THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
"The Biden administration has launched its war on pro-lifers"
Opinion by Timothy P. Carney
26 SEPTEMBER 2022
The FBI on Friday morning arrested a pro-life activist at his home for a 2021 scuffle with a Planned Parenthood activist.
The family and friends of Mark Houck said the scuffle involved an abortion activist harassing and screaming at Houck’s 12-year-old son until Houck shoved the man to the ground.
In response, Houck’s family and friends have told reporters, the FBI this weekend sent a platoon of agents with weapons drawn to arrest Houck at his house.
Even if you take only the FBI’s version of the tale, the Biden administration assembled a grand jury, secured an indictment, and charged a man with a federal crime possibly carrying an 11-year sentence because he shoved another man who received “injuries … that required medical attention.”
Because there is an extraordinary federal law protecting abortionists from protesters, sidewalk counselors, and rosary prayers, Houck is now charged with a federal felony.
This only makes sense in a political context.
Specifically, the Biden White House and the Democratic Party on the state and federal levels have declared a legal war on pro-lifers, while vigilante abortion defenders wage a parallel war of arson, vandalism, and harassment.
“I met with many of you in my office at the White House,” Vice President Kamala Harris told Democratic state attorneys general at a conference on Thursday.
“And we discussed the innovative strategies that you have used to defend women's reproductive freedom.”
What are those “innovative strategies?”
They seem to include the persecution of abortionists' competition.
The very first example Harris gave was: “You are taking on, rightly, the crisis pregnancy centers.”
The vice president, who has said she approaches abortion policy like “a prosecutor,” is siccing state attorneys general on the nonprofit organizations that serve mothers in crisis pregnancies because those nonprofit organizations don’t abort the babies that come through their doors.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has said she wants crisis pregnancy centers "shut down."
That was the same day a crisis pregnancy center outside of Detroit was attacked for the second time, with death threats spray-painted.
More than 70 such attacks have happened in the past few months, and the Biden administration has said and done nothing about it.
It’s as if they’re fine with the threats, arson, and vandalism.
But a sidewalk scuffle brings in the full force of the FBI on one of the two men involved?
It sure looks like part of the Biden administration’s defense of abortion is to outlaw pro-life activity.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 3b52adcb0e
KAMALA HARRIS
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 AT 8:53 PM
Paul Plante says:
VI. AMERICAN AUTOCRAT/THEOCRAT JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JUNIOR AT WAR WITH THE TRUTH; ANATHEMATIZES MEMBERS OF SUPREME COURT WHO DARED TO DEFY HIS WILL AS TO THE MEANING OF CONSTITUTION; ACTIVELY INCITES VIOLENCE TOWARDS MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME COURT TO PUNISH THEM FOR GOING AGAINST JOE’S WILL WHILE INCITING REBELLION, SEDITION, INSURRECTION, AND YES, TREASON, AMONG THE WOMEN OF AMERICA!
Yes, people – anathematize, which is a big, old-fashioned, largely unheard-of-today word with a lot of syllables in it that I personally never thought would be or could be applied to an American president, because to “anathematize” someone or several someones in this case, they being the Supreme Court Justices who signed onto Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization et al., No. 19–1392, decided June 24, 2022, wherein was held by those now-anathematized Justices that OUR Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives, is to curse them and condemn them as in “Pope Gregory IX, in 1263, declaring ‘We excommunicate and anathematize all heretics, Cathars, Patarenes, Poor Men of Lyons, Passagini,'” or “the Third Council of Constantinople anathematized Pope Honorius as a leader of the Monothelite heresy.”
So the key word there, and this is what the American autocrat/theocrat Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior is applying to the members of the Supreme Court who signed onto Dobbs, is heresy, which is herein defined as “opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted,” where in this case what is “generally accepted” is that in some undefined manner, the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution grants women in America a Constitutional right to murder unborn children.
And to gain a better understanding of this heresy, and who the heretics are who need to be anathematized, this before I go into the actual wording of Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization et al., let’s do some review of recent American history since Dobbs was decided, first by going to a Fox News article titled “AOC wonders if pro-life Democrats should continue to serve: ‘We really need to reassess'” by Cortney O’Brien on 26 June 2022, where we had the heretics identified as follows, to wit:
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., suggested in an Instagram video Saturday night that pro-life Democrats should no longer serve in the wake of the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade.
end quotes
Pro-life Democrats, people, are heretics, and as such, should not have a voice in American politics, period!
Like the Cathars, they must be suppressed!
No ifs, ands or buts about it!
We do not want and do not need heretics in America, and Joe Biden and his Biden Democrats are going to root them out and rid of them, just as the Cathars were rooted out and gotten rid of back when, which takes us back to Fox News, as follows:
Several other Democrats and liberal media figures have sounded off on the abortion ruling in the past few days, with Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison calling the decision “illegitimate.”
“It isn’t up to you, this illegitimate court, or a bunch of state elected officials to decide what happens to a woman’s body… that choice belongs to a woman and no one else!”
“Period!!!” the DNC chairman said.
end quotes
IT’S WAR, people!
THE DEMOCRAT NATIONAL COMMITTEE HAS DECLARED WAR AGAINST THE TRUTH, THE FACTS, THE SUPREME COURT, RULE OF LAW, AND THOSE OF US WHO BELIEVE IN RULE OF LAW!
And here comes autocrat/theocrat Joe Biden into the fray, to wit:
President Biden responded to the abortion ruling, saying the Court ended what he claimed “was a correct decision,” and that it “expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized.”
end quotes
Now, people, it is America, and in America, even a moron like Joe Biden gets to have and express an opinion, even if the opinion expressed, like that one, is not only stupid, but dead wrong!
But this is no longer that America, people, where RULE OF LAW applies.
This is Joe Biden’s version of America, and in Joe Biden’s version of America, it is he who is the ultimate decider of what the Constitution means, not the Supreme Court, and when the Supreme Court dares to go against what Joe Biden says the Constitution means, then it is the Supreme Court that is wrong, because as our autocrat/theocrat, Joe Biden is infallible!
And what about the violence that Joe Biden’s toxic rhetoric on abortion is stoking, violence Joe is not condemning, nor are the Democrats?
Let’s go back to Fox and see, to wit:
Pro-life pregnancy centers have also been vandalized in the days following the ruling.
The group “Jane’s Revenge” claimed responsibility for a handful of the attacks and published a letter this month declaring “open season” on crisis pregnancy facilities.
end quotes
Now, imagine if that were PROUD BOYS publicly declaring “open season” on something in America!
Oh, the hue and cry and keening and ululating by the Democrats would be deafening!
But when it is Democrats promoting violence, there is a complete HUSH, especially in the “PRO-JOE” main-stream and legacy media, but it does not stop there, which takes us to a National Review article titled “Violent Portland Pro-Abortion Protesters Destroy, Vandalize Property” by Caroline Downey on 26 June 2022, where we have more of the violence Joe Biden and the Democrats are promoting and provoking with their toxic and poisonous and insurrectionist rhetoric, to wit:
Pro-abortion protesters in Portland, Oregon charged through the city Saturday night, damaging and vandalizing property following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade.
end quotes
And my goodness, people, their feelings were hurt by the Supreme Court, so of course they have a right to lash out in return and destroy stuff that they couldn’t build and that belongs to others who they don’t like, which takes us back to the National Review for more, to wit:
A crowd of about 60 black-clad marchers stormed downtown Portland, the Hollywood district specifically, “breaking windows and scrawling graffiti,” a Portland police report notes.
end quotes
AND NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT, STARTING WITH JOE BIDEN, CONDEMNED THEM FOR IT, AS THEY CONDEMN THE JANUARY 6th RIOTERS.
Going back to the National Review, we have more as follows:
“Officers were monitoring the crowd, but did not have resources to intervene in the moment,” it said.
Damage inflicted by the rioters included broken windows on several banks and coffee shops.
Protesters also vandalized a pregnancy resource facility, the Mother and Child Education Center, and broke the windows of and spray-painted a van owned by Portland Public Schools.
“If abortions aren’t safe then you aren’t either,” a flier advertising the march read, Oregonlive reported.
This slogan has, especially in the last month, been loosely associated with Jane’s Revenge, a collective of pro-abortion terrorists that has allegedly targeted dozens of pro-life pregnancy centers nationwide with firebombing and arson.
Earlier in June, activists claiming to represent Jane’s Revenge promised to unleash a new rampage of violence on clinics providing an alternative to abortion, announcing it “open season.”
On a storage box read the phrase “abort the court,” OregonLive reported.
end quotes
Are those open calls for violence, people?
Can you imagine the outcry if people alleged by the Democrats to be Trump supporters promised to unleash a new rampage of violence on clinics catering to the trans-gender crowd Joe Biden is so enamoured of?
Can you imagine the outcry if MAGA Republicans were targeting places where the LGBQT crowd gathers for their social events with firebombing and arson?
Or historically black churches?
Joe Biden would have every FBI agent there is searching them down to the ends of the earth to put an end to them, especially as Joe Biden has determined that white supremacy is the gravest domestic threat there is or can ever be to his democracy.
But when it is Democrat-protected groups performing the acts of violence, all we hear from Joe Biden and the Democrats is total silence.
WHY?
And before we go further on this subject of Joe Biden’s MASSIVE HUGE GREAT BIG LIES about abortion, let me stop here for a moment to let all that sink in, and after a station break for station identification, we will be right back with more, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial!
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-696764
Paul Plante says:
VI. AMERICAN AUTOCRAT/THEOCRAT JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JUNIOR AT WAR WITH THE TRUTH; ANATHEMATIZES MEMBERS OF SUPREME COURT WHO DARED TO DEFY HIS WILL AS TO THE MEANING OF CONSTITUTION; ACTIVELY INCITES VIOLENCE TOWARDS MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME COURT TO PUNISH THEM FOR GOING AGAINST JOE’S WILL WHILE INCITING REBELLION, SEDITION, INSURRECTION, AND YES, TREASON, AMONG THE WOMEN OF AMERICA!
