Just musings, is all

thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 17, 2021 AT 10:54 PM

Paul Plante says:

Bizarre Beyond Belief (BBB), people, is all that can be said for this Biden-esque CIRCUS going on in the putrid swamp of Washington. D.C., a waste of otherwise perfectly good swampland in what was once a part of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and here I am referring to a Washington Post story entitled “Biden says Justice Department should prosecute those who refuse Jan. 6 committee’s subpoenas” by Amy B. Wang on 16 October 2021, where we have the autocrat Joe Biden proving he is an autocrat by acting like an autocrat, to wit:

President Biden said Friday that the Justice Department should prosecute those who defy subpoenas from the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection, the most he has weighed in on possible consequences for aides of former president Donald Trump who have refused to comply with the panel’s demands.

“I hope the committee goes after them and holds them accountable,” Biden told reporters Friday evening, when asked what should happen to those who defy subpoenas from the congressional committee.

end quotes

And you know what, people – I hope the WITCH HUNTERS do go after them with both guns drawn and blazing, because that will strip the WITCH HUNTERS and the autocrat Biden of control, because as soon as these people are charged, it become a matter for the courts, and DUE PROCESS OF LAW then must be afforded to these people, as we see in United States Supreme Court case of John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, to wit:

Nor is the Congress a law enforcement or trial agency.

These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government.

No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of the Congress.

Investigations conducted solely for the personal aggrandizement of the investigators or to ‘punish’ those investigated are indefensible.

It is unquestionably the duty of all citizens to cooperate with the Congress in its efforts to obtain the facts needed for intelligent legislative action.

It is their unremitting obligation to respond to subpoenas, to respect the dignity of the Congress and its committees and to testify fully with respect to matters within the province of proper investigation.

This, of course, assumes that the constitutional rights of witnesses will be respected by the Congress as they are in a court of justice.

The Bill of Rights is applicable to investigations as to all forms of governmental action.

Witnesses cannot be compelled to give evidence against themselves.

They cannot be subjected to unreasonable search and seizure.

Nor can the First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, religion, or political belief and association be abridged.

end quotes

And here we have to go back to the authorizing resolution for the WITCH HUNTERS, which is fatally flawed, to wit:

H.Res.503 – Establishing the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.

117th Congress (2021-2022)

Sponsor: Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-12] (Introduced 06/28/2021)

In the House of Representatives, U. S., June 30, 2021.

Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election and launched an assault on the United States Capitol Complex that resulted in multiple deaths, physical harm to over 140 members of law enforcement, and terror and trauma among staff, institutional employees, press, and Members;

end quotes

WAS THERE AN INSURRECTION ON 6 JANUARY 2021?

And if not, then how can the WITCH HUNTERS compel anyone under threat of being jailed to come in and give testimony about something that never happened?

But let’s leave that for the moment and go back to Joe Biden the autocrat being an autocrat, to wit:

When asked Friday if the Justice Department should prosecute those who refuse the committee’s subpoenas, Biden responded, “I do.”

“Yes.”

end quotes

And this following statement is just wondrous to behold, to wit:

Shortly after Biden’s remarks, the Justice Department tried to distance itself from any implications the White House was influencing decisions there.

“The Department of Justice will make its own independent decisions in all prosecutions based solely on the facts and the law.”

“Period.”

“Full stop,” Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley said in a statement Friday.

end quotes

You go, dude!

And then we had Jen coming on the scene, as well, to wit:

White House press secretary Jen Psaki, too, later sought to clarify Biden’s comments and emphasize the separation between the branches of government.

“As [Biden] has said many times, January 6th was one of the darkest days in our democracy,” Psaki tweeted Friday night.

“He supports the work of the committee and the independent role of the Department of Justice to make any decisions about prosecutions.”

end quotes

Ah, okay, Jen!

And now, we take a break for station identification and a word from our sponsors!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-447344
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 18, 2021 AT 9:04 PM

Paul Plante says:

And while we are on the subject of the fatally flawed authorizing resolution of Democrat Nancy Pelosi forming her “selected” committee of WITCH HUNTERS to create a false narrative, a “BIG LIE,” about what they say happened on 6 January 2021 in order to influence the 2022 Congressional elections in their favor, on the question of due process of law, let’s go to this following judicial language from the United States Supreme Court in the case of John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, to wit:

Since World War II, the Congress has practically abandoned its original practice of utilizing the coercive sanction of contempt proceedings at the bar of the House.

