TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post Reply
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

REUTERS

"U.S. job growth picks up, desperate employers boost wages to attract workers"

Lucia Mutikani

June 4, 2021

This bodes well for consumer spending, which could also get a powerful tailwind from the more than $2.3 trillion in excess savings amassed during the pandemic.

REUTERS

"U.S. retail sales take step back as spending pivots to services, trend remains strong"

Lucia Mutikani

June 15, 2021

Even with the boost from stimulus checks fading, consumption could get a powerful tailwind from the at least $2.3 trillion in excess savings amassed by households during the pandemic.

REUTERS

"U.S. retail sales surprise to upside in strong boost to economy"

By Lucia Mutikani

September 16, 2021

Americans are sitting on at least $2.5 trillion in excess savings accumulated during the pandemic.

What is Jerome Powell's net worth?

Powell is one of the wealthiest Federal Reserve chairs in history.

His net worth is currently estimated to be between $17 and $55 million, according to financial disclosure documents at the time of his nomination as chair in 2019.

CNBC

"Powell orders ethics review after Fed presidents disclosed multimillion-dollar investments"

Thomas Franck @TOMWFRANCK

PUBLISHED THU, SEP 16 2021

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell directed staff to review the central bank’s ethics rules for appropriate financial activities after disclosures that several senior central bank officials made multiple multimillion-dollar stock trades in 2020, while others held significant investments.

Last week, financial disclosures filed by the Fed’s 12 regional presidents revealed some had actively traded in 2020, while others held million-dollar financial positions without making changes to their portfolios.

Powell ordered the review “because the trust of the American people is essential for the Federal Reserve to effectively carry out our important mission,” the spokesman said.

Documents released last week revealed that Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan made multiple trades worth $1 million or more last year in individual stocks including Apple, Amazon and Delta Air Lines.

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren held stakes in four real estate investment trusts and several purchases and sales of similar property-owning vehicles, according to filings.

He also held stock in Pfizer, Chevron and AT&T.

Even the appearance of self-dealing at the Fed could prove problematic to an institution tasked with the impartial oversight of U.S. employment and inflation.

The trades quickly came under scrutiny given the Fed’s critical role in managing the U.S. economy as well as its influence over interest rates and liquidity markets.

The Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing recession magnified the Fed’s power in 2020.

Congress allows the Fed, with the Treasury Department’s approval, to embark on a wide range of emergency lending measures to flush the economy with cash during times of crisis.

Separately, Warren sent letters to all of the Fed’s regional bank presidents demanding tighter restrictions on the type of financial activity officials can engage in.

“As the Fed took extraordinary actions to address the risks to the economy and the banking and financial systems from the COVID-19 pandemic, you and your colleague Eric Rosengren made extensive trades in individual stocks and real estate investment trusts,” Warren wrote in her letter to Kaplan.

That trading, she added, “has prompted concerns about conflicts of interest among high-level officials with far-reaching policymaking influence and extraordinary access to information about the economy.”


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/16/fed-chi ... rades.html
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR JUNE 1, 2021 AT 6:11 PM

And going back to the transcript from Joe Biden’s address to a joint session of Congress on 28 April 2021, we have Joe speaking to not only America and the world, but the universe, as well, and saying thusly, to wit:

Madame Speaker.

Madame Vice President.

The First Lady.

The Second Gentleman.

My fellow Americans,

While the setting tonight is familiar, this gathering is very different – a reminder of the extraordinary times we are in.

As I stand here tonight — just one day shy of the 100th day of my administration.

100 days since I took the oath of office, lifted my hand off our family Bible, and inherited a nation in crisis.

The worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

end quotes

And my goodness, people, of course it would have to be the worst one, because if it wasn’t, think how much less majestic and heroic Joe would seem, not to mention not having an excuse to loot several TRILLION dollars from the U.S. treasury with which to reward his followers.

So, how did those in Joe’s inner circle fare during this GREAT HUGE RECESSION?

Like the common person in America, did they too see their fortunes depleted?

Or was the GREAT HUGE RECESSION actually good to them?

For a look at what that answer might be, let’s go to an ABC News story entitled “Obama-era officials return to White House worth millions – White House financial disclosures show several officials gained massive wealth” by Soo Rin Kim and Libby Cathey on March 21, 2021, where we learn as follows about the inner circle of THE CULT OF JOE, to wit:

As several Obama-era officials return to the White House under President Joe Biden, their reunion comes with fuller pockets and deeper ties to corporate interests, new financial disclosure reports show.

According to ABC News’ analysis of the most recent disclosure reports, many of Biden’s top White House officials, including Chief of Staff Ron Klain, Domestic Policy Council Director Susan Rice, National Economic Council Director Brian Deese, and coronavirus response coordinator Jeff Zients, have substantially multiplied their wealth over the past few years.

end quotes

And seriously, people, in a world finally gone right for a change, isn’t that the way it really should be, that those in the top echelons of government over us should not be poor like us, but should instead be flush with cash?