Yes, people – anathematize, which is a big, old-fashioned, largely unheard-of-today word with a lot of syllables in it that I personally never thought would be or could be applied to an American president, because to “anathematize” someone or several someones in this case, they being the Supreme Court Justices who signed onto Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization et al., No. 19–1392, decided June 24, 2022, wherein was held by those now-anathematized Justices that OUR Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives, is to curse them and condemn them as in “Pope Gregory IX, in 1263, declaring ‘We excommunicate and anathematize all heretics, Cathars, Patarenes, Poor Men of Lyons, Passagini,'” or “the Third Council of Constantinople anathematized Pope Honorius as a leader of the Monothelite heresy.”
So the key word there, and this is what the American autocrat/theocrat Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior is applying to the members of the Supreme Court who signed onto Dobbs, is heresy, which is herein defined as “opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted,” where in this case what is “generally accepted” is that in some undefined manner, the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution grants women in America a Constitutional right to murder unborn children.
And to gain a better understanding of this heresy, and who the heretics are who need to be anathematized, this before I go into the actual wording of Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization et al., let’s do some review of recent American history since Dobbs was decided, first by going to a Fox News article titled “AOC wonders if pro-life Democrats should continue to serve: ‘We really need to reassess'” by Cortney O’Brien on 26 June 2022, where we had the heretics identified as follows, to wit:
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., suggested in an Instagram video Saturday night that pro-life Democrats should no longer serve in the wake of the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade.
end quotes
Pro-life Democrats, people, are heretics, and as such, should not have a voice in American politics, period!
Like the Cathars, they must be suppressed!
No ifs, ands or buts about it!
We do not want and do not need heretics in America, and Joe Biden and his Biden Democrats are going to root them out and rid of them, just as the Cathars were rooted out and gotten rid of back when, which takes us back to Fox News, as follows:
Several other Democrats and liberal media figures have sounded off on the abortion ruling in the past few days, with Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison calling the decision “illegitimate.”
“It isn’t up to you, this illegitimate court, or a bunch of state elected officials to decide what happens to a woman’s body… that choice belongs to a woman and no one else!”
“Period!!!” the DNC chairman said.
end quotes
IT’S WAR, people!
THE DEMOCRAT NATIONAL COMMITTEE HAS DECLARED WAR AGAINST THE TRUTH, THE FACTS, THE SUPREME COURT, RULE OF LAW, AND THOSE OF US WHO BELIEVE IN RULE OF LAW!
And here comes autocrat/theocrat Joe Biden into the fray, to wit:
President Biden responded to the abortion ruling, saying the Court ended what he claimed “was a correct decision,” and that it “expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized.”
end quotes
Now, people, it is America, and in America, even a moron like Joe Biden gets to have and express an opinion, even if the opinion expressed, like that one, is not only stupid, but dead wrong!
But this is no longer that America, people, where RULE OF LAW applies.
This is Joe Biden’s version of America, and in Joe Biden’s version of America, it is he who is the ultimate decider of what the Constitution means, not the Supreme Court, and when the Supreme Court dares to go against what Joe Biden says the Constitution means, then it is the Supreme Court that is wrong, because as our autocrat/theocrat, Joe Biden is infallible!
And what about the violence that Joe Biden’s toxic rhetoric on abortion is stoking, violence Joe is not condemning, nor are the Democrats?
Let’s go back to Fox and see, to wit:
Pro-life pregnancy centers have also been vandalized in the days following the ruling.
The group “Jane’s Revenge” claimed responsibility for a handful of the attacks and published a letter this month declaring “open season” on crisis pregnancy facilities.
end quotes
Now, imagine if that were PROUD BOYS publicly declaring “open season” on something in America!
Oh, the hue and cry and keening and ululating by the Democrats would be deafening!
But when it is Democrats promoting violence, there is a complete HUSH, especially in the “PRO-JOE” main-stream and legacy media, but it does not stop there, which takes us to a National Review article titled “Violent Portland Pro-Abortion Protesters Destroy, Vandalize Property” by Caroline Downey on 26 June 2022, where we have more of the violence Joe Biden and the Democrats are promoting and provoking with their toxic and poisonous and insurrectionist rhetoric, to wit:
Pro-abortion protesters in Portland, Oregon charged through the city Saturday night, damaging and vandalizing property following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade.
end quotes
And my goodness, people, their feelings were hurt by the Supreme Court, so of course they have a right to lash out in return and destroy stuff that they couldn’t build and that belongs to others who they don’t like, which takes us back to the National Review for more, to wit:
A crowd of about 60 black-clad marchers stormed downtown Portland, the Hollywood district specifically, “breaking windows and scrawling graffiti,” a Portland police report notes.
end quotes
AND NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT, STARTING WITH JOE BIDEN, CONDEMNED THEM FOR IT, AS THEY CONDEMN THE JANUARY 6th RIOTERS.
Going back to the National Review, we have more as follows:
“Officers were monitoring the crowd, but did not have resources to intervene in the moment,” it said.
Damage inflicted by the rioters included broken windows on several banks and coffee shops.
Protesters also vandalized a pregnancy resource facility, the Mother and Child Education Center, and broke the windows of and spray-painted a van owned by Portland Public Schools.
“If abortions aren’t safe then you aren’t either,” a flier advertising the march read, Oregonlive reported.
This slogan has, especially in the last month, been loosely associated with Jane’s Revenge, a collective of pro-abortion terrorists that has allegedly targeted dozens of pro-life pregnancy centers nationwide with firebombing and arson.
Earlier in June, activists claiming to represent Jane’s Revenge promised to unleash a new rampage of violence on clinics providing an alternative to abortion, announcing it “open season.”
On a storage box read the phrase “abort the court,” OregonLive reported.
end quotes
Are those open calls for violence, people?
Can you imagine the outcry if people alleged by the Democrats to be Trump supporters promised to unleash a new rampage of violence on clinics catering to the trans-gender crowd Joe Biden is so enamoured of?
Can you imagine the outcry if MAGA Republicans were targeting places where the LGBQT crowd gathers for their social events with firebombing and arson?
Or historically black churches?
Joe Biden would have every FBI agent there is searching them down to the ends of the earth to put an end to them, especially as Joe Biden has determined that white supremacy is the gravest domestic threat there is or can ever be to his democracy.
But when it is Democrat-protected groups performing the acts of violence, all we hear from Joe Biden and the Democrats is total silence.
WHY?
And before we go further on this subject of Joe Biden’s MASSIVE HUGE GREAT BIG LIES about abortion, let me stop here for a moment to let all that sink in, and after a station break for station identification, we will be right back with more, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial!
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-696764
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 AT 9:43 AM
Paul Plante says:
And my goodness, people, after the embarrassing spectacle Wednesday night of American autocrat/theocrat Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior’s cringe-worthy reference to a dead congresswoman, whom Biden called out to at a conference as if she were there, while Joe was speaking at the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition & Health, calling out “Jackie, are you here? Where’s Jackie? She must not be here,” while scanning the room for her, when are these worthless Republicans in the NANCY’S HOUSE going to finally get some guts and put together a RESOLUTION calling on Vice President Karmela Harris to convene and mobilize the principal officers of the executive departments of the Cabinet to activate section 4 of the 25th Amendment to declare President Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior incapable of executing the duties of his office and to immediately exercise powers as acting President?
It’s a simple matter, really, especially since the Republicans already have a template from when the Democrats tried to use it against Trump:
Whereas Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior has demonstrated repeatedly, continuously, and spectacularly his absolute inability to discharge the most basic and fundamental powers and duties of his office, including most recently the duty to respect the legitimate results of a Supreme Court decision, the duty to respect the separation of democratic power under the Constitution, the duty to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States, including the supporting, not reviling the Supreme Court, the duty to protect the people of the United States and their elected representatives against domestic insurrection, mob rule, and seditious violence related to abortions, and generally the duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls upon Vice President Karmela Harris —
(1) to immediately use her powers under section 4 of the 25th Amendment to convene and mobilize the principal officers of the executive departments in the Cabinet to declare what is obvious to a horrified Nation: That the President is unable to successfully discharge the duties and powers of his office; and
(2) to transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives notice that she will be immediately assuming the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/a ... ent-697262
Paul Plante says:
And my goodness, people, after the embarrassing spectacle Wednesday night of American autocrat/theocrat Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior’s cringe-worthy reference to a dead congresswoman, whom Biden called out to at a conference as if she were there, while Joe was speaking at the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition & Health, calling out “Jackie, are you here? Where’s Jackie? She must not be here,” while scanning the room for her, when are these worthless Republicans in the NANCY’S HOUSE going to finally get some guts and put together a RESOLUTION calling on Vice President Karmela Harris to convene and mobilize the principal officers of the executive departments of the Cabinet to activate section 4 of the 25th Amendment to declare President Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior incapable of executing the duties of his office and to immediately exercise powers as acting President?
It’s a simple matter, really, especially since the Republicans already have a template from when the Democrats tried to use it against Trump:
Whereas Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior has demonstrated repeatedly, continuously, and spectacularly his absolute inability to discharge the most basic and fundamental powers and duties of his office, including most recently the duty to respect the legitimate results of a Supreme Court decision, the duty to respect the separation of democratic power under the Constitution, the duty to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States, including the supporting, not reviling the Supreme Court, the duty to protect the people of the United States and their elected representatives against domestic insurrection, mob rule, and seditious violence related to abortions, and generally the duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls upon Vice President Karmela Harris —
(1) to immediately use her powers under section 4 of the 25th Amendment to convene and mobilize the principal officers of the executive departments in the Cabinet to declare what is obvious to a horrified Nation: That the President is unable to successfully discharge the duties and powers of his office; and
(2) to transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives notice that she will be immediately assuming the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/a ... ent-697262
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AT 2:55 PM
Paul Plante says:
VII. How militant and violent Pro-Abortion Whackos supported by American autocrat Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior and the Democrats are a clear and present danger to the rest of us who do not for a minute believe Jesus told Gavin Newsom of California that he was a proponent of abortion on demand in California.