The sanction there imposed is imprisonment by the House until the recalcitrant witness agrees to testify or disclose the matters sought, provided that the incarceration does not extend beyond adjournment.

The Congress has instead invoked the aid of the federal judicial system in protecting itself against contumacious conduct.

It has become customary to refer these matters to the United States Attorneys for prosecution under criminal law.

end quotes

Now, note that language about “refer these matters to the United States Attorneys for prosecution under criminal law.”

When I say, and this is speaking as an American citizen who believes in and supports RULE OF LAW as opposed to RULE OF NANCY or RULE OF JOE, that I hope the WITCH HUNTERS do go after their intended victims with both guns drawn and blazing, because that will strip the WITCH HUNTERS and the autocrat Biden of control, because as soon as these people are charged, it become a matter for the courts, and DUE PROCESS OF LAW then must be afforded to these people, it is that very phrase I am referring to.

When somebody, anybody, is prosecuted pursuant to criminal law, which is what was at issue in John T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, 354 U.S. 178, they are entitled to appeal their conviction, as Watkins did, all the way up to the Supreme Court, a process Nancy Pelosi, her WITCH HUNTERS and Joe Biden have absolutely no control over, nor should they, which takes us back to that case, as follows:

The appropriate statute is found in 2 U.S.C. § 192, 2 U.S.C.A. § 192.

It provides: ‘Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House, or any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or any committee of either House of Congress, willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $100 and imprisonment in a common jail for not less than one month nor more than twelve months.’

end quotes

That is the criminal statute that the Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS are planning to employ against Bannon, and as I say, I hope they do, which takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, to wit:

In fulfillment of their obligation under this statute, the courts must accord to the defendants every right which is guaranteed to defendants in all other criminal cases.

end quotes

BINGO, people – there is where Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and the WITCH HUNTERS lose their control over the narrative they need to create out of whole cloth in order to influence the American people away from the Republicans so the Democrats can further cement their iron grip on our national government as they seek to impose ONE PARTY RULE over us, a FREE PEOPLE who don’t make good Democrat serfs and slaves, at all, which takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, as follows:

Among these is the right to have available, through a sufficiently precise statute, information revealing the standard of criminality before the commission of the alleged offense.

Applied to persons prosecuted under § 192, this raises a special problem in that the statute defines the crime as refusal to answer ‘any question pertinent to the question under inquiry.’

Part of the standard of criminality, therefore, is the pertinency of the questions propounded to the witness.

end quotes

Which takes us back to the Authorizing Resolution, after Nancy stated in her own words, “Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election,” as follows:

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.

There is hereby established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (hereinafter referred to as the “Select Committee”).

end quotes

Ask yourselves, people, this one question: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI KNOW THOSE PEOPLE WERE INSURRECTIONISTS, WHICH IS TO SAY, CRIMINALS, SINCE INSURRECTION IS A SERIOUS FEDERAL CRIME?

AND HOW WOULD STEVE BANNON, OR ANYBODY ELSE, KNOW THOSE PEOPLE WERE INSURRECTIONISTS?

And then ask yourself this one: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI KNOW WHAT ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE FOR THAT DAY?

CAN NANCY PELOSI READ MINDS?

CAN STEVE BANNON READ MINDS?

If not, then how is he, or anybody else, going to tell the WITCH HUNTERS what any of those people were doing there, keeping in mind that one Democrat was arrested wearing a MAGA HAT and posing as a Trump supporter?

And that takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, to wit:

It is obvious that a person compelled to make this choice (to appear or not appear, or answer or not answer) is entitled to have knowledge of the subject to which the interrogation is deemed pertinent.

That knowledge must be available with the same degree of explicitness and clarity that the Due Process Clause requires in the expression of any element of a criminal offense.

end quotes

And there we are back to why this whole Pelosi-ite FARCE is just plain stupid, and why the WITCH HUNTERS along with Nancy Pelosi and the AUTOCRAT Joe Biden are going to lose control of the narrative and the process itself, the moment they refer Bannon for criminal prosecution under 2 U.S.C. § 192.