How else, afterall, could we respect them if they weren’t special?

Getting back to the story, it goes on as follows:

Rice, who is among the wealthiest members of the Biden White House team, dramatically increased her wealth since her previous White House job during the Obama administration, reporting between $36 million and $149 million in various assets in her new disclosure filing released Saturday morning.

That’s nearly three to four times the amount she reported back in 2009, when she joined the Obama administration as the ambassador to the United Nations.

Back then she reported total wealth between $13.6 million and $40.4 million, and the figure didn’t increase dramatically when she served as President Barack Obama’s national security advisor during his second term.

In her most recent filing, Rice reported holding shares worth between $250,000 and $5 million in major corporations including Johnson & Johnson, Apple and Microsoft.

She also had a significant amount of stock options in Netflix, where she served as a board member, and reported earning more than $300,000 from exercising Netflix stock options in the past year.

In addition, she reported shares in several oil and gas industry companies, including $1 million to $5 million of holdings in the Canadian multinational natural gas distribution company Enbridge Inc.

Rice, who served as the president of her author and speaking business SERice LLC, earned roughly $620,000 from various corporate and academic speaking engagements in the past year, and $250,000 from book royalties, with her total income from the past year amounting to between $2 million and $6.7 million.

ABC News has not yet obtained Rice’s ethics agreement, so it’s not yet clear if she has or will divest from her assets in private companies or recuse herself from matters related to those companies — except for her stock options in Netflix, which she said in her disclosure report that she’ll be divesting.

end quotes

So the GREAT HUGE RECESSION that wiped the fortunes of a lot of common ordinary people was actually pretty kind to Susan Rice, which takes us back to the story as follows:

“These White House officials are experienced government leaders whose past private sector experience is part of a broad and diverse skill set they bring to government service,” a White House spokesperson told ABC News in a statement.

“They have returned to government because of their deep commitment to public service, their desire to help bring our nation out of this time of crisis, and their strong belief that government can work for the American people.”

end quotes

And isn’t that enough to have us all weeping with joy, people, and feeling good about ourselves and all warm and squishy inside, the thought that these really rich people have such love and devotion for us that they would come back and serve us as our public servants because they have such a strong belief that government can actually work for the American people, instead of for their pockets?

Let’s go back to the story and see who else in the Biden administration the GREAT HUGE RECESSION has blessed, to wit:

Klain, a longtime adviser to Biden, has also tripled his wealth since 2009, a comparison of his past and new disclosures shows.

When he joined the Obama administration in 2009 as Biden’s chief of staff, Klain reported owning between $1.4 million and $3.5 million in assets, and he now enters the Biden administration with between $4.4 million and $12.2 million in various assets.

Much of Klain’s wealth comes from various assets related to his employment.

In 2020 he received nearly $2 million in salary from the venture capital firm Revolution LLC, where he was executive vice president and general counsel, compared to $1 million he reported receiving in salary in his filing from early 2009.

end quotes

Joe figures that if you really want some very smart people to help Joe help out the poor folks in this troubled and sick nation, it is best to get some really well-off people with a lot of money because it is they who know what is best for the poor folks to help them along, so to speak, which brings us back to the story, as follows:

Zients is the single wealthiest Biden administration official that had disclosed assets as of Saturday evening, surpassing Vanita Gupta, Biden’s nominee for associate attorney general, in his total assets.

Zients reported owning between $89.3 million and $442.8 million in assets, including various investment funds, real estate properties and cash shares.

He has divested his shares in his private investment firm, Cranemere Group, as well as $1 million worth of shares in Facebook, where he has served as a board member.

He reported making between $10.4 million and $28 million in income in the past year, including his seven-figure salary from his investment firm, as well as other several seven-figure assets he has divested from.

His total wealth has more than doubled since he first joined the Obama White House as the deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget in 2009, when he reported assets between $45.2 million and $205.7 million.

end quotes

Aren’t we truly blessed, people, to have such people as these helping Joe Biden to help us all and get us back on our feet?

And my goodness, who else among the Biden-ista inner circle has been blessed with good fortune by the GREAT HUGE RECESSION?

How about everybody’s most favorite white house mouthpiece:

In her disclosure report, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki reported receiving a communications consulting fee from Zients in excess of $5,000 — though the report has no further details on the transaction.

Her assets have also grown significantly since her first White House job during the Obama administration.

In 2009, Psaki had reported between $32,000 and $130,000 in assets and $125,000 in income, but in 2021 she reported her wealth had increased at least tenfold, to up to $1.5 million in assets with an annual income of roughly $647,742.

Much of her income from the past year came from Evergreen Consulting LLC, which she founded, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace think tank.

She also worked as a CNN contributor and an adviser to WestExec, a consulting firm founded in 2017 by current Secretary of State Antony Blinken, at which several Obama-era officials worked.