Yes, people, if we are to believe Democrat GREAT WHITE HOPE Gavin Newson of California, the plastic Jesus Gavin Newsom has riding on the dashboard of his car, so that Gavin doesn’t have to care, like the rest of us, whether it rains or freezes, has told Gavin Newsom that he really is not only a proponent of abortion on demand, but a supporter, as well, as we clearly see by going to a Fox News article titled “Christians slam Newsom for ‘disgusting’ pro-abortion billboards quoting Jesus: ‘Satanic'” by Jon Brown on 22 September 2022, where we have as follows, to wit:
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom is taking flak from Christians who are offended by his multi-state billboard campaign that promotes abortion by quoting Jesus.
end quote
Which raises the serious question of which Jesus Gavin was quoting from.
Jesus Christ Superstar, maybe?
Or Black Jesus who signifies a radical faith without content; a faith which encourages believers to attentively listen for the personalized divine call echoing within their own unique experiences?
And while we try to puzzle that out, that story continues as follows:
Last week, Newsom took to Twitter to tout the billboards his gubernatorial campaign is erecting in Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi and four other “anti-freedom” states where abortion is restricted or outlawed.
end quotes
Ah, yes, people – FREEDOM!
That is really what this is all about – the UNRESTRICTED FREEDOM for women to kill unborn children without question, because they want to rid themselves of a nuisance before they have to change its diapers and lose their freedom by having to care for it, and besides, there is a growing industry that needs aborted fetuses for various commercial reasons, so it is win-win all the way around as far as they and the Jesus of Gavin Newsom, who may or may not be the Jesus of Joe Biden, a very devout Catholic himself who believes in abortion is a good thing for the Democrat to push as an issue, but there are certainly a lot of similarities, if they are not the same.
Going back to Jesus wanting women to come to California for their abortions, the story continues as follows:
Some versions of the billboards, all of which urge women in such states to come to California to get abortions, advertise the state’s easily obtainable abortions by quoting Mark 12:31, where Jesus says, “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
“There is no greater commandment than these.”
end quotes
And no, people, I did not write those words, and no, I am not making this stuff up, either, because if I tried to make it up, people wouldn’t believe it. because it sounds so goofy.
Going back for more, we have some serious and welcome pushback as follows:
“The idea that Newsom is using the words of Jesus Christ, the Holy Scriptures, to promote the killing of unborn children as somehow loving and commanded by God is quite frankly disgusting,” said Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law & Justice, in a statement to Fox News Digital.
“This is a blatant, political fundraising ploy to boost his own political profile and presidential aspirations.”
end quotes
And my goodness, people, of course it is a blatant, political fundraising ploy to boost his own political profile and presidential aspirations, for what else could it possibly be, other than the ravings of a madman, which brings us to this:
“The people are smarter than that.”
“It just won’t work,” Sekulow added.
end quotes
But are they really, people?
Are the people really smarter than that, or is that just wishful thinking on this dude’s part, keeping in mind that it is some of those people who saddled us with Joe Biden and who saddled to people of California with Gavin Newsom?
Going back to the pushback, we have more, as follows:
Many Twitter users echoed Sekulow’s sentiment, including Matthew P. Schneider, a Roman Catholic priest who serves as adjunct professor of theology at Belmont Abbey College in Charlotte, North Carolina.
He described Newsom’s billboards as “one of the [worst] distortions of a Bible passage I’ve ever seen.”
“Shame on [Newsom] and his government,” Schneider said.
“The most basic level of loving your neighbor as yourself is not killing your neighbor, yet that’s exactly what abortion does.”
“This is satanic,” tweeted Ryan Hilderbrand, a Roman Catholic priest from Indiana.
“Imagining the devil in his advertising office at the top of the highest skyscraper in hell giggling to himself as [Newsom] uses Jesus’ own words to support killing babies,” said Catholic Answers, a Catholic media ministry that went on in a nine-tweet thread to excoriate the Democrat governor for having “twisted” the words of the Bible.
Explaining how the verse Newsom cited was removed from the context of Jesus affirming the Old Testament command “to love the Lord your God with all your heart” as “the greatest commandment,” Catholic Answers tweeted, “No surprise here.”
“Satan, having no imagination, can only ‘create’ by perverting the good not of his making.”
“Likewise, it seems, for Gavin Newsom.”
“Wow …”
“So murdering your innocent unborn child is somehow ‘loving your neighbor,’” tweeted The Christian Outlook, a Christian media outlet.
“Let’s all pray for [Newsom], that he might get saved and see the value God places on every life, born and unborn.”
“Your religious beliefs have no place in our politics.”
“Except when we want to use them to troll people we hate, that’s fine,” tweeted canon lawyer Ed Condon, who also founded Catholic publication “The Pillar.”
“‘Good Catholic’ [Newsom] is now using Bible scriptures to encourage women to come to California to abort their babies,” wrote David Giglio, a former congressional candidate who is also a Catholic.
“A truly shameful display.”
“Meanwhile, in CA crime continues to skyrocket, the cost of living is out of control, and the state can’t even keep the lights on.”
The official Twitter account of the Mississippi GOP replied to Newsom’s taunt by tweeting simply: “Hey, [Newsom]. Is your electricity back on?”
Newsom’s campaign did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment by time of publication.
end quotes
And in the meantime, while that is all going on, we head over to the Washington Examiner for the other, far more serious side to this story of Joe Biden and the Democrats putting the full protection of the law over on the abortionists and baby killers, while at the same time, stripping those of us who do not believe like Joe Biden that killing unborn babies is the right thing to do, to a story titled “The Biden administration has launched its war on pro-lifers” by Timothy P. Carney on 26 September 2022, where we have the reality those of us who are not like Joe Biden PRO-ABORTION face, to wit:
The FBI on Friday morning arrested a pro-life activist at his home for a 2021 scuffle with a Planned Parenthood activist.
The family and friends of Mark Houck said the scuffle involved an abortion activist harassing and screaming at Houck’s 12-year-old son until Houck shoved the man to the ground.
In response, Houck’s family and friends have told reporters, the FBI this weekend sent a platoon of agents with weapons drawn to arrest Houck at his house.
Even if you take only the FBI’s version of the tale, the Biden administration assembled a grand jury, secured an indictment, and charged a man with a federal crime possibly carrying an 11-year sentence because he shoved another man who received “injuries … that required medical attention.”
Because there is an extraordinary federal law protecting abortionists from protesters, sidewalk counselors, and rosary prayers, Houck is now charged with a federal felony.
This only makes sense in a political context.
Specifically, the Biden White House and the Democratic Party on the state and federal levels have declared a legal war on pro-lifers, while vigilante abortion defenders wage a parallel war of arson, vandalism, and harassment.
The vice president, who has said she approaches abortion policy like “a prosecutor,” is siccing state attorneys general on the nonprofit organizations that serve mothers in crisis pregnancies because those nonprofit organizations don’t abort the babies that come through their doors.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has said she wants crisis pregnancy centers “shut down.”
That was the same day a crisis pregnancy center outside of Detroit was attacked for the second time, with death threats spray-painted.
More than 70 such attacks have happened in the past few months, and the Biden administration has said and done nothing about it.
It’s as if they’re fine with the threats, arson, and vandalism.
end quotes
And you know what, people – THEY ARE!
So will I have a platoon of FBI agents now coming after me with drawn guns for speaking out in here?
Will they have a heavily-armed SWAT team coming after Wayne Creed for even daring to host a discussion like this that is critical of Joe Biden’s stance on abortion?
Stay tuned is all I can say.
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Paul Plante says:
VII. How militant and violent Pro-Abortion Whackos supported by American autocrat Joseph Robinette Biden, Junior and the Democrats are a clear and present danger to the rest of us who do not for a minute believe Jesus told Gavin Newsom of California that he was a proponent of abortion on demand in California.
Yes, people, if we are to believe Democrat GREAT WHITE HOPE Gavin Newson of California, the plastic Jesus Gavin Newsom has riding on the dashboard of his car, so that Gavin doesn’t have to care, like the rest of us, whether it rains or freezes, has told Gavin Newsom that he really is not only a proponent of abortion on demand, but a supporter, as well, as we clearly see by going to a Fox News article titled “Christians slam Newsom for ‘disgusting’ pro-abortion billboards quoting Jesus: ‘Satanic'” by Jon Brown on 22 September 2022, where we have as follows, to wit:
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom is taking flak from Christians who are offended by his multi-state billboard campaign that promotes abortion by quoting Jesus.
end quote
Which raises the serious question of which Jesus Gavin was quoting from.
Jesus Christ Superstar, maybe?
Or Black Jesus who signifies a radical faith without content; a faith which encourages believers to attentively listen for the personalized divine call echoing within their own unique experiences?
And while we try to puzzle that out, that story continues as follows:
Last week, Newsom took to Twitter to tout the billboards his gubernatorial campaign is erecting in Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi and four other “anti-freedom” states where abortion is restricted or outlawed.
end quotes
Ah, yes, people – FREEDOM!
That is really what this is all about – the UNRESTRICTED FREEDOM for women to kill unborn children without question, because they want to rid themselves of a nuisance before they have to change its diapers and lose their freedom by having to care for it, and besides, there is a growing industry that needs aborted fetuses for various commercial reasons, so it is win-win all the way around as far as they and the Jesus of Gavin Newsom, who may or may not be the Jesus of Joe Biden, a very devout Catholic himself who believes in abortion is a good thing for the Democrat to push as an issue, but there are certainly a lot of similarities, if they are not the same.
Going back to Jesus wanting women to come to California for their abortions, the story continues as follows:
Some versions of the billboards, all of which urge women in such states to come to California to get abortions, advertise the state’s easily obtainable abortions by quoting Mark 12:31, where Jesus says, “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
“There is no greater commandment than these.”
end quotes
And no, people, I did not write those words, and no, I am not making this stuff up, either, because if I tried to make it up, people wouldn’t believe it. because it sounds so goofy.
Going back for more, we have some serious and welcome pushback as follows:
“The idea that Newsom is using the words of Jesus Christ, the Holy Scriptures, to promote the killing of unborn children as somehow loving and commanded by God is quite frankly disgusting,” said Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law & Justice, in a statement to Fox News Digital.
“This is a blatant, political fundraising ploy to boost his own political profile and presidential aspirations.”
end quotes
And my goodness, people, of course it is a blatant, political fundraising ploy to boost his own political profile and presidential aspirations, for what else could it possibly be, other than the ravings of a madman, which brings us to this:
“The people are smarter than that.”