Getting back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, we have:

The ‘vice of vagueness’ must be avoided here as in all other crimes.

There are several sources that can outline the ‘question under inquiry’ in such a way that the rules against vagueness are satisfied.

The authorizing resolution, the remarks of the chairman or members of the committee, or even the nature of the proceedings themselves, might sometimes make the topic clear.

end quotes

And ask yourselves again, does this authorizing resolution of Nancy Pelosi’s make anything clear, other than the WITCH HUNTERS are to create a narrative for Nancy that will be a BIG LIE with which to influence the 2022 congressional elections?

Which question takes us back to Watkins and the Supreme Court, to wit:

This case demonstrates, however, that these sources often leave the matter in grave doubt.

end quotes

Amen!

And let the games begin!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-447998
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 18, 2021 AT 9:37 PM

Paul Plante says:

Yes, people, Bizarre Beyond Belief, and here I am referring to an article in the Guardian entitled “Capitol attack panel’s message to Steve Bannon: we won’t forget about you” by Richard Luscombe on 17 October 2021, where we have a real good look at just how stupid this whole WITCH HUNTERS saga really is, to wit:

Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republicans on the special committee investigating the deadly 6 January US Capitol attack, said on Sunday the pursuit of a criminal contempt referral against Steve Bannon was “the first shot over the bow” for allies of Donald Trump defying subpoenas to testify.

“It’s very real, but it says to anybody else coming in front of the committee, ‘Don’t think that you’re going to be able to just kind of walk away and we’re going to forget about you’,” Kinzinger, a vocal critic of the former president, told CNN’s State of the Union.

end quotes

Now, seriously, people, what kind of totally ridiculous statement is that?

This idiot Kinzinger sounds like something you would expect to find in a FASCIST COUNTRY, with those ridiculous threats of his, because while the House can indeed refer criminal charges of contempt of Congress to the Justice Department, that is all they can do, so what is with the threat other than to make this WITCH HUNTER Kinzinger sound like a real tough guy?

Getting back to that story, we have:

He added that the committee would not rule out calling Trump himself to testify, though he acknowledged that such a move was not imminent.

end quote

YAWN, Adam, talk is cheap, including tough talk from fools like you – if you are going to haul Trump before your KANGAROO COURT, then get it done and quit the waffling and posturing for the TV cameras!

Getting back to the story:

Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, has declined to appear before the committee, or respond to the subpoena demanding documents and testimony, claiming executive privilege.

The committee will decide on Tuesday whether to make a criminal contempt referral to the full House of Representatives.

end quotes

And here we see the process that will have to play itself out if the WITCH HUNTERS vote to refer criminal contempt charges against Bannon – before they go to the Justice Department, the full house must vote to do so, and there is where this saga is going to become even more interesting with the debate in the full House over the criminal referral, and here, let us go for a second to the
Congressional Record – United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167, WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 No. 4, for the prayer that Nancy Pelosi had read that day as the session started, to wit:

PRAYER

The Chaplain, Reverend Margaret Grun Kibben, offered the following prayer:

O God, our refuge and our strength, a very present help in times of discord and trouble.

Mountains crumble, waters rage, nations roar, and yet we need not be afraid, for even now You abide with us in these times of great discord, uncertainty, and unrest.

We, who have pledged to defend our Constitution against all enemies, we pray Your hedge of protection around this Nation.

Defend us from those adversaries, both foreign and domestic, outside these walls and perhaps within these Chambers, who sow seeds of acrimony to divide colleagues and conspire to undermine trust in Your divine authority over all things.

The journey of this experiment in democracy is perilous and demanding, fraught with anger and discontent.

But wise rulers still seek You.

So help us, God, to find You in the midst of us.

So help us, God, to see Your gracious plan even in the events of these days.

So help us, God, to serve You and this Nation with Godliness and dignity.

We lay before You the gifts of our hopes, our dreams, our deliberations, and our debates, that You would be revealed and exalted among the people.

We pray these things in the strength of Your holy name.