In addition to the $5,000 Zients paid her, she was paid the same consulting fee by Lyft, among a handful of other companies.

end quotes

And really, people, is there anyone more deserving of that good fortune than Jen Psaki, because without her dedication to us, we would have no clue whatsoever as to what was actually going on in Washington, which again takes us back to the story of the members of the inner circle of the CULT OF JOE, to wit:

Deese’s wealth has also multiplied dramatically since 2009, when he took his first White House job as Obama’s special assistant for economic policy.

In 2015, just a few months into his role as deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, Deese reported owning between $81,000 and $215,000 in assets — but now, as a member of the Biden administration, he’s reported between $2 million and $7.2 million in assets.

Prior to joining the Biden administration, Deese made $2.3 million in salary from the investment firm BlackRock as the Global Head of Sustainable Investing, compared to the $175,000 in salary he received during his last year as Obama’s deputy OMB director.

Jen O’Malley Dillon, the White House deputy chief of staff, was paid consulting fees by General Electric, Lyft, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and Gates Ventures, among others, as clients of Precision Strategies, a marketing agency in which she was a founding partner.

She reported between $2.2 million to $4.7 million in assets on her disclosure form and more than $800,000 in income in the past year, which includes $426,067 deferred compensation and severance from Precision Strategies, on top of $50,000 in salary from the firm.

She also made more than $110,000 as Beto O’Rourke’s campaign manager before becoming Biden’s campaign manager at a salary of over $190,000.

Jake Sullivan, Biden’s current national security adviser, is another multimillionaire, reporting assets between $7.5 million and $27.5 million held with his spouse, Margaret Goodlander, a former law clerk to now-Attorney General Judge Merrick Garland.

Much of his wealth comes from a long list of residential and commercial real estate properties scattered throughout Florida and New Hampshire, and he also reported holding five- to six-figure dollars’ worth of shares in private companies including Abbott Labs, American Express, Facebook, FedEx, Google, Merck, Visa and Verizon.

Sullivan’s salary from the consulting firm Macro Advisory Partners in the past year was $138,000, and his corporate consulting clients included Uber, LEGO, MasterCard and Standard Chartered Bank.

He also held academic positions at Yale and Dartmouth.

In first lady Jill Biden’s office, chief of staff Julissa Reynoso was a partner at the law firm of Winston & Strawn, where she made more than $1.5 million last year with a $150,000 bonus.

She reported between $4.1 million and $14.8 million in assets, and made up to $1.9 million in total income in the past year, including income from rental properties in New York and Miami as well as commercial properties in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and Henderson, North Carolina, among others.

She also listed a vacant beachfront property in the Dominican Republic on her disclosure form.

end quotes

And there we have it, people, fortune shines down on the fortunate, does it not?


http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-359615
BRIEFING ROOM

Remarks by President Biden on the Economy


SEPTEMBER 16, 2021

East Room

2:00 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Good afternoon. 

I want to start by thanking the House committees for working hard this week to advance critical components of the economic plan that I’ve put before the Congress.

I know we still have a long way to go, but I’m confident that Congress will deliver to my desk both the bipartisan physical infrastructure plan and the Build Back Better plan that I have proposed.

And I’ve said many times before: I believe we’re at an inflection point in this country — one of those moments where the decisions we’re about to make can change — literally change the trajectory of our nation for years and possibly decades to come.

Each inflection point in this nation’s history represents a fundamental choice.


I believe that America, at this moment, is facing such a choice. 

And the choice is this: Are we going to continue with an economy where the overwhelming share of the benefits go to big corporations and the very wealthy? 

Or are we going to take this moment right now to set this country on a new path — one that invests in this nation; creates real, sustained economic growth; and that benefits everyone, including working people and middle-class folks?


That’s something we haven’t realized in this country for decades.

The data — (clears throat) — excuse me. 

The data is absolutely clear. 

Over the past 40 years, the wealthy have gotten wealthier, and too many corporations have lost their sense of responsibility to their workers, their communities, and the country.

Just look at the facts. 

CEOs used to make about 20 times the average worker in the company that they ran. 

Today, they make more than 350 times what the average worker in their corporation makes.

Since the pandemic began, billionaires have seen their wealth go up by $1.8 trillion. 

That is, everyone who was a billionaire before the pandemic began, the total accumulated wealth beyond the billions they already had has gone up by $1.8 trillion.


Simply not fair.

And it’s — how is it possible that 55 of the largest corporations in this country paid zero dollars in federal income taxes? 

They made over $40 billion in the year 2020, and they’ve paid zero. 

Think about that. 

Zero dollars in federal taxes on $40 billion in profits.

How is it possible that the wealthiest billionaires in the country can entirely escape paying income tax on what they’ve made?

How is it possible for millionaires and billionaires that can pay a lower rate of tax than teachers, firefighters, or law enforcement officers?

TO BE CONTINUED ...
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

CNBC

"Fed Chief Powell, other officials owned securities central bank bought during Covid pandemic"

Steve Liesman @STEVELIESMAN

PUBLISHED FRI, SEP 17 2021

Amid an outcry about Federal Reserve officials owning and trading individual securities, an in-depth look by CNBC at officials’ financial disclosures found three who last year held assets of the same type the Fed itself was buying, including Chairman Jerome Powell.