“It just won’t work,” Sekulow added.
end quotes
But are they really, people?
Are the people really smarter than that, or is that just wishful thinking on this dude’s part, keeping in mind that it is some of those people who saddled us with Joe Biden and who saddled to people of California with Gavin Newsom?
Going back to the pushback, we have more, as follows:
Many Twitter users echoed Sekulow’s sentiment, including Matthew P. Schneider, a Roman Catholic priest who serves as adjunct professor of theology at Belmont Abbey College in Charlotte, North Carolina.
He described Newsom’s billboards as “one of the [worst] distortions of a Bible passage I’ve ever seen.”
“Shame on [Newsom] and his government,” Schneider said.
“The most basic level of loving your neighbor as yourself is not killing your neighbor, yet that’s exactly what abortion does.”
“This is satanic,” tweeted Ryan Hilderbrand, a Roman Catholic priest from Indiana.
“Imagining the devil in his advertising office at the top of the highest skyscraper in hell giggling to himself as [Newsom] uses Jesus’ own words to support killing babies,” said Catholic Answers, a Catholic media ministry that went on in a nine-tweet thread to excoriate the Democrat governor for having “twisted” the words of the Bible.
Explaining how the verse Newsom cited was removed from the context of Jesus affirming the Old Testament command “to love the Lord your God with all your heart” as “the greatest commandment,” Catholic Answers tweeted, “No surprise here.”
“Satan, having no imagination, can only ‘create’ by perverting the good not of his making.”
“Likewise, it seems, for Gavin Newsom.”
“Wow …”
“So murdering your innocent unborn child is somehow ‘loving your neighbor,’” tweeted The Christian Outlook, a Christian media outlet.
“Let’s all pray for [Newsom], that he might get saved and see the value God places on every life, born and unborn.”
“Your religious beliefs have no place in our politics.”
“Except when we want to use them to troll people we hate, that’s fine,” tweeted canon lawyer Ed Condon, who also founded Catholic publication “The Pillar.”
“‘Good Catholic’ [Newsom] is now using Bible scriptures to encourage women to come to California to abort their babies,” wrote David Giglio, a former congressional candidate who is also a Catholic.
“A truly shameful display.”
“Meanwhile, in CA crime continues to skyrocket, the cost of living is out of control, and the state can’t even keep the lights on.”
The official Twitter account of the Mississippi GOP replied to Newsom’s taunt by tweeting simply: “Hey, [Newsom]. Is your electricity back on?”
Newsom’s campaign did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment by time of publication.
end quotes
And in the meantime, while that is all going on, we head over to the Washington Examiner for the other, far more serious side to this story of Joe Biden and the Democrats putting the full protection of the law over on the abortionists and baby killers, while at the same time, stripping those of us who do not believe like Joe Biden that killing unborn babies is the right thing to do, to a story titled “The Biden administration has launched its war on pro-lifers” by Timothy P. Carney on 26 September 2022, where we have the reality those of us who are not like Joe Biden PRO-ABORTION face, to wit:
The FBI on Friday morning arrested a pro-life activist at his home for a 2021 scuffle with a Planned Parenthood activist.
The family and friends of Mark Houck said the scuffle involved an abortion activist harassing and screaming at Houck’s 12-year-old son until Houck shoved the man to the ground.
In response, Houck’s family and friends have told reporters, the FBI this weekend sent a platoon of agents with weapons drawn to arrest Houck at his house.
Even if you take only the FBI’s version of the tale, the Biden administration assembled a grand jury, secured an indictment, and charged a man with a federal crime possibly carrying an 11-year sentence because he shoved another man who received “injuries … that required medical attention.”
Because there is an extraordinary federal law protecting abortionists from protesters, sidewalk counselors, and rosary prayers, Houck is now charged with a federal felony.
This only makes sense in a political context.
Specifically, the Biden White House and the Democratic Party on the state and federal levels have declared a legal war on pro-lifers, while vigilante abortion defenders wage a parallel war of arson, vandalism, and harassment.
The vice president, who has said she approaches abortion policy like “a prosecutor,” is siccing state attorneys general on the nonprofit organizations that serve mothers in crisis pregnancies because those nonprofit organizations don’t abort the babies that come through their doors.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has said she wants crisis pregnancy centers “shut down.”
That was the same day a crisis pregnancy center outside of Detroit was attacked for the second time, with death threats spray-painted.
More than 70 such attacks have happened in the past few months, and the Biden administration has said and done nothing about it.
It’s as if they’re fine with the threats, arson, and vandalism.
end quotes
And you know what, people – THEY ARE!
So will I have a platoon of FBI agents now coming after me with drawn guns for speaking out in here?
Will they have a heavily-armed SWAT team coming after Wayne Creed for even daring to host a discussion like this that is critical of Joe Biden’s stance on abortion?
Stay tuned is all I can say.
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
FOX NEWS
"Harris ripped for gaffe touting US ‘alliance with Republic of North Korea’: Kim Jong Un ‘is laughing at us'"
Gabriel Hays
29 SEPTEMBER 2022
Twitter users blasted Vice President Kamala Harris for her recent gaffe in which she claimed the U.S. has an "alliance with the Republic of North Korea."
Harris made the blunder while visiting the Demilitarized Zone between South Korea, the actual U.S. ally on the peninsula, and the People’s Republic of North Korea, the rogue state run by dictator Kim Jong Un.
The U.S. is still technically at war with North Korea as the Korean War ended with an armistice rather than a peace treaty in 1953.
While making a speech at the DMZ this week, Harris stated, "So the United States shares a very important relationship, which is an alliance with the Republic of North Korea and it is an alliance that is strong an enduring."
The blatantly obvious error caught the attention of Harris’ critics online, who weren’t willing to look the other way.
Conservative commentator John Cardillo lambasted the Biden administration after seeing this clip, tweeting, "Let's just keep making believe these morons are remotely functional and not complete idiots."
Former Trump 2020 press communications director Erin Perrine also slammed Harris within the context of Biden’s "Where’s Jackie?" gaffe from yesterday.
She wrote, "It is very obvious the VP misspoke here but it leads to a serious question, will the White House admit the mistake or double down like they did yesterday when it was clear Biden messed up big time calling out for a dead member of Congress?"
Podcast host Monica Crowley tweeted, "Please tell me this is a deep fake."
GOP communications expert Matt Whitlock tweeted, "Between this and Biden’s chaotic Taiwan rhetoric and cleanup we are sending some very mixed signals into Asia."
"The only thing they’re likely clear about is that the Biden administration is a hot mess."
Hot Air managing editor Ed Morrisey mocked Harris by way of White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s widely rebuked defense of Biden’s "Where’s Jackie?" gaffe.
He wrote, "I can't wait for @PressSec's explanations of how South Korea was ‘top of mind’ for Harris in this moment."
Journalist Ian Miles Cheong remarked, "Kamala Harris says the US is now in an alliance with North Korea."
"South Korea fall out of favor or something?"
Toronto Sun political columnist Brian Lilley torched the Vice President, writing, "If the Dems decide Biden isn’t their guy in 2024, they won’t be looking to Kamala Harris as the candidate."
"This is something straight out of an episode of Veep - praising the U.S. alliance with North Korea?"
Republican California state senator Melissa Menendez asked, "Aside from the obvious blunder here, why can she go to the DMZ but not the border here in our own country?"
And Townhall.com web editor Rebecca Downs wrote, "Kim Jong Un is laughing SO hard at us right now."
"Who thought it was a good idea to send her?"
"They were probably already laughing at us then too."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ha ... 79899c7b0b
"Harris ripped for gaffe touting US ‘alliance with Republic of North Korea’: Kim Jong Un ‘is laughing at us'"
Gabriel Hays
29 SEPTEMBER 2022
Twitter users blasted Vice President Kamala Harris for her recent gaffe in which she claimed the U.S. has an "alliance with the Republic of North Korea."
Harris made the blunder while visiting the Demilitarized Zone between South Korea, the actual U.S. ally on the peninsula, and the People’s Republic of North Korea, the rogue state run by dictator Kim Jong Un.
The U.S. is still technically at war with North Korea as the Korean War ended with an armistice rather than a peace treaty in 1953.
While making a speech at the DMZ this week, Harris stated, "So the United States shares a very important relationship, which is an alliance with the Republic of North Korea and it is an alliance that is strong an enduring."
The blatantly obvious error caught the attention of Harris’ critics online, who weren’t willing to look the other way.
Conservative commentator John Cardillo lambasted the Biden administration after seeing this clip, tweeting, "Let's just keep making believe these morons are remotely functional and not complete idiots."
Former Trump 2020 press communications director Erin Perrine also slammed Harris within the context of Biden’s "Where’s Jackie?" gaffe from yesterday.
She wrote, "It is very obvious the VP misspoke here but it leads to a serious question, will the White House admit the mistake or double down like they did yesterday when it was clear Biden messed up big time calling out for a dead member of Congress?"
Podcast host Monica Crowley tweeted, "Please tell me this is a deep fake."
GOP communications expert Matt Whitlock tweeted, "Between this and Biden’s chaotic Taiwan rhetoric and cleanup we are sending some very mixed signals into Asia."
"The only thing they’re likely clear about is that the Biden administration is a hot mess."
Hot Air managing editor Ed Morrisey mocked Harris by way of White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s widely rebuked defense of Biden’s "Where’s Jackie?" gaffe.
He wrote, "I can't wait for @PressSec's explanations of how South Korea was ‘top of mind’ for Harris in this moment."
Journalist Ian Miles Cheong remarked, "Kamala Harris says the US is now in an alliance with North Korea."
"South Korea fall out of favor or something?"
Toronto Sun political columnist Brian Lilley torched the Vice President, writing, "If the Dems decide Biden isn’t their guy in 2024, they won’t be looking to Kamala Harris as the candidate."
"This is something straight out of an episode of Veep - praising the U.S. alliance with North Korea?"
Republican California state senator Melissa Menendez asked, "Aside from the obvious blunder here, why can she go to the DMZ but not the border here in our own country?"
And Townhall.com web editor Rebecca Downs wrote, "Kim Jong Un is laughing SO hard at us right now."
"Who thought it was a good idea to send her?"