Amen.

end quotes

Yes, people, GOD was there that day to make sure that Joe Biden became the next president, and the Republicans were conspiring to undermine trust in GOD’s divine authority over all things, and then there was an insurrection and coup and here we are today, back to the Guardian, to wit:

Kinzinger, an Illinois congressman who was one of 10 House Republicans to vote for Trump’s impeachment in January following the insurrection, also said that Joe Biden was right to call for the prosecution of those who resisted subpoenas.

end quotes

And as the annoited of GOD, wouldn’t that be Joe Biden’s perogative?

Getting back to Adam Kinzinger, who appears to be a WARRIOR OF GOD here, we have further as follows:

“The president has every right to signal, I think he has every right to make it clear where the administration stands.”

“God knows the prior administration every two hours was trying to signal to the justice department,” Kinzinger said, referring to Trump’s prolific pressuring of the DOJ.

“But that has to do with other pretty horrific things, and I think the president has made it clear that we need answers to this.”

“The vast majority of Americans agree, so this potential criminal contempt referral for Steve Bannon is the first shot over the bow.”

end quotes

I wonder when the movie comes out if they will have Brad Pitt playing the part of Adam Kinzinger.

Should be very exciting when it comes out!

A real blockbuster, so be sure to not miss it!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... ent-448019
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 20, 2021 AT 10:50 AM

Paul Plante says:

Axis Sally, Tokyo Rose and Jen Psaki!

What do they all have in common?

Mildred Elizabeth Gillars (November 29, 1900 – June 25, 1988), nicknamed “Axis Sally” along with Rita Zucca, was an American broadcaster employed by Nazi Germany to disseminate Axis propaganda during World War II.

Tokyo Rose was a name given by Allied troops in the South Pacific during World War II to all female English-speaking radio broadcasters of Japanese propaganda.

And Biden-ista Jen Psaki follows in their footsteps by disseminating CULT OF JOE propaganda here in the United States as she did just yesterday ( https://theglobalherald.com/news/trumps ... jen-psaki/ ) with her very ridiculous and absurd statement that Donald Trump posed a ‘unique and existential threat to our democracy,’ a statement so bizarre as to be totally unbelievable and which has American citizens who are not Biden or Psaki KOOL-AID DRINKERS now comparing Jen, America’s favorite bobble-head, to Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, known as “Baghdad Bob,” Saddam’s Minister of Information as the bobble-head Jen is Joe Biden’s MINISTER OF INFORMATION, who in March of 2003, like Jen today, was everybody’s favorite inadvertent comedian.

Sporting a kicky black beret and delightfully bombastic lexicon, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf appeared on TV daily to predict American failure and deny the Baghdad invasion — sometimes even as U.S. tanks appeared behind him.

“He’s great,” President George W. Bush said of Sahaf, admitting that he occasionally interrupted meetings to watch Sahaf’s briefings.

“Someone accused us of hiring him and putting him there.”

“He was a classic.”

And people, today, our very own Jen is also a classic with her line in response to Peter Doocy, the White House correspondent for Fox News, that “Well, since you give me the opportunity here, former President Trump used his office to incite an insurrection,” which idiotic statement is Bizarre Beyond Belief (BBB), given a Washington Examiner story sixty-one (61) days earlier, a story Jen apparently missed or disregarded since it did not agree with the BIDEN-ESQUE PROPAGANDA she is spewing, entitled “FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6” by Conn Carroll on 8/20/2021, where we had another completely different version of reality than the mythical horse**** Jen is spewing, to wit:

The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence”

By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, according to the FBI. Reuters reports:

The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

“Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation.

“Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized.”

“But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”

This report is a devastating blow to President Joe Biden and Democrats, who have attempted to make the existence of an “insurrection” on Jan. 6 a key issue in the 2022 midterm elections.

Reuters does note that some “cells of protesters,” including members of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, did coordinate to “break into the Capitol,” but the FBI found “no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside.”

The FBI has arrested 570 rioters and each and every one of them should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

But that is what the event was: a riot, just like so many other riots.

Trying to politicize it and turn it into something it wasn’t won’t make the Capitol any safer.

end quotes

But people, disregard that, because what Jen says is THE TRUTH, while everybody knows the FBI lies, which takes us back to “Baghdad Bob” who became the subject of T-shirts, mugs, adoring websites, a pop song, and an action figure.