None of these holdings or transactions appeared to violate the Fed’s code of conduct.

But they raise further questions about the Fed’s conflict of interest policies and the oversight of central bank officials.

Powell held between $1.25 million and $2.5 million of municipal bonds in family trusts over which he is said to have no control.

They were just a small portion of his total reported assets.

While the bonds were purchased before 2019, they were held while the Fed last year bought more than $5 billion in munis, including one from the state of Illinois purchased by his family trust in 2016.

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren held between $151,000 and $800,000 worth of real estate investment trusts that owned mortgage-backed securities.

He made as many as 37 separate trades in the four REITS while the Fed purchased almost $700 billion in MBS.

Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin held $1.35 million to $3 million in individual corporate bonds purchased before 2020.

They include bonds of Pepsi, Home Depot and Eli Lilly.

The Fed last year opened a corporate bond-buying facility and purchased $46.5 billion of corporate bonds.

Among those questions: Should the Fed have banned officials from holding, buying and selling the same assets the Fed itself was buying last year when it dramatically widened the types of assets it would purchase in response to the pandemic?

A Fed ethics officer determined that the holdings did not violate government rules.

But Dennis Kelleher, CEO of the nonprofit Better Markets, said if some of these Fed actions are not against the rules, the rules need to change.

“To think that such trading is acceptable because it is supposedly allowed by Fed’s current policies only highlights that the Fed’s policies are woefully deficient,” Kelleher told CNBC.

THE PRESIDENT: Here’s the simple truth. 

For a long time, this economy has worked great for those at the very top, while ordinary, hardworking Americans — the people who built this country — have been basically cut out of the deal.


And I’ve said this from the time I announced I was going to run: I believe this is a moment of potentially great change. 

This is our moment to deal working people back into the economy. 

This is our moment to prove to the American people that their government works for them, not just for the big corporations and those at the very top.

When I was sworn in as President, the nation was struggling to pull out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. 

Job growth was anemic, with just over 60,000 new jobs per month in the three months before I was sworn in.

Then we went to work and passed the American Rescue Plan back in March. 

And it worked. 

It’s still working.

Over the last three months, we’ve been creating, on average, 750,000 new jobs per month. 

Our economy is growing at the fastest rate we’ve seen in nearly 40 years.

Our recovery is unique in the world. 

We’re the only developed country in the world whose economy is now bigger than it was before the pandemic.

While this is all good news, I know many Americans are still struggling to make it through each and every day.

For too many, it’s harder and harder to pay the bills — food, gas, rent, healthcare. 

I get it. 

We still have a long way to go to get the economy where it needs to be.

As I’ve said for a long time: Coming out of this economic crisis as deep as the one we were in was never going to be easy. 

But we’re doing it, and we can continue to do it.

COVID, supply chain issues, and bad actors seeking to profit off the pandemic are all contributing to the challenges we’re facing.

That’s why I’ve made getting COVID under control my top priority from my first day as President. 

Everything — everything, from our public health to our economy, depends on this.

We made enormous progress against the virus through the summer, and now we’ve put ourselves in a strong position to battle this Delta variant. 

That’s why the actions I proposed on vaccines last week are so critical: from requiring federal workers to get vaccinated; requiring healthcare workers to be vaccinated; requiring employers with over 100 employees to institute vaccine and/or test protocols, calling on — for them to be able to know what their employers — their employees are doing before they walk through the door; calling for vaccine or test requirements to enter big venues; and a whole series of steps I proposed to protect our kids in schools.

Wall Street firms have analyzed the impact of these plans, and they’re projecting that these new requirements will help 12 million more Americans get vaccinated, which will help more businesses stay open and more Americans back to work.

The data shows that the overwhelming majority of Americans agree with my proposal. 

That’s — there’s no surprise, given that 76 percent of American adults have already gotten at least one shot.

But — but we’re facing a lot of pushback, especially from some of the Republican governors. 

The governors of Florida and Texas — they’re doing everything they can to undermine the lifesaving requirements that I’ve proposed.

And some of the same governors attacking me are in states with some the strictest vaccine mandates for children attending school in the entire country.

TO BE CONTINUED ...
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

THE PRESIDENT: For example, in Mississippi, children are required to be vaccinated against measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, hepatitis B, polio, tetanus, and more. 

These are state requirements.

But in the midst of a pandemic that has already taken over 660,000 lives, I propose a requirement for COVID vaccines, and the governor of that state calls it, quote, a “tyrannical-type move”? 

A “tyrannical-type move”?

This is the worst kind of politics because it’s putting the lives of citizens of their states, especially children, at risk. 

And I refuse to give in to it.

These policies are what the science tells us we need to do.

They’re going to save lives. 

And they’ll protect our economic recovery as well, and allow the economy to continue to grow.

We’re also going after the bad actors and pandemic profiteers in our economy. 

There’s a lot of evidence that gas prices should be going down, but they haven’t. 