"They were probably already laughing at us then too."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ha ... 79899c7b0b
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE HILL
"The Pagan roots of Democrats’ abortion extremism"
Opinion by Graedon Zorzi, Opinion Contributor
1 OCTOBER 2022
Arizona’s recent ruling on abortion will set women “back more than a century,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claimed last week.
But it’s the Democrats who are trying to turn the clock back on abortion.
Democrats, including President Biden, are quickly moving toward the extreme position that a woman alone can, in consultation with her doctor, make any decision at any time on abortion.
That position would set women back all the way to the first century, a brutal age that ended only when the Christian era brought new protections for infants before and after birth.
Jean-Pierre’s comments followed a ruling in Arizona that reinstated a law banning abortions except in cases when the mother’s life is in jeopardy.
Arizona passed the law in 1864 and reenacted it several times, most recently in 1977.
Arizona’s law includes prison sentences for those who help women get abortions.
After the law was reinstated by Judge Kellie Johnson on Friday afternoon, the president of Planned Parenthood Arizona, Brittany Fonteno, responded, saying, “No archaic law should dictate our reproductive freedom.”
But Democrats’ position on abortion is the archaic one.
Abortion is an archaic practice.
In Pagan Rome, abortion was commonplace, performed by a variety of surgical and medicinal methods and taken for granted by philosophers.
Plato, for example, laid out in Book V of the “Republic” various regulations for what offspring should be conceived and prescribed abortion for any infants conceived outside of those regulations, including by women older than 40 and men older than 55.
The ancient Pagans largely accepted infanticide as well, and the exposure of infants was common.
The Greek father had an absolute right to expose his children.
Exposure of infants, especially girls, was common and often linked to economic concerns about raising too many children.
But even in large families “more than one daughter was practically never reared.”
Termination of female infants was so common as to contribute to a dramatically skewed sex ratio, estimated at “131 males per 100 females in the city of Rome, and 140 males per 100 females in Italy, Asia Minor, and North Africa.”
This archaic willingness to dispose of infants fit into a broader callousness toward human life.
As historian Tom Holland put it, the Romans had a “genius for making a show out of death” that showed up in many places, including in the cheering crowds that packed amphitheaters to watch people thrown to animals, forced to fight one another to the death and subjected to cruelly inventive forms of torture.
The standard archaic Pagan position on the value of the lives of infants is reemerging today.
A leading voice has been Princeton professor Peter Singer, who holds that “killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person.”
According to Singer, the normal reason to care about protecting the life of a newborn is not because of some intrinsic value in the baby itself but because “most infants are loved and cherished by their parents.”
Mainstream Democrats are not quite ready to align with Singer in fully embracing the ancient Pagan disregard for the intrinsic worth of infants.
But Democrats are becoming gradually bolder in championing the notion that infants matter only when they are wanted by an adult.
Perhaps that notion is captured by the slogan – “my body, my choice” – chanted by protestors in Arizona Friday night.
With Roe v. Wade overturned, Democratic politicians seem to be working out in real time how extreme a position on abortion can be politically viable.
Stacey Abrams, hoping to make abortion a central issue in her Georgia gubernatorial race, previously rejected limits on abortion and advocated leaving the decision up to the mother and doctor.
Now she has hedged that position by suggesting that the right to abortion ends at the point of viability except in order to protect the woman’s “life or health” — leaving open a significant question about the “scope or meaning of the health exception.”
A similar caginess can be seen in the Women’s Health and Protection Act, recently passed by the House of Representatives.
Without too explicit an embrace of late-term abortions, that bill would nevertheless have made it very difficult to limit abortions up to the point of birth.
The approach to abortion codified in the recently reinstated Arizona law represents the newer position, historically speaking: to find intrinsic value in the life of the infant.
Christians adopted the Jewish rejection of all forms of abortion and infanticide.
That rejection of the killing of infants was as offensive to ancient Pagans as it is to many Americans today.
The Roman historian and politician Tacitus called the Jewish teaching that it was “a deadly sin to kill an unwanted child” one of their “sinister and revolting” practices.
From its earliest days, the Christian church rejected abortion and infanticide based on recognition of the intrinsic value of infants, even while speculating about how body and soul intersect in the womb.
The oldest extant Christian catechism, “the Didache,” written right around the end of the first century, commanded, “thou shalt not kill a child by abortion, neither shalt thou slay it when born.”
And the “Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus,” one of the earliest extant works of Christian apologetics, explained what “distinguished” Christians “from other men” by saying, “they beget children; but they do not destroy their offspring.”
The victory of the Jewish-Christian position over the Pagan was so lasting as to lead to Arizona’s 1864 law as well as the 1977 reenactment of it.
The caustic responses to Judge Johnson’s Friday decision recall Tacitus’s disgust with the teaching that killing an “unwanted child” is “a deadly sin.”
Jean-Pierre’s statement on the ruling claims that its potential consequences are “catastrophic, dangerous and unacceptable.”
Such strong reactions signal political will to undo centuries of moral progress.
Graedon Zorzi is assistant professor of theology and philosophy at Patrick Henry College. He holds a PhD from Yale University in political science and religious studies. He is an ordained Anglican priest.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 6c8f784afd
"The Pagan roots of Democrats’ abortion extremism"
Opinion by Graedon Zorzi, Opinion Contributor
1 OCTOBER 2022
Arizona’s recent ruling on abortion will set women “back more than a century,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claimed last week.
But it’s the Democrats who are trying to turn the clock back on abortion.
Democrats, including President Biden, are quickly moving toward the extreme position that a woman alone can, in consultation with her doctor, make any decision at any time on abortion.
That position would set women back all the way to the first century, a brutal age that ended only when the Christian era brought new protections for infants before and after birth.
Jean-Pierre’s comments followed a ruling in Arizona that reinstated a law banning abortions except in cases when the mother’s life is in jeopardy.
Arizona passed the law in 1864 and reenacted it several times, most recently in 1977.
Arizona’s law includes prison sentences for those who help women get abortions.
After the law was reinstated by Judge Kellie Johnson on Friday afternoon, the president of Planned Parenthood Arizona, Brittany Fonteno, responded, saying, “No archaic law should dictate our reproductive freedom.”
But Democrats’ position on abortion is the archaic one.
Abortion is an archaic practice.
In Pagan Rome, abortion was commonplace, performed by a variety of surgical and medicinal methods and taken for granted by philosophers.
Plato, for example, laid out in Book V of the “Republic” various regulations for what offspring should be conceived and prescribed abortion for any infants conceived outside of those regulations, including by women older than 40 and men older than 55.
The ancient Pagans largely accepted infanticide as well, and the exposure of infants was common.
The Greek father had an absolute right to expose his children.
Exposure of infants, especially girls, was common and often linked to economic concerns about raising too many children.
But even in large families “more than one daughter was practically never reared.”
Termination of female infants was so common as to contribute to a dramatically skewed sex ratio, estimated at “131 males per 100 females in the city of Rome, and 140 males per 100 females in Italy, Asia Minor, and North Africa.”
This archaic willingness to dispose of infants fit into a broader callousness toward human life.
As historian Tom Holland put it, the Romans had a “genius for making a show out of death” that showed up in many places, including in the cheering crowds that packed amphitheaters to watch people thrown to animals, forced to fight one another to the death and subjected to cruelly inventive forms of torture.
The standard archaic Pagan position on the value of the lives of infants is reemerging today.
A leading voice has been Princeton professor Peter Singer, who holds that “killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person.”
According to Singer, the normal reason to care about protecting the life of a newborn is not because of some intrinsic value in the baby itself but because “most infants are loved and cherished by their parents.”
Mainstream Democrats are not quite ready to align with Singer in fully embracing the ancient Pagan disregard for the intrinsic worth of infants.
But Democrats are becoming gradually bolder in championing the notion that infants matter only when they are wanted by an adult.
Perhaps that notion is captured by the slogan – “my body, my choice” – chanted by protestors in Arizona Friday night.
With Roe v. Wade overturned, Democratic politicians seem to be working out in real time how extreme a position on abortion can be politically viable.
Stacey Abrams, hoping to make abortion a central issue in her Georgia gubernatorial race, previously rejected limits on abortion and advocated leaving the decision up to the mother and doctor.
Now she has hedged that position by suggesting that the right to abortion ends at the point of viability except in order to protect the woman’s “life or health” — leaving open a significant question about the “scope or meaning of the health exception.”
A similar caginess can be seen in the Women’s Health and Protection Act, recently passed by the House of Representatives.
Without too explicit an embrace of late-term abortions, that bill would nevertheless have made it very difficult to limit abortions up to the point of birth.
The approach to abortion codified in the recently reinstated Arizona law represents the newer position, historically speaking: to find intrinsic value in the life of the infant.
Christians adopted the Jewish rejection of all forms of abortion and infanticide.
That rejection of the killing of infants was as offensive to ancient Pagans as it is to many Americans today.
The Roman historian and politician Tacitus called the Jewish teaching that it was “a deadly sin to kill an unwanted child” one of their “sinister and revolting” practices.
From its earliest days, the Christian church rejected abortion and infanticide based on recognition of the intrinsic value of infants, even while speculating about how body and soul intersect in the womb.
The oldest extant Christian catechism, “the Didache,” written right around the end of the first century, commanded, “thou shalt not kill a child by abortion, neither shalt thou slay it when born.”
And the “Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus,” one of the earliest extant works of Christian apologetics, explained what “distinguished” Christians “from other men” by saying, “they beget children; but they do not destroy their offspring.”
The victory of the Jewish-Christian position over the Pagan was so lasting as to lead to Arizona’s 1864 law as well as the 1977 reenactment of it.
The caustic responses to Judge Johnson’s Friday decision recall Tacitus’s disgust with the teaching that killing an “unwanted child” is “a deadly sin.”
Jean-Pierre’s statement on the ruling claims that its potential consequences are “catastrophic, dangerous and unacceptable.”
Such strong reactions signal political will to undo centuries of moral progress.
Graedon Zorzi is assistant professor of theology and philosophy at Patrick Henry College. He holds a PhD from Yale University in political science and religious studies. He is an ordained Anglican priest.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 6c8f784afd
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 2, 2022 AT 10:12 PM
Paul Plante says:
IX. No, Joe, the right-wingers and MAGA Republicans did not get Roe v. Wade overturned, and it is very stupid to say they did.