Will our very own Jen achieve the greatness of a “Baghdad Bob” and herself became the subject of T-shirts, mugs, adoring websites, a pop song, and an action figure?

Will we see bobble-head dolls of Jen riding on the dashboards of American cars all over the nation right up there next to the Plastic Jesus?

I don’t care if it rains or freezes
Long as I got my plastic Jen
Riding on the dashboard of my car.

Through my trials and tribulations
And my travels through the nations
With my plastic Jen I’ll go far.
Plastic Jen plastic Jen,
Riding on the dashboard of my car

Plastic Jen doesn’t hear
‘Cause she has a plastic ear
Plastic Jen plastic Jen,
Riding on the dashboard of my car!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/o ... ent-448957
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 22, 2021 AT 10:52 AM

Paul Plante says:

And such it was to be!

The making of history, I mean, and that is in reference to the full house in the House of Representatives voting to send the matter of the alleged contumacious witness Steve Bannon, a private citizen, to the Justice Department for prosecution, a private citizen whom a shrill, shrieking and apparently hysterical Liz Cheney was quoted denouncing in an article in the Independent titled “Liz Cheney says Trump appears to have been ‘personally involved in planning’ 6 Jan insurrection – Bannon ‘appears’ to have had ‘substantial advance knowledge of the plans for January 6th’” by Namita Singh on 20 October 2021 as saying as follows:

Steve Bannon’s refusal to cooperate in the investigation of the 6 January Capitol riots suggests that former president Donald Trump “was personally involved in the planning and execution” of the insurrection, Liz Cheney said on Tuesday.

end quotes

And how absolutely boringly stupid and ridiculous this charade becomes, because there was NO INSURRECTION, and accordingly, since there was NO INSURRECTION, neither Trump nor Bannon could have been involved in the planning and execution of something the Federal Bureau of Investigation, an arm of the United States Department of Justice, says did not happen, except in the fevered imagination of the shrill, shrieking, hysterical Liz Cheney, who appears to be shooting for an award for most hysterical actress in a daytime sit-com soap opera, which takes us back to the Independent for more Liz, as follows:

Ms Cheney, who is the committee’s vice-chair and one of two Republicans serving on it, said their investigation has shown that Mr Bannon “appears” to have had “substantial advance knowledge of the plans for January 6th and likely had an important role in formulating those plans.”

“Mr Bannon was in the war room at the Willard on January 6th.”

” He also appears to have detailed knowledge regarding the President’s efforts to sell millions of Americans the fraud that the election was stolen,” said the Republican representative from Wyoming.

end quotes

Notice all the qualifiers, such as “also appears to have detailed knowledge.”

That is proof of exactly NOTHING – “appears to have!”

But we are dealing with rabid, fervent Democrats here, people, WITCH HUNTERS, and so, for them, that “appears to have” is good enough.

And there for the moment, I will rest.

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... ent-450283
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 24, 2021 AT 11:09 AM

Paul Plante says:

An interesting article, all the way around, but not actually factually correct, but hey, these days, who’s bothering anymore to count.

First of all, let us go to the authorizing resolution for the WITCH HUNTERS committee that Virginia’s tough-talking Elaine Luria is a member of, to wit:

H.Res.503 – Establishing the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.

117th Congress (2021-2022)

Sponsor: Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-12] (Introduced 06/28/2021)

In the House of Representatives, U. S., June 30, 2021.

Whereas January 6, 2021, was one of the darkest days of our democracy, during which insurrectionists attempted to impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election.

end quotes

Focus on the word “insurrectionists,” and then ask yourself what proof, what indisputable evidence Elaine Luria is possessed of, that proves beyond a doubt that anyone in Washington, D.C., including Steve Bannon, was an insurrectionist.

The answer is that she has none, but since we are dealing with DEMOCRATS here, actually, she doesn’t need proof, or evidence, anymore that Joe Stalin did back when.

Like Joe Stalin, these DEMOCRATS know who is naughty, they know who is nice, they know who is guilty of something, and who isn’t, and so, proof and evidence really are superfluous, which is really the way things should be in a DEMOCRAT DEMOCRACY, because it is the right thing to do.