We’ll be taking a close look at that.


Taxpayers in this country also have paid for extraordinary effort to keep our country going over the past year or so.

Unlike the last administration, which resisted oversight and allowed taxpayers to be victimized by fraud, we’re working hard to protect vulnerable Americans from having their identities stolen — as a consequence of their unemployment check stolen as well.

TO BE CONTINUED ...
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

THE LOS ANGELES TIMES

Nancy Pelosi - $16.0 million minimum net worth

House Minority Leader Pelosi’s (D-San Francisco) minimum net worth dropped $16 million over the last year due to a new $5 million mortgage and an $11 million decrease in assets.

Pelosi’s spouse, Paul Pelosi, owned about $27 million in assets, mostly in real estate — $18 million spread among nine properties.

Pelosi listed a new mortgage of $5 million on an existing vineyard in St. Helena.

In previous years, Pelosi had listed a $1 million mortgage for the same property.


https://www.latimes.com/projects/how-mu ... cy-pelosi/
REUTERS

"U.S. Speaker Pelosi: Capitalism has not served our economy as well as it could"

Reuters

September 17, 2021

LONDON, Sept 17 (Reuters) - Capitalism has not served the U.S. economy as well as it could have, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Friday, saying that the system needed to be improved.

"In America, capitalism is our system, it is our economic system, but it has not served our economy as well as it should," she told a Chatham House event.

"So what we want to do is not depart from that, but to improve it."

"You cannot have a system where the success of some springs from the exploitation of the workers and springs from the exploitation of the environment and the rest, and we have to correct that."


https://www.reuters.com/business/sustai ... 021-09-17/
THE PRESIDENT: And we’re going offer organized criminal — we’re going to go after organized criminals that defraud America or misuse COVID funds.

Look, we’re also taking a closer look at places in our economy where fewer and fewer corporate giants are controlling more and more of the marketplace in the area that they work.

Just look at agriculture and the food industry. 

A very small number of giant corporations now dominate the market, which gives them the ability to drive up prices because they face so little competition.

As we work to build healthier competition in our economy and crack down on bad actors, the American Rescue Plan, which we passed in March, is still working to give hardworking Americans — hardworking people some relief.

One of the best examples of that relief is the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, which, in effect, is essentially a historic tax cut for families with children.

Just yesterday, 39 million working moms and dads got their direct payment. 

That money is going to help cover groceries, the mortgage, new pairs of shoes — all the things that kids need. 

It’s a tax cut for working families.

So, we’re working to provide as much relief as we can right now to American families. 

But here’s the truth: Yes, the pandemic has caused a lot of economic problems in the country, but the fact is our economy faced challenges long before this pandemic struck. 

Working people were struggling to make it long before the pandemic arrived.

Big corporations and the very wealthy were doing very well before the pandemic. 

That’s why I’ve said — starting back in my campaign for president — that it’s not enough just to build back; we have to build back better than before. 

And that’s how it all begins.


Big corporations and the super wealthy have to start paying their fair share of taxes. 

It’s long overdue.

I’m not out to punish anyone. 

I’m a capitalist.


If you can make a million or a billion dollars, that’s great. 

God bless you. 

All I’m asking is you pay your fair share. 

Pay your fair share just like middle-class folks do. 

But that isn’t happening now.

Today, in this country, right now, the top 1 percent, for example, evade an estimated $160 billion in taxes that they owe each year. 

Not new taxes, taxes that they owe.

And the way it works is this: If you’re a typical American — like I suspect most of the press people sitting in front of me here — you pay your taxes. 

Why? 

Because you get a W-2 form. 

It comes in the mail every year.

The IRS gets that information as well. 

Your taxes get deducted from your paycheck, and you pay what is owed beyond that. 

That’s why about 99 percent of working people pay the taxes they owe.

But that’s not how it works for people with tens of millions of dollars. 

They play by a different set of rules.


And they’re often not employees themselves, so the IRS can’t see what they make and can’t tell if they’re cheating.

TO BE CONTINUED ...
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

THE PRESIDENT: That’s how many of the top 1 percent get away with paying virtually nothing. 

It’s estimated by serious economists that that number is about $160 billion collectively owed each year that doesn’t get paid. 

It’s not an even playing field. 

My plan would help solve that. 

For example, it would give the IRS the resources it needs to keep up with the lawyers and accountants in the super — of the super-wealthy.

It would ask just for two pieces of information from the banks of these folks: that amounts — the amounts that come into their bank accounts and what amounts go out of their bank accounts, so that the wealthy can no longer hide what they’re making and they can finally begin to pay their fair share of what they owe.


That isn’t about raising their taxes. 

It’s about the super-wealthy finally beginning to pay what they owe — what the existing tax code calls for — just like hardworking Americans do all over this country every Tax Day.

Look — and like I said just a few minutes ago, 55 of the most profitable corporations in America paid zero in federal income taxes on what amounted to $40 billion in profit. 

Not a penny. 

That’s not right. 

And my economic plan will change that. 