To see exactly what I am talking about here, let’s go to a USA TODAY article titled “Remind me why the Biden administration is in court fighting publication of the ERA?” by Carli Pierson, a New York licensed attorney and an opinion writer with USA TODAY and a member of the USA TODAY Editorial Board, on 1 October 2022, where we have this very stupid and ridiculous statement from her to consider, to wit:
Now, lawmakers and right-wing organizations are pushing back against the ERA because they worry that, if published, it would again consecrate women’s rights to abortion care after they got Roe v. Wade overturned.
end quotes
Lawmakers and right-wing organizations were the ones who got Roe v. Wade overturned?
That’s daft, people, and it serves to demonstrate just how stupid this New York licensed attorney really is, and how ignorant of how the law works in this country she really is, because right-wing organizations had absolutely nothing to do with getting Roe v. Wade overruled.
And according to the Court, Roe v. Wade was overruled because it was BAD LAW and a case of JUDICIAL OVERREACH, but that is a totally separate matter.
Had not someone with actual standing to sue filed the lawsuit in the first place, Roe v. Wade never would have been challenged, or overruled, because despite this toxic and misleading rhetoric about MAGA Republicans stealing an alleged “Constitutional right” from women that they never had in the first place, MAGA Republicans had no standing to bring the matter before the Supreme Court, NOR DID THEY.
Roe v. Wade was overruled because of the state of Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act, which act provides that “except in a medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform . . . or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks.”
The lawsuit that resulted in Roe V. Wade was not brought by MAGA Republicans or other right-wingers to challenge that act.
The challenge to the act was made by the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, an abortion clinic, and one of its doctors, who challenged the Act in Federal District Court, alleging that it violated this Court’s precedents establishing a constitutional right to abortion, in particular Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833.
They did that, made that court challenge, of their own volition.
No MAGA Republican or other right winger held a gun to their heads and made them file a losing lawsuit so the MAGA Republicans could steal an alleged Constitutional right from women in order to give the Democrats an emotional issue to make hay of going into the November 2022 mid-terms.
And when that lawsuit was filed, it went not to the Supreme Court, but to a District Court which granted summary judgment in favor of respondents and permanently enjoined enforcement of the Act, reasoning that Mississippi’s 15-week restriction on abortion violates this Court’s cases forbidding States to ban abortion pre-viability.
So that is where this whole thing began, and it had nothing to do with MAGA Republicans, at all.
That is one of Joe Biden’s toxic great big lies we are confronting in here, courtesy of the Cape Charles Mirror, as we head into November, where the fate of OUR Republic and OUR Constitution are going to be determined one way, or the other.
Going back to the lawsuit, after the decision by the District Court, it next went to the Fifth Circuit, which affirmed the District Court ruling.
Only then did it finally move to the Supreme Court, and before the Supreme Court, the petitioners, those who were originally sued, defended the Act on the grounds that Roe and Casey were wrongly decided and that the Act is constitutional because it satisfies rational-basis review.
NOWHERE ARE MAGA REPUBLICANS INVOLVED IN ANY OF THAT, AND IT IS BULL**** FOR JOE BIDEN OR ANYONE ELSE TO SAY THEY WERE!
And what was the result of all that?
Held: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.
In other words, people it was DEMOCRACY that prevailed, not MAGA Republicans.
The decision says nothing about MAGA Republicans having any role to play here.
Its language is very specific, to wit:
THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE ABORTION IS RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE AND THER ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES!
So stop lying to us, Joe Biden and the Democrats, by telling us otherwise.
The authority to regulate abortion was not handed over to MAGA Republicans or any other right wing group.
That authority was returned to WE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and OUR elected representatives.
So don’t be fooled, people, by these GREAT BIG TOXIC BIDEN LIES.
Be better than that for the sake of the nation and our collective future.
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Paul Plante says:
IX. No, Joe, the right-wingers and MAGA Republicans did not get Roe v. Wade overturned, and it is very stupid to say they did.
To see exactly what I am talking about here, let’s go to a USA TODAY article titled “Remind me why the Biden administration is in court fighting publication of the ERA?” by Carli Pierson, a New York licensed attorney and an opinion writer with USA TODAY and a member of the USA TODAY Editorial Board, on 1 October 2022, where we have this very stupid and ridiculous statement from her to consider, to wit:
Now, lawmakers and right-wing organizations are pushing back against the ERA because they worry that, if published, it would again consecrate women’s rights to abortion care after they got Roe v. Wade overturned.
end quotes
Lawmakers and right-wing organizations were the ones who got Roe v. Wade overturned?
That’s daft, people, and it serves to demonstrate just how stupid this New York licensed attorney really is, and how ignorant of how the law works in this country she really is, because right-wing organizations had absolutely nothing to do with getting Roe v. Wade overruled.
And according to the Court, Roe v. Wade was overruled because it was BAD LAW and a case of JUDICIAL OVERREACH, but that is a totally separate matter.
Had not someone with actual standing to sue filed the lawsuit in the first place, Roe v. Wade never would have been challenged, or overruled, because despite this toxic and misleading rhetoric about MAGA Republicans stealing an alleged “Constitutional right” from women that they never had in the first place, MAGA Republicans had no standing to bring the matter before the Supreme Court, NOR DID THEY.
Roe v. Wade was overruled because of the state of Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act, which act provides that “except in a medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform . . . or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks.”
The lawsuit that resulted in Roe V. Wade was not brought by MAGA Republicans or other right-wingers to challenge that act.
The challenge to the act was made by the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, an abortion clinic, and one of its doctors, who challenged the Act in Federal District Court, alleging that it violated this Court’s precedents establishing a constitutional right to abortion, in particular Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833.
They did that, made that court challenge, of their own volition.
No MAGA Republican or other right winger held a gun to their heads and made them file a losing lawsuit so the MAGA Republicans could steal an alleged Constitutional right from women in order to give the Democrats an emotional issue to make hay of going into the November 2022 mid-terms.
And when that lawsuit was filed, it went not to the Supreme Court, but to a District Court which granted summary judgment in favor of respondents and permanently enjoined enforcement of the Act, reasoning that Mississippi’s 15-week restriction on abortion violates this Court’s cases forbidding States to ban abortion pre-viability.
So that is where this whole thing began, and it had nothing to do with MAGA Republicans, at all.
That is one of Joe Biden’s toxic great big lies we are confronting in here, courtesy of the Cape Charles Mirror, as we head into November, where the fate of OUR Republic and OUR Constitution are going to be determined one way, or the other.
Going back to the lawsuit, after the decision by the District Court, it next went to the Fifth Circuit, which affirmed the District Court ruling.
Only then did it finally move to the Supreme Court, and before the Supreme Court, the petitioners, those who were originally sued, defended the Act on the grounds that Roe and Casey were wrongly decided and that the Act is constitutional because it satisfies rational-basis review.
NOWHERE ARE MAGA REPUBLICANS INVOLVED IN ANY OF THAT, AND IT IS BULL**** FOR JOE BIDEN OR ANYONE ELSE TO SAY THEY WERE!
And what was the result of all that?
Held: The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.
In other words, people it was DEMOCRACY that prevailed, not MAGA Republicans.
The decision says nothing about MAGA Republicans having any role to play here.
Its language is very specific, to wit:
THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE ABORTION IS RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE AND THER ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES!
So stop lying to us, Joe Biden and the Democrats, by telling us otherwise.
The authority to regulate abortion was not handed over to MAGA Republicans or any other right wing group.
That authority was returned to WE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE and OUR elected representatives.
So don’t be fooled, people, by these GREAT BIG TOXIC BIDEN LIES.
Be better than that for the sake of the nation and our collective future.
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 3, 2022 AT 8:10 PM
Paul Plante says:
X. The abortion lies of Joe Biden and the Democrats are just plain stupid, uninformed and ignorant.
Yes, people, take the Reuters article “Biden suggests support for filibuster change to legalize abortion,” for example, on September 23, 2022, where we have as follows:
WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) – President Joe Biden challenged Democratic voters on Friday that if they elect at least two more senators in November elections, it would open the possibility of Democrats removing the filibuster and restoring federal abortion rights for women.
end quotes
Focus on that phrase “restoring federal abortion rights for women,” because that is just plain stupid talk from Joe Biden, as women in America have no federal abortion rights that Joe Biden and his pack of lying Democrats can restore, and as an American citizen, I personally am damn sick and tired of living in a nation where all we can count on, besides incompetence and inefficiency, is getting lied to repeatedly by our “national leaders,” so thanks to the Grand Palladium of Liberty the Cape Charles Mirror, I am speaking out about those lies as an act of citizenship, which takes us back to that article for more of Joe Biden’s idiotic abortion lies, as follows:
Biden has made restoring protections lost in the Supreme Court’s June decision to reverse the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case a central theme of his stump speeches in the lead-up to the Nov. 8 congressional elections.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” said Biden.
end quotes
With that moronic statement from Joe that “I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” I am very willing to bet that Joe Biden has never once actually read Roe v. Wade, and I am further willing to bet that Joe Biden has no clue as to what Roe v. Wade actually does say, nor do the people who listen to him and believe him when he says he is going to “once again make Roe the law of the land,” because if Joe Biden and the Democrats did “codify” Roe V. Wade, what they would be making “law of the land,” is as follows. because here is what Roe v. Wade actually did say about this supposed “right to choose” way back in 1973, to wit:
* Though the State cannot override that right (right to a QUALIFIED ABORTION), it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman’s health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a ‘compelling’ point at various stages of the woman’s approach to term.
* For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation MUST be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.
* For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, MAY, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are REASONABLY RELATED to maternal health.
* For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, MAY, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.