And before the matter can go to the U.S. attorney, Nancy Pelosi has to certify the vote, but that’s just a detail.

What is important now isn’t anything that Elaine Luria has done herself – what is now important is how the DOJ is going to handle this, because now is when DUE PROCESS of law unavailable in the House of Representatives actually begins.

As to Congresswoman Luria’s statement that “(T)he U.S. Supreme Court has emphasized that the subpoena power is a ‘public duty, which every person within the jurisdiction of the Government is bound to perform when properly summoned,” focus on the key words “properly summoned.”

Was Steve Bannon properly summoned to appear before a KANGAROO COURT to testify about something that never happened, which was “insurrectionists” attempting to “impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election?”

And a corollary question as well, that being were the DEMOCRATS in the House of Representatives really following any kind of Constitutional mandate on 6 January 2021, or were they really, as the evidence in the Congressional Record indicates, burying OUR Constitution for once and for all as it is an impediment to their taking over all three branches of our national government so they can impose the FASCISM of ONE-PARTY RULE on us?

As to the term “properly summoned,” let us go to the United States Supreme Court in matter of BARENBLATT v. UNITED STATES (1959), MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivering the opinion of the Court, to wit:

The congressional power in question concerns the internal process of Congress in moving within its legislative domain; it involves the utilization of its committees to secure “testimony needed to enable it efficiently to exercise a legislative function belonging to it under the Constitution.” McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135, 160 .

end quotes

And going back to this phrase about “insurrectionists” attempting to “impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election” from the authorizing resolution for the WITCH HUNTERS committee, called “select” because Nancy Pelosi hand-picked or “selected” the members for their loyalty not to RULE OF LAW, not to the CONSTITUTION, but to Nancy herself, is it a valid legislative function belonging to Congress under OUR Constitution for Nancy Pelosi and her hand-picked WITCH HUNTERS loyal to her to pronounce American citizens guilty of serious crimes?

Going back to Barenblatt, we have further as follows:

Broad as it is, the power is not, however, without limitations.

Since Congress may only investigate into those areas in which it may potentially legislate or appropriate, it cannot inquire into matters which are within the exclusive province of one of the other branches of the Government.

Lacking the judicial power given to the Judiciary, it cannot inquire into matters that are exclusively the concern of the Judiciary.

Neither can it supplant the Executive in what exclusively belongs to the Executive.

And the Congress, in common with all branches of the Government, must exercise its powers subject to the limitations placed by the Constitution on governmental action, more particularly in the context of this case the relevant limitations of the Bill of Rights.

end quotes

CONGRESS AND NANCY PELOSI AND ELAINE LURIA AND ALL THE KING’S HORSES, AND ALL THE KING’S MEN CANNOT PASS LEGISLATION CONDEMNING AN AMERICAN CITIZEN FOR CRIMES THEY SAY THE CITIZEN COMMITTED WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF THE COMMISSION OF A CRIME, IN THIS CASE, INSURRECTION!

Which takes us back to Barenblatt once more as follows:

The congressional power of inquiry, its range and scope, and an individual’s duty in relation to it, must be viewed in proper perspective. McGrain v. Daugherty, supra; Landis, Constitutional Limitations on the Congressional Power of Investigation, 40 Harv. L. Rev. 153, 214; Black, Inside a Senate Investigation, 172 Harpers Monthly 275 (February 1936).

The power and the right of resistance to it are to be judged in the concrete, not on the basis of abstractions.

end quotes

And that to me sums up just about where we are right now in this matter of the DEMOCRAT MYTH, THE BIGGEST LIE EVER, that on 6 January 2021, “insurrectionists” attempted to “impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election.”