Not punish anybody, just make them pay their fair share.

But my Republican friends in Congress don’t want to change the law. 

So, what are they doing? 

They’re attacking me and my plan — which is fine. 

But if we’re going to have a debate, let’s have an honest debate.

My Republican friends are attacking my plan, saying it’s “big spending.” 

Let me remind you, these are the same folks who just four years ago passed the Trump tax cut totaling almost $2 trillion in tax cuts –- a giant giveaway to the largest corporations and the top 1 percent. 

And listen to this: Almost none of that $2 trillion tax cut was paid for. 

It just ballooned the federal deficit.

In fact, the unpa- — unpaid bills ranked up — racked up by the last administration are projected to increase the national debt by more than $8 trillion over time.

What I’m proposing is totally different from that approach for three reasons:

First, my plan is paid for. 

It’s fiscally responsible, because our investments are paid for that by making sure that corporations and the wealthy Americans pay their fair share.

Second, we’re not going to raise taxes on anyone making under $400,000. 

That’s a lot of money. 

Some of my liberal friends are saying it should be lower than that. 

But only corporations and people making over $400,000 a year are going to pay any additional tax.

And third, not only will no one making under $400,000 see their taxes go up, the middle class are going to going to get some tax cuts — some breaks.

TO BE CONTINUED ...
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

REUTERS

"TREASURIES-Treasury yields see-saw as Fed to 'soon' reduce bond buying"

By Herbert Lash

SEPTEMBER 22, 2021

The Fed indicated it sees inflation running this year at 4.2%, more than double its target rate.

THE PRESIDENT: My plan benefits ordinary Americans, not those at the top who don’t need the help. 

It’s a historic middle-class tax cut, cutting taxes for over 50 million families.

My Republican friends are making a different choice though. 

They’d rather protect the tax breaks of those at the very top than give tax breaks to working families. 

It’s that simple.

But let me ask you this: Where is it written that all the tax breaks in the American tax code go to corporations and the very top? 

I think it’s enough. 

I’m tired of it.

For me, it’s pretty simple: It’s about time working people got the tax breaks in this country. 

That’s what my plan does.

But here’s what it also does: By asking big corporations and the very wealthy to pay their fair share, it makes it possible to invest in America, to invest in the American people.

According to leading economists — forecasters like Moody’s and major international financial institutions — my plan will create — make us — create jobs, make us more competitive, and grow our economy and lessen — lessen, not increase — inflationary pressure.

I don’t know if it’s been handed out today, but, by the way, 15 Nobel laureates in economics released a letter yesterday arguing that exame [sic] — that exact same point.

They said, and I quote — and this is from 15 Nobel laureates in economics — quote, “Because this agenda…” — the one I’m talking about, mine — “Because this agenda invests in long-term economic capacity and will enhance the ability of more Americans to participate productively in the economy, it will ease long-term inflationary pressures.” 

It will ease it.

Let me highlight just a few provisions of my plan.  I know this is long, and I apologize, but it’s important, I think.

My plan lowers the cost of daycare and childcare and eldercare for families and [has] the added benefit of allowing millions of people, mostly women — who are not able to go back to work because of very young family members or elderly people they’re taking care of — allow them to go back to work.  It’s estimated in the millions that can’t go back.

It lowers healthcare premiums for millions of families.  It lowers prescription drug costs by giving Medicare the power to negotiate lower drug prices.  And it strengthens Medicare by adding dental, vision, and hearing coverage for — if you’re on Medicare.

It also extends the tax cut for families with kids that we passed in the American Rescue Plan in March.

All of this will mean thousands of dollars in savings for the average American family on some of the toughest and most important bills they have to pay every month.

My Republican friends talk a lot about inflation, but if you want to talk about actually lowering the cost of living for people in this country, my plan does just that.

By strengthening the capacity of our economy, it will also reduce inflationary pressures over the long run.


TO BE CONTINUED ...
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

THE PRESIDENT: Here’s something else my plan does: It confronts the crisis of extreme weather events that we’re seeing all around us and around the world — but just here in America. 

We see it everywhere. 

We know it’s real.

In just the past few weeks — and there’s more to come — I’ve seen the destruction of hurricanes in Louisiana, where winds got up to a hundred- — gusts of 179 miles an hour; the deadly toll from flooding in New York, where 20 inches of rain, and New Jersey, more than 11 inches of rain in some areas.

More than 5 million acres of our lands and communities have burned to the ground in wildfires just this year alone. 

That’s more than the size of the entire state of New Jersey burned to the ground. 

When I was out in California, I flew over some of these areas.

In addition, there’s a severe drought in the West and the Midwest.

There’s a blinking code red out there for the nation. 

We can’t wait to act.

Extreme weather, just last year, cost the American public $99 billion in damage — $99 billion in damage last year. 

And unfortunately, we’re likely to break that record this year.

And the evidence is overwhelming that every dollar we invest in resilience saves six dollars down the road — when the next fire doesn’t spread as widely or the power station holds up against the storm.

