SONIA SOTOMAYOR SHOULD BE IMPEACHED

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74079
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: SONIA SOTOMAYOR SHOULD BE IMPEACHED

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR October 1, 2019 at 7:00 pm

Paul Plante says :

As to the “SONIA SOTOMAYOR SLIGHT,” which indeed is very relevant to this discussion where science by fiat is being inflicted on us, it starts right here, to wit:

“DEVELOPERS SEE A ZEALOT IN NEW COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER”

By Laurie Anderson, Albany, New York Times Union

10 JANUARY 1988

Some developers have complained that Plante’s attention to detail has gotten out of control.

Plante is the focus of a political controversy fueled by the Democratic majority in the county legislature, including chairman Joseph Manupella, who said he’s concerned many developers may not be getting a fair shake and may start looking outside the county.

Plante contended that, unlike some of his predecessors, he knows the regulations well and will not bend the state health laws.

He contended some developers are upset because they are no longer “free and loose” to do what they want in Rensselaer County.

“There was a game that was played out here too long,” he said, adding too many county residents already have problems with cracked foundations, raw sewage runoff and tainted water.

Plante is involved in several fierce feuds with developers, the most public of which involves Anderson, who is attempting to rally the county legislature, Buono, and the state Health Department to make Plante more compliant.

end quotes

Read the word “compliant” to mean they wanted a whore who would take bribes and look the other way, and to not question the bogus science they were basing their development plans on.

When it became clear that I wasn’t going to be a whore, I was crushed instead, and when I appealed to the courts for relief, Sonia Sotomayor told me to my face to “**** off, A-HOLE,” which is what tokenny refers to as a “slight.”

Thanks to Sonia Sotomayor, we now are buried in FRAUD that passes for science.

tokenny is cool with that; I’m not.

That is why I think Sotomayor should be impeached and removed from the bench because a federal judge who upholds fraud and corruption is worthless to a free people.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/t ... ent-183113
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74079
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: SONIA SOTOMAYOR SHOULD BE IMPEACHED

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR January 18, 2020 at 9:22 pm

Paul Plante says :

Third, the panel held that plaintiffs’ claimed injuries were not redressable by an Article III court.

Specifically, the panel held that it was beyond the power of an Article III court to order, design, supervise, or implement the plaintiffs’ requested remedial plan where any effective plan would necessarily require a host of complex policy decisions entrusted to the wisdom and discretion of the executive and legislative branches.

The panel reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs’ case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large.

end quotes

Those words are from the majority Decision of the United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit in the matter of Juliana at al. v. United States et al., filed January 17, 2020, effectively, for the moment, anyway, shutting down that insane idea that has been drilled into the heads of these gullible children being exploited by these lawyers that a federal judge actually has the power to not only control the earth’s many micro-climates, itself an absurd idea, but further, to grant them as individuals the climate they want, when and where they want it, which is even more absurd.

But as we can see from the VOX article entitled “21 kids sued the government over climate change. A federal court dismissed the case. Plaintiffs in the Juliana v. US lawsuit alleged the government violated the rights of young people to a safe climate” by Umair Irfan on Jan. 17, 2020, the insanity is far from over, to wit:

Andrea Rodgers, a senior attorney at Our Children’s Trust, the nonprofit backing the youth who filed the lawsuit, described the decision in an email as “unprecedented and contrary to American principles of justice.”

Her organization has vowed to appeal the ruling in the coming weeks.

end quotes

Which itself is an incredibly stupid or naïve statement, given that the “American principles of justice” do not guarantee to children the climate they want, when they want it, nor do American principles of justice have any control whatsoever over the microclimates of the earth, which aren’t stable and never really have been.

As the climate expert H.H. Lamb stated in the seminal Climate, History and the Modern World, 2d. edition:

Most generations of mankind in most parts of the world have regarded climate as an unreliable, shifting, fluctuating thing, sometimes offering briefly unforeseen opportunities but at other times bringing disaster by famine, flood, drought or disease — not to mention frost, snow and icy winds.

end quotes

But today, we have these lawyers convincing children that now, it really doesn’t have to be that way, and the reason it was that way was because of all the carbon dioxide emitted by the United States of America since 1751.

Today, according to the crap these lawyers are jamming into the heads of these gullible children, the federal judges in America have the power to not only make the earth and its climate come to heel on command, but further, to make it lie down and do tricks, as well.

What horse****, but then, we are dealing with lawyers here, and that is their product they have for sale to the unsuspecting and gullible in the world.

As to what “climate” actually is, Lamb defines it thusly:

By climate we mean the total experience of the weather at any place over some specific period of time.

end quotes

That is what climate is and that is all that climate is, so when we hear of federal judges controlling the climate for these children, they are actually going to take control of the total experience of weather at any place over some specific period of time, that being at least the lifetime of these children, and who, besides The Guardian and these lawyers believes that?

And then in that same VOX article, we have this:

However, District Court Judge Josephine Staton thought otherwise and did not mince words in her dissent.

“It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses,” she wrote.

“Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the Nation.”

end quotes

And speaking of irony, that statement about the government not only bluntly insisting, but actually having the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the Nation brings us back in time to the Cape Charles Mirror thread “Op-Ed: Should Sonia Sotomayor resign in disgrace?” http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... -disgrace/ where we find clearly stated the source of the absolute and unreviewable power of the government to destroy the Nation – it comes from federal judges like Sonia Sotomayor who are put in office by politicians like Hussein Obama to protect that corrupt power by crushing citizens like myself who would dare to challenge it with facts, not hysteria as was the case here.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/c ... ent-220077
Post Reply