So, thanks to Elaine Luria, the game is now on, the ball is in the air, so there is still time to make a run to the frig for some snacks, and we’ll be right back after a word for station identification, so don’t touch that dial!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... s/#respond
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 25, 2021 AT 6:20 PM

Paul Plante says:

A HORNSWOGGLE (get the better of the American people by cheating or deception, as in “I mean to say we were hornswoggled!”), people, a GREAT BIG BAMBOOZLE (to deceive by underhanded methods; to confuse, frustrate, or throw off thoroughly or completely), that is what Virginia’s own Elaine Luria voted for in actuality with her vote in what has been a very transparent KANGAROO COURT to hold Steve Bannon in contempt of the KANGAROO COURT by not appearing before it, which is an effort on her part by her vote to try and give a patina of legitimacy to something that has absolutely no legitimacy whatsoever in a free country, that being a KANGAROO COURT that can condemn en mass thousands of American citizens whose names they do not even know as “insurrectionists,” a very serious criminal charge, based on nothing more than Nancy Pelosi declaring them to be insurrectionists in the CHARTER for the WITCH HUNTERS committee of which Virginia’s Elaine Luria is a rabid member.

The BIG BAMBOOZLE, of course, or the GREAT HORNSWOGGLE, are other names for the MASSIVE HUGE LIE being propagated by Democrats like Elaine Luria that on 6 January 2021 “insurrectionists” were attempting to “impede Congress’s Constitutional mandate to validate the presidential election” when in fact, according to the FACTUAL RECORD in the Congressional Record, what was really being validated was the GUTTING of OUR Constitution by the Democrats in the House of Representatives who delegated to Nancy Pelosi the choice of picking this nation’s next president.

What Virginia’s own Elaine Luria has voted for here is a SHOW TRIAL to keep us distracted from what really went on behind closed doors in the House of Representatives on 6 January 2021 after 1:00 PM when the joint session of Congress commenced when the members of the Senate led by Mike Pence as their president entered the Chamber of the House of Representatives, and the following exchange took place which set the tone for the adversarial process which resulted in the effective muzzling of the Republicans and the gutting of OUR Constitution that was to follow, to wit:

The joint session was called to order by the Vice President.

PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRIES

Mr. GRIFFITH (Republican U.S. Representative for Virginia’s 9th congressional district since 2011).

Mr. Vice President, parliamentary inquiry.

The VICE PRESIDENT.

The gentleman from Virginia will state his parliamentary inquiry.

Mr. GRIFFITH.

Mr. Vice President, in order to follow the Speaker’s instructions that only a limited number of people be on the floor, may I ask how one would make an objection or make a parliamentary inquiry in the future if you are not on the floor but in the gallery.

The VICE PRESIDENT.

Under section 18 of title 3, United States Code, debate is not permitted in the joint session.

Mr. GRIFFITH.

Further parliamentary inquiry.

Mr. Vice President, I am not attempting to debate.

I am trying to find out how a parliamentary inquiry or a parliamentary point of order would be made in following with the Speaker’s request that most of us not be on the floor.

How do you make one of those points of order when you don’t know what is going to happen later?

The VICE PRESIDENT.

Respectfully, the gentleman’s parliamentary inquiry constitutes debate, which is not permitted in the joint session under section 18 of title 3, United States Code.

Madam Speaker, Members of Congress, pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the United States, the Senate and House of Representatives are meeting in joint session to verify the certificates and count the votes of the electors of the several States for President and Vice President of the United States.

end quotes

And out of that beginning, we now have the MASSIVE HUGE LIE being propagated by the Democrats and their lapdogs in the media that the 2020 presidential election, in the words of Elaine Luria’s fellow Democrat WITCH HUNTER Zoe Lofgren in the joint session on 6 January 2021, was “the most secure election conducted in modern history,” to wit:

Madam Speaker, this day marks a crossroads for American democracy.

Those who object to the counting of the electoral college votes, which reflect the votes of the American people, want to substitute their preferences for the voters’ choice.

end quotes

And that is patently false, as a review of the actual record in the Congressional Register makes clear, but again, people, we are dealing with Democrats here and how they can twist the truth and facts is a wonder the behold.

Why the electoral votes were being objected to was made incandescently clear on the record on 6 January 2021 by Congressman Biggs of Arizona, to wit:

Mr. BIGGS.

Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the objection.

The SPEAKER.

The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. BIGGS.

Madam Speaker, I join the objection to counting votes of electors from my home State of Arizona, as well as Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Nevada, because election integrity is the heart of our American constitutional republic.

In a representative form of government, we must be able to trust that our elections accurately represent the will of the American voter.