* The State may define the term ‘physician’ to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined.
end quotes
That, people, is what Roe v. Wade actually does say, so if Joe Biden is going to “codify” it, then he and the Democrats are stuck with what Mr. Chief Justice Burger stated in plain and simple language that even a dull-wit like Joe Biden should have been able to comprehend and understand in concurring in Roe v. Wade, as follows:
Plainly, the Court today rejects any claim that the Constitution requires abortions on demand.
end quotes
And goofy old Joe Biden, himself a lawyer, is trying to tell the women of America otherwise, which takes us back to that story, as follows:
Biden exhorted women voters to help elect Democrats.
end quotes
And good luck there, Joe, because if we go to the Quinnipiac Poll site for July 20, 2022, we find an article titled “Biden Approval Hits New Low Amid Public Discontent With Both Parties, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Nearly Half Of Americans Worry About Being Mass Shooting Victim” where we have the priorities of the American voters listed for the up-coming mid-terms, as follows:
Asked to choose the most urgent issue facing the country today, inflation (34 percent) ranks first followed by gun violence (12 percent).
No other issue reached double digits.
Among Republicans, inflation (48 percent) ranks first followed by immigration (16 percent) with no other issue reaching double digits.
Among Democrats, gun violence (22 percent) ranks first followed by abortion (14 percent), inflation (14 percent), election laws (12 percent), and climate change (11 percent).
Among independents, inflation (41 percent) ranks first with no other issue reaching double digits.
Two-thirds of Americans (67 percent) say the country is worse off today than it was a year ago, while 26 percent say the country is better off and 4 percent volunteer that it is the same.
end quotes
So while Joe Biden and the Democrats seem to feel that running on “codifying” Roe v. Wade is a winning issue, the reality seems far different when we look at actual polling data.
Yes, among some Democrats, it is, but even so, that is only 14%, which takes us back to Reuters for more, as follows:
“I don’t believe the MAGA Republican have a clue about the power of American women.”
“Let me tell you something, they’re about to find out.”
end quotes
And you have to pardon Joe here, people, because he is so obsessed with “MAGA Republicans,” a stupid term he made up that means nothing, that he now has “MAGA Republicans” on top of his mind, as his MINISTER OF STATE PROPAGANDA Karine Jean-Pierre calls it, and they haunt his every thought to the point of where he spends his nights dreaming about them, and how to get his revenge against them, if it is the last thing he does.
And quite personally, I don’t believe that Joe Biden and his pack of Democrats have a clue about the power of American women, because there are actually women in America, as hard as it is to believe today in this day and age of loose morals, no values and the “GET RID OF THE NUISANCE BEFORE YOU HAVE TO CHANGE ITS DIAPERS AND GIVE UP YOUR LIFESTYLE” culture that now exists all across America, and especially places like Hollywood, who are against abortion as a means of ridding oneself of a burden or nuisance, and they do vote and they vote AGAINST those politicians like Joe Biden and his Democrats who are for abortion convenience stores where you can walk in, get rid of the nuisance on demand, and be back on the street partying tonight.
So it is going to be an interesting next few weeks as we head towards November and the future of our nation, and in the meantime, with the courtesy of the Cape Charles Mirror, I am going to keep debunking these toxic Biden administration GREAT BIG WHOPPER LIES, so next up will be Joe’s executive deputy autocrat Karmela Harris whining about abortion on Meet the Press with Chuck Todd on September 11, 2022, so please, stay tuned!
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Paul Plante says:
X. The abortion lies of Joe Biden and the Democrats are just plain stupid, uninformed and ignorant.
Yes, people, take the Reuters article “Biden suggests support for filibuster change to legalize abortion,” for example, on September 23, 2022, where we have as follows:
WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) – President Joe Biden challenged Democratic voters on Friday that if they elect at least two more senators in November elections, it would open the possibility of Democrats removing the filibuster and restoring federal abortion rights for women.
end quotes
Focus on that phrase “restoring federal abortion rights for women,” because that is just plain stupid talk from Joe Biden, as women in America have no federal abortion rights that Joe Biden and his pack of lying Democrats can restore, and as an American citizen, I personally am damn sick and tired of living in a nation where all we can count on, besides incompetence and inefficiency, is getting lied to repeatedly by our “national leaders,” so thanks to the Grand Palladium of Liberty the Cape Charles Mirror, I am speaking out about those lies as an act of citizenship, which takes us back to that article for more of Joe Biden’s idiotic abortion lies, as follows:
Biden has made restoring protections lost in the Supreme Court’s June decision to reverse the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case a central theme of his stump speeches in the lead-up to the Nov. 8 congressional elections.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” said Biden.
end quotes
With that moronic statement from Joe that “I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” I am very willing to bet that Joe Biden has never once actually read Roe v. Wade, and I am further willing to bet that Joe Biden has no clue as to what Roe v. Wade actually does say, nor do the people who listen to him and believe him when he says he is going to “once again make Roe the law of the land,” because if Joe Biden and the Democrats did “codify” Roe V. Wade, what they would be making “law of the land,” is as follows. because here is what Roe v. Wade actually did say about this supposed “right to choose” way back in 1973, to wit:
* Though the State cannot override that right (right to a QUALIFIED ABORTION), it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman’s health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a ‘compelling’ point at various stages of the woman’s approach to term.
* For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation MUST be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.
* For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, MAY, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are REASONABLY RELATED to maternal health.
* For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, MAY, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.
* The State may define the term ‘physician’ to mean only a physician currently licensed by the State, and may proscribe any abortion by a person who is not a physician as so defined.
end quotes
That, people, is what Roe v. Wade actually does say, so if Joe Biden is going to “codify” it, then he and the Democrats are stuck with what Mr. Chief Justice Burger stated in plain and simple language that even a dull-wit like Joe Biden should have been able to comprehend and understand in concurring in Roe v. Wade, as follows:
Plainly, the Court today rejects any claim that the Constitution requires abortions on demand.
end quotes
And goofy old Joe Biden, himself a lawyer, is trying to tell the women of America otherwise, which takes us back to that story, as follows:
Biden exhorted women voters to help elect Democrats.
end quotes
And good luck there, Joe, because if we go to the Quinnipiac Poll site for July 20, 2022, we find an article titled “Biden Approval Hits New Low Amid Public Discontent With Both Parties, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Nearly Half Of Americans Worry About Being Mass Shooting Victim” where we have the priorities of the American voters listed for the up-coming mid-terms, as follows:
Asked to choose the most urgent issue facing the country today, inflation (34 percent) ranks first followed by gun violence (12 percent).
No other issue reached double digits.
Among Republicans, inflation (48 percent) ranks first followed by immigration (16 percent) with no other issue reaching double digits.
Among Democrats, gun violence (22 percent) ranks first followed by abortion (14 percent), inflation (14 percent), election laws (12 percent), and climate change (11 percent).
Among independents, inflation (41 percent) ranks first with no other issue reaching double digits.
Two-thirds of Americans (67 percent) say the country is worse off today than it was a year ago, while 26 percent say the country is better off and 4 percent volunteer that it is the same.
end quotes
So while Joe Biden and the Democrats seem to feel that running on “codifying” Roe v. Wade is a winning issue, the reality seems far different when we look at actual polling data.
Yes, among some Democrats, it is, but even so, that is only 14%, which takes us back to Reuters for more, as follows:
“I don’t believe the MAGA Republican have a clue about the power of American women.”
“Let me tell you something, they’re about to find out.”
end quotes
And you have to pardon Joe here, people, because he is so obsessed with “MAGA Republicans,” a stupid term he made up that means nothing, that he now has “MAGA Republicans” on top of his mind, as his MINISTER OF STATE PROPAGANDA Karine Jean-Pierre calls it, and they haunt his every thought to the point of where he spends his nights dreaming about them, and how to get his revenge against them, if it is the last thing he does.
And quite personally, I don’t believe that Joe Biden and his pack of Democrats have a clue about the power of American women, because there are actually women in America, as hard as it is to believe today in this day and age of loose morals, no values and the “GET RID OF THE NUISANCE BEFORE YOU HAVE TO CHANGE ITS DIAPERS AND GIVE UP YOUR LIFESTYLE” culture that now exists all across America, and especially places like Hollywood, who are against abortion as a means of ridding oneself of a burden or nuisance, and they do vote and they vote AGAINST those politicians like Joe Biden and his Democrats who are for abortion convenience stores where you can walk in, get rid of the nuisance on demand, and be back on the street partying tonight.
So it is going to be an interesting next few weeks as we head towards November and the future of our nation, and in the meantime, with the courtesy of the Cape Charles Mirror, I am going to keep debunking these toxic Biden administration GREAT BIG WHOPPER LIES, so next up will be Joe’s executive deputy autocrat Karmela Harris whining about abortion on Meet the Press with Chuck Todd on September 11, 2022, so please, stay tuned!
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
"White House clarifies Harris comments about 'equity' and hurricane relief"
Haisten Willis
3 OCTOBER 2022
The White House on Monday clarified comments made by Vice President Kamala Harris about Hurricane Ian, saying her remarks about "equity" do not mean resources won't be equally distributed to all people.
En route to Puerto Rico, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked about Harris's comments and the blowback they generated.
She thanked the reporter for asking the question and giving her a chance to respond.
"That is not what the vice president said," stated Jean-Pierre.
"She was clearly talking about long-term investment, not FEMA aid for hurricane response efforts."
"The vice president and the president have been clear that the federal government has been and will continue to be there for all Americans."
During the Democratic National Committee's Women's Leadership Forum on Friday afternoon, Harris told actress Priyanka Chopra Jonas that when it comes to climate change, it is people in lower-income communities and people of color who are "most impacted by these extreme conditions."
"I know we are all thinking about the families in Florida and Puerto Rico with [Hurricane] Fiona and what we need to do to help them in terms of an immediate response and aid," Harris said.
"We have to address this in a way that is about giving resources based on equity, understanding that we fight for equality, but we also need to fight for equity."
"Understanding not everyone starts out at the same place, and if we want people to be in an equal place, sometimes we have to take into account those disparities," she added.
Harris's comments were quickly rejected by Christina Pushaw, a representative for Gov. Ron DeSantis's (R-FL) reelection campaign.
"This is false."
"@VP's rhetoric is causing undue panic and must be clarified."
"FEMA Individual Assistance is already available to all Floridians impacted by Hurricane Ian, regardless of race or background."
"If you need assistance visit disasterassistance.gov or call 1-800-621-3362," Pushaw tweeted.
But Jean-Pierre said on Monday that Pushaw's interpretation was inaccurate.
"We are committed to quickly getting resources to all communities impacted, period, full stop," she said.
