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god?

As to this personal Chaplain of Nancy Pelosi’s who made that statement, which seems very much intended to be fighting words to me, let’s us go to a Pelosi Press Release from December 31, 2020 entitled “Pelosi Appoints Rear Admiral Margaret Grun Kibben First Woman to Serve as Chaplain of the U.S. House of Representatives,” where we had as follows from Nancy, to wit:

Washington, D.C. – Speaker Nancy Pelosi today announced her appointment of Rear Admiral Margaret Grun Kibben as House Chaplain, following the House retirement of Father Pat Conroy.

Kibben will be the first woman to serve as Chaplain in either chamber of Congress.

“It is my honor to announce the appointment of Rear Admiral Margaret Grun Kibben to serve as Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives: the first woman to serve in this historic position, which has been enshrined in our Democracy since the First Congress in 1789,” said Speaker Pelosi.

“Kibben brings decades of decorated experience in the military and the ministry, as a retired Rear Admiral who served as the U.S. Navy’s Chief Chaplain and the chaplain of the Marine Corps.”

“Her integrity, experience and patriotism will serve the Congress and the Country well, as she ministers to the needs of Members.”

end quotes

And the “Members” whose needs she was ministering to on 6 January 2021 with that inflammatory speech intended to serve as a provocation or incitement to violence were obviously those of Nancy Pelosi and her Democrats, which takes us back to the fighting words of Nancy’s personal Chaplain on 6 January 2021, to wit:

The journey of this experiment in democracy is perilous and demanding, fraught with anger and discontent.

end quotes

Oh, yeah?

Who says?

I don’t believe that for a minute, myself and it sounds like some partisan political horsecrap she made up along with Nancy Pelosi to meet the needs of the Democrats on that historical day as she did her best to inflame tempers on that day and so stoke the violence which was to come as a direct response to the provocation, which takes us back to her political speech posing in the guise of a prayer, to wit:

But wise rulers still seek You.

So help us, God, to find You in the midst of us.

So help us, God, to see Your gracious plan even in the events of these days.

So help us, God, to serve You and this Nation with Godliness and dignity.

We lay before You the gifts of our hopes, our dreams, our deliberations, and our debates, that You would be revealed and exalted among the people.

We pray these things in the strength of Your holy name.

Amen.

end quotes

We lay before You the gifts of our hopes, our dreams, our deliberations, and our debates, that You would be revealed and exalted among the people?

HUH?

January 6, 2021 was really about God revealing himself or herself to the American people in order to be exalted among the American people.

Stupid me, I guess, because I thought they were there that day to certify Joe Biden as Nancy Pelosi’s choice for the next president of the United States of America.

I wonder how I missed the fact that it was really about GOD being revealed that day which means the insurrection on 6 January 2021 had nothing at all to do with whether or not Joe Biden got elected to anything, and everything to do with Trump and Steve Bannon trying to keep GOD from being revealed that day, because they wanted Trump to be exalted by the American people, instead.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-450454
Post Reply