We need to rebuild with resilience — with resilience in mind — so roads are built higher; levees are built more — made more strong — stronger; transmission lines are better protected, and so much more.

You know, I hope we’re past debating climate change in this country. 

Now we have to act, and we have to act fast. 

And my plan does that.

Let me end with this. 

This pandemic has been God-awful for so many reasons: the lost lives — as I said, over 660,000; the jobs, the businesses lost; the lost time in school for our kids.

But it does present us with an opportunity: We can build an economy that gives working people a fair shot this time. 

We can restore some sanity and fairness to our tax code.


We can make the investments that we know are long overdue in this nation.

That’s exactly what my bipartisan infrastructure plan does — I should say, our bipartisan infrastructure plan does: investments in roads, bridges, highways; clean water in every home and every school; universal broadband; quality and affordable places for families to live.

And we can invest in our people — giving our families a little help with their toughest expenses, like daycare, childcare, eldercare, prescription drugs, healthcare, preparing our young people to compete against any country in the world with preschool and community college.

We can confront this crisis of extreme weather and climate change, and not only protect our communities but create new opportunities, new industries, and new jobs.

In short, this is an opportunity to be the nation we know we can be — a nation where all of us — all of us, not just those at the top — are getting a share of the benefits of a growing economy in the years ahead.

Let’s not squander this moment trying to preserve an economy that hasn’t worked too well for Americans for a long time.

Let’s not look backward, just trying to rebuild what we had. 

Let’s look forward, together, as one America — not to build back, but to build back better.


Thank you all very much. 

And God bless you all. 

May God protect our troops. 

Thank you.

2:22 P.M. EDT
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 74159
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 BIDEN COMMENTS ON ECONOMY

Post by thelivyjr »

Q Mr. President, just to follow up on COVID, if I can, quickly —

THE PRESIDENT: Sure.

Q What do you say to Americans who disregard the new CDC guidance and get a booster shot anyway?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I — I don’t — I’m not sure how they get it, but —

Q There are people who go into stores right now and just have got it without any high-risk situation or underneath that age limit; it happens around the country as we speak.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think what’s going to happen is you’re going to see that, in the near term — or we’re probably going to open this up anyway. 

They’re constantly looking at — we’re looking at both Moderna and J&J. 

And we’re both — as I said in the speech — in addition to that, we’re also looking to the time when we’re going to be able to expand the booster shots, basically, across the board.

So, I would just say: It’d be better to wait your turn in line, wait your — you know, in line — wait — wait your turn and to — to get there.

Q Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: Ken.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. 

When you met with congressional leaders this week, you told them to try to find a number less than $3.5 trillion on the reconciliation package that they could live with. 

What is that topline number in your mind as you deliberate these considerations?

And then, separately, you mentioned how you’re going to pay for some of these provisions. 

Senator Wyden has a proposal on annual taxes on billionaires’ unrealized gains. 

Is that a proposal that you support?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I do. 

I — look, I support a lot of these proposals. 

We don’t need all the things I support to pay for this, but I do support that.

Look, you — if you — if you get a — if you file with a W-2 form, you know, the IRS has access to your bank account and your bank tells you how much you made, what you have in there, and, you know — and they estimate your tax.

Well, if you — if you have no income, you’re just — it’s all — if you have no earned income and it’s all investment income, it’s hard to figure out what the hell you — excuse me — what the heck you have.

And that’s why we have to — and I know some people don’t like this — that’s why we have to rehire some IRS agents. 

And not to do anything, not to try to make people pay something they don’t owe — just say, “Hey, step up."

"Step up and pay like everybody else does."


Look, I really mean this. 

Look at my whole career — and I come from, you know, the corporate state of America. 

I just think it’s about just paying your fair share, for Lord’s sake.

Now, we can argue whether or not the corporate tax should go back up to 26 and a half percent or 28 or 24, but the idea that 50 — 50 major corporations in America, making a sum total of $40 billion pays zero? 

Come on. 

Come on. 

It’s just wrong. 

It’s just not fair. 

And I think is beginning to, you know, sink through the ether a little bit here on the part of people.

So, I think there clearly is enough from a panoply of options to pay for whatever it is that folks decide to pay for.

And let me finish by answering the initial part of your question, if I may. 

The way I look at it is what I’ve been telling my colleagues, and it surprises them sometimes when we — in those rooms. 

And I don’t know whether you heard, but both meetings went very well. 

I mean, it was — it was — they were collegial. 

It — it wasn’t — no one was hollering. 

Everybody was — you know. 

And people were hanging out afterwards in the Oval, and — anyway — both the progressives, as well as the — the moderates.

And one of the things that I think is important for — and I’m trying to get people to focus on is: What is it you like? 

What do you think we sh- — no, don’t — forget a number. 

What do you think we should be doing? 

Is it appropriate, in your view, to cut taxes for working-class people by providing for daycare, providing for early education, three and four years old? 

Is it appropriate to do something about free community college or do you want a — means tested? 