Equity is a concern, Jean-Pierre added, but the goal is to get resources distributed to everyone who needs them.
"We also know that some people, particularly in lower-income communities, have a hard time accessing that help," she said.
"That's why this administration has also made it a priority to remove barriers and ensure that everyone, regardless of their zip code, can access federal resources."
"That's what [Harris] was talking about."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/white ... 86b3cbc1e9
"White House clarifies Harris comments about 'equity' and hurricane relief"
Haisten Willis
3 OCTOBER 2022
The White House on Monday clarified comments made by Vice President Kamala Harris about Hurricane Ian, saying her remarks about "equity" do not mean resources won't be equally distributed to all people.
En route to Puerto Rico, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked about Harris's comments and the blowback they generated.
She thanked the reporter for asking the question and giving her a chance to respond.
"That is not what the vice president said," stated Jean-Pierre.
"She was clearly talking about long-term investment, not FEMA aid for hurricane response efforts."
"The vice president and the president have been clear that the federal government has been and will continue to be there for all Americans."
During the Democratic National Committee's Women's Leadership Forum on Friday afternoon, Harris told actress Priyanka Chopra Jonas that when it comes to climate change, it is people in lower-income communities and people of color who are "most impacted by these extreme conditions."
"I know we are all thinking about the families in Florida and Puerto Rico with [Hurricane] Fiona and what we need to do to help them in terms of an immediate response and aid," Harris said.
"We have to address this in a way that is about giving resources based on equity, understanding that we fight for equality, but we also need to fight for equity."
"Understanding not everyone starts out at the same place, and if we want people to be in an equal place, sometimes we have to take into account those disparities," she added.
Harris's comments were quickly rejected by Christina Pushaw, a representative for Gov. Ron DeSantis's (R-FL) reelection campaign.
"This is false."
"@VP's rhetoric is causing undue panic and must be clarified."
"FEMA Individual Assistance is already available to all Floridians impacted by Hurricane Ian, regardless of race or background."
"If you need assistance visit disasterassistance.gov or call 1-800-621-3362," Pushaw tweeted.
But Jean-Pierre said on Monday that Pushaw's interpretation was inaccurate.
"We are committed to quickly getting resources to all communities impacted, period, full stop," she said.
Equity is a concern, Jean-Pierre added, but the goal is to get resources distributed to everyone who needs them.
"We also know that some people, particularly in lower-income communities, have a hard time accessing that help," she said.
"That's why this administration has also made it a priority to remove barriers and ensure that everyone, regardless of their zip code, can access federal resources."
"That's what [Harris] was talking about."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/white ... 86b3cbc1e9
Re: KAMALA HARRIS
THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 5, 2022 AT 7:23 PM
Paul Plante says:
XI. The abortion lies of Executive Deputy Autocrat Karmela Harris on Meet the Press are even more stupid, uninformed and ignorant than those of Joe Biden, and she is a former prosecutor who should know better.
Yes, people, Joe Biden’s executive deputy autocrat Karmela Harris sounded like the world’s most ignorant person with regard to the subject of abortion on Meet the Press on September 11, 2022, 1:05 PM EDT, where the show started as follows:
CHUCK TODD: This Sunday: My interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.
CHUCK TODD: On the rightward shift of the Supreme Court:
VICE PRES. KAMALA HARRIS: I think this is an activist court.
CHUCK TODD: And its abortion decision:
VICE PRES. KAMALA HARRIS: It is not right that we take a constitutional right from the women of America and deprive them of the ability to make decisions about their own body.
end quotes
And there she is, being real stupid right out of the gate and talking like an idiot, because NO constitutional right was taken from women, and nobody has deprived them of the ability to make decisions about their own body, and as she has previously served as the attorney general of California from 2011 to 2017, she is the one person in the Biden regime who should know better, OR you would be led to believe that, anyway, although these days, the fact that somebody was elected as an attorney general doesn’t mean anything at all.
As to the supposed “constitutional right” which doesn’t exist, and didn’t exist before Dobbs was decided, in concurring in Roe v. Wade, Mr. Chief Justice Burger of the United States Supreme Court stated in plain and simple language that even a slack-wit lawyer like Karmela Harris should have been able to comprehend and understand, presuming that she ever bothered in the first place to exert herself to read it, as follows:
Plainly, the Court today rejects any claim that the Constitution requires abortions on demand.
end quote
And seriously, people, how many years of law school does it require to be able to read and understand what that sentence is saying?
Is the phrase “rejects any claim that the Constitution requires abortions on demand” really that hard to understand or comprehend that a trained lawyer like Karmela Harris would be stumped or mystified or stymied by it, especially where the word “reject” is taken to mean “to refuse to accept, use, or believe something?”
And Dobbs DOES NOT deprive women of the ability to make decisions about their own body, and it is so stupid and tedious of Karmela Harris to state or imply that it does.
First of all, Dobbs only involved the constitutionality of the state of Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act, which act provides as follows:
“[e]xcept in a medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform . . . or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks.”
A PERSON SHALL NOT PERFORM OR INDUCE AN ABORTION AFTER FIFTEEN WEEKS!
Fifteen weeks is roughly THREE MONTHS, or what is known as the first trimester, the earliest phase of pregnancy which starts on the first day of one’s last period and lasts until the end of the 13th week.
So how is that different than what Roe v. Wade provided for?
And the answer is that it is no different at all, as we see from Roe v. Wade, to wit:
For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation MUST be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.
end quote
Dobbs does nothing to change that, because that was never an issue in Dobbs.
The challenge in Dobbs was specifically to Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act.
That challenge was made by the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, an abortion clinic, and one of its doctors.
They challenged the Act in Federal District Court, alleging that it violated this Court’s precedents establishing a constitutional right to abortion, in particular Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833.
And having failed to logically and rationally prove their points in their briefs to the Supreme Court, they lost that argument.
In plain language, Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act was held to NOT VIOLATE Roe v. Wade, or Casey.
Those people, are the facts.
If you don’t believe me, read the cases for yourself, and you will see those same words, given that I cut and pasted them straight from those decisions.
And then ask yourself this important question:
WHY IS KARMELA HARRIS TELLING US THESE EGREGIOUS LIES JUST BEFORE THE NOVEMBER MID-TERMS?
MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHY IS KARMELA HARRIS LYING TO US ABOUT ANTHING, AND ESPECIALLY SUCH AN EMOTIONAL SUBJECT AS ABORTION?
Think about it, people, while there is still time!
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond
Paul Plante says:
XI. The abortion lies of Executive Deputy Autocrat Karmela Harris on Meet the Press are even more stupid, uninformed and ignorant than those of Joe Biden, and she is a former prosecutor who should know better.
Yes, people, Joe Biden’s executive deputy autocrat Karmela Harris sounded like the world’s most ignorant person with regard to the subject of abortion on Meet the Press on September 11, 2022, 1:05 PM EDT, where the show started as follows:
CHUCK TODD: This Sunday: My interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.
CHUCK TODD: On the rightward shift of the Supreme Court:
VICE PRES. KAMALA HARRIS: I think this is an activist court.
CHUCK TODD: And its abortion decision:
VICE PRES. KAMALA HARRIS: It is not right that we take a constitutional right from the women of America and deprive them of the ability to make decisions about their own body.
end quotes
And there she is, being real stupid right out of the gate and talking like an idiot, because NO constitutional right was taken from women, and nobody has deprived them of the ability to make decisions about their own body, and as she has previously served as the attorney general of California from 2011 to 2017, she is the one person in the Biden regime who should know better, OR you would be led to believe that, anyway, although these days, the fact that somebody was elected as an attorney general doesn’t mean anything at all.
As to the supposed “constitutional right” which doesn’t exist, and didn’t exist before Dobbs was decided, in concurring in Roe v. Wade, Mr. Chief Justice Burger of the United States Supreme Court stated in plain and simple language that even a slack-wit lawyer like Karmela Harris should have been able to comprehend and understand, presuming that she ever bothered in the first place to exert herself to read it, as follows:
Plainly, the Court today rejects any claim that the Constitution requires abortions on demand.
end quote
And seriously, people, how many years of law school does it require to be able to read and understand what that sentence is saying?
Is the phrase “rejects any claim that the Constitution requires abortions on demand” really that hard to understand or comprehend that a trained lawyer like Karmela Harris would be stumped or mystified or stymied by it, especially where the word “reject” is taken to mean “to refuse to accept, use, or believe something?”
And Dobbs DOES NOT deprive women of the ability to make decisions about their own body, and it is so stupid and tedious of Karmela Harris to state or imply that it does.
First of all, Dobbs only involved the constitutionality of the state of Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act, which act provides as follows:
“[e]xcept in a medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform . . . or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks.”
A PERSON SHALL NOT PERFORM OR INDUCE AN ABORTION AFTER FIFTEEN WEEKS!
Fifteen weeks is roughly THREE MONTHS, or what is known as the first trimester, the earliest phase of pregnancy which starts on the first day of one’s last period and lasts until the end of the 13th week.
So how is that different than what Roe v. Wade provided for?
And the answer is that it is no different at all, as we see from Roe v. Wade, to wit:
For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation MUST be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.
end quote
Dobbs does nothing to change that, because that was never an issue in Dobbs.
The challenge in Dobbs was specifically to Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act.
That challenge was made by the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, an abortion clinic, and one of its doctors.
They challenged the Act in Federal District Court, alleging that it violated this Court’s precedents establishing a constitutional right to abortion, in particular Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113, and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833.
And having failed to logically and rationally prove their points in their briefs to the Supreme Court, they lost that argument.
In plain language, Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act was held to NOT VIOLATE Roe v. Wade, or Casey.
Those people, are the facts.
If you don’t believe me, read the cases for yourself, and you will see those same words, given that I cut and pasted them straight from those decisions.
And then ask yourself this important question:
WHY IS KARMELA HARRIS TELLING US THESE EGREGIOUS LIES JUST BEFORE THE NOVEMBER MID-TERMS?
MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHY IS KARMELA HARRIS LYING TO US ABOUT ANTHING, AND ESPECIALLY SUCH AN EMOTIONAL SUBJECT AS ABORTION?
Think about it, people, while there is still time!
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... 13#respond