I’m telling them, “What — what are your priorities?”

And several of them, when they go through their priorities, it adds up to a number higher than they said they were for.

Because I think this is — we’re getting down to the — you know, the hard spot here. 

People are having now to go in and look in detail as to what it is specifically they’re for.

It’s a little bit like when we went through — and I’ll end with this — it’s a little bit like when we went through the issue of the bipartisan deal on infrastructure. 

There were a lot of negotiations on that. 

And it wasn’t until people were forced to look at: What are you for? 

Are you for taking care of that highway or bridge in your state or that region — in your region? 

Are you for doing something about environmental degradation? 

Are you for something that deals with allowing us to provide for monies to states so that they can, in fact, deal with things like what happened in states where the major utility lines come down? 

What do we — what do you do to build those back better to pre- — prevent that from happening?

And it’s sort of a — there’s a — and you all speak to all these folks, so — you speak to as many as I do. 

I find that they’re going, “Huh, I never really thought that through before." 

"I think it makes sense.”

And that’s how we finally got to a bipartisan deal on what is a serious infrastructure proposal that really does a number of things, including — including things where people said, “I don’t want to do anything in the environment,” and then they start thinking, “Well, wait a minute."

"I have all these diesel buses at home."

"It would be a hell lot better if we had electric buses."

"It wouldn’t change the circumstances on boom, boom, boom.”

So, I think this is a process. 

That’s why I said at the front end that, although we got off to a very fast start with the first piece of legislation, I don’t expect this to be done and us being in a position where we can look back and say, “Okay, did we get it done?” until basically the end of the year.

I don’t mean the vote on the two pieces of legislation related to the economy. 

But I think it’s just going to take some time.

And look, you know, we’re — my guess is, we all come from similar backgrounds.

Remember you used to sit around the table — the kitchen table in the morning, if you had the chance to do that, or dinner at night with your mom and dad and your brothers or sisters. 

What did people talk about? 

They talked about, you know, “Are we going to be able to pay the mortgage?” 

At least my house.

I mean, “What’s going to happen if we have another one of those floods, and then, you know, it blows through here like it did in Queens?"

"What’s going to happen?"

"What are we going to do?”

“And, by the way, I don’t — I don’t — you know — you know, I — I’m just not sure that I want, you know, my son or daughter to — to be going into school when so many people are not vaccinated." 

"I mean, you know, it’s just — you know, I’m not sure I want Kenny to be there doing this…”


But these are practical things people are talking about. 

And they’re looking down the road, and they’re looking at cost-of-living issues as well. 

And so what’s the cost-of-living issues?

Well, it’s because we’re in a position where the ability to have the product — the elements of the production of a product that, in fact, need to go into the production of that product, are — are hard to get hold on of because people are in trouble. 

They’re not able to produce them. 

They’re not able to get it, or they’re being hoarded. 

It’s like, you know, what we have with — and we’re making progress, but like what we’re doing with regard to making sure we have the computer chips to be able to keep as — in the vernacular — to keep — you know, build automobiles.


I mean, I think, everybody was kind of surprised when I — I think if I had said to you — I may be dead wrong, but if I had said to you in, say, April that I was going to get all three major manufacturers of American automobiles saying they’re going to go electric, I doubt whether you thought I — that could be done.

Well, we’re out here in the back lawn; they’ve all of a sudden figured it out. 

They’ve had a bit of an epiphany. 

And they’ve realized, “Whoa, wait a minute, man."

"China is investing billions of dollars."

"China is — they’re getting battery technology."

"We’re going to be — blah, blah."

"And this is going to happen anyway.”


And, again, I’ll just conclude by saying: This is a process, and it’s going to be up and down. 

That’s why I don’t look at the polls — (laughs) — not a joke — because it’s going to go up and it’s going to go down. 

It’s going to go up.

And hopefully at the end of the day, I’ll be able to deliver on what I said I would do: one, bringing the country together on a few and very important things, like on infrastructure; getting us in a position where we can have some — some coherent policy, relative for foreign policy, where there is agreement; moving us in a position where we’re able to actually generate the kind of change in the dynamic of how we grow the economy — not eliminate the super wealthy, not at all, but allow the working class and the middle class to be able to build out and up. 

And that can be done.

And like I said, every time I hear — and I drive my staff crazy — every time I hear, “This is going to cost A, B, C, or D,” the truth is, based on the commitment that I made, it’s going to cost nothing because we’re going to raise the revenue — raise the revenue to pay for the things we’re talking about.

And we’re going to give and — and right now, if you take a look at the — the reconciliation piece, a trillion dollars of that is tax cuts, not raising anybody’s taxes; it’s tax cuts. 

People are going to be paying less taxes.


But the people who pay less taxes are going to be working-class folks. 

It’s going to put women back to work. 

It’s going to put people in situations where they have — as I know you’re tired of me saying, but I’ll never — my dad’s constant refrain: Just give people a little breathing room — a little breathing room.

Thank you, guys.

10:26 A.M. EDT
Post Reply