This is the appropriate forum anticipated and provided for by our Founders to debate whether this election complied with the Constitution that we have all sworn to protect.

Every particular of the Constitution is to be protected, including Article II, Section 1.

The debate as to the legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential election has been suppressed by the left and its propagandists in the media until today.

State legislatures are required to determine the manner in which electors are chosen.

Arizona names its electors on the general election ballot and identifies what candidate those electors are required to vote for should that candidate obtain the majority of votes in the general election.

As part of the manner for determining electors, Arizona also establishes deadlines for voter registration.

The deadline has been in place for 30 years.

This year, that voter registration deadline was October 5.

Early voting commenced 2 days later.

Five days before the deadline, a group filed a lawsuit demanding that Arizona election officials not enforce the deadline.

The Federal District Court decided that since other States have a deadline later than Arizona’s and some even allow for registration when voting, that Arizona’s new deadline would be a time he chose, not the legislature’s timeline.

The appellate court effectively overturned the lower court ruling and noted that the Arizona deadline established by the State legislature was sound and appropriate and complied with the Constitution.

But the appellate court merely shortened the extension, the bypassing of the deadline to 10 days.

The appellate court, without legal justification, also decided that everyone who registered after the legal deadline, but before the deadline created by judicial fiat, could still vote.

Note that the Arizona legislature was no longer in control of determining the manner of appointing Presidential electors because the court had set a new deadline, even though the appellate court found the legislature’s deadline was constitutionally sound.

During that window, more than 32,000 voters registered in Maricopa County alone.

Here are copies of those voter registration records.

In going around the deadline set by the legislature, the court ignored the Arizona legislature’s obligation and right to direct the manner of choosing Presidential electors as set forth in Article II, Section 1.

As a consequence of that judicial usurpation, more than 32,000 people were allowed to unlawfully cast ballots in Arizona’s Presidential election in 2020.

The Arizona legislature seeks an independent audit of the election.

The Governor refuses now to call them into a special session.

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors has refused to comply with legislative subpoenas.

In Arizona, the people who control the evidence related to the election have done everything possible to prevent an independent audit directed by the legislature.

Arizonans have used the limited amount of records available to investigate the 2020 Presidential election.

Of a limited sample of 1,000 addresses of voters, they found 539 voters did not live at the addresses on the voter rolls.

Here is a stack of 1,000 declaration of affidavits supporting that.

I object to counting the votes of Arizona electors because the Federal
courts went around the legislatively constructed mechanism for choosing Arizona’s Presidential electors, allowing tens of thousands of voters to unlawfully cast votes.

The court usurped a key component of the Arizona legislature’s manner of selecting Presidential electors, thus violating Article II, Section 1.

The legislature is being obstructed in its efforts.

And what little evidence we have and what little information we have has produced this kind of evidence, which indicates a significant problem with the integrity of the Presidential election.

end quotes

Every story paints a picture, don’t it?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... ent-452583
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 26, 2021 AT 6:19 PM

Paul Plante says:

A GRAND FLIM-FLAM (swindle someone with a confidence game, as in “the American people were flimflammed out of their Constitution”), people, the SNOOKERING (trick, entice, or trap, as in “the American people were snookered by the Democrats into buying into a MASSIVE HUGE LIE about what really took place in the House of Representatives on 6 January 2021”) of America!

That is exactly what we, the American people are being presented with here.

We are to believe that somebody, in this case a clown named Steve Bannon who took legal advice from Donald Trump as to his supposed immunity from having to appear before the WITCH HUNTERS, which was a real slick way for him to set up a subsequent insanity plea, was a mastermind of an alleged “insurrection” on 6 January 2021, as if somebody who would take their legal advice from Donald Trump was a real master criminal mastermind capable to actually overthrowing the government of the United States of America, as opposed to a pure goose fool for taking legal advice from Donald Trump, and if there was even a hint of real evidence that Steve Bannon was actually responsible for setting up an insurrection on 6 January 2021, the FBI would have been all over him long before now.

And if a clown like Steve Bannon was really capable of overthrowing not only the whole national government of the United States of America, but our whole democracy, as well, just think how absolutely rotten and corrupt that overthrown government and democracy would have to be to be overthrown by Steve Bannon, and since Steve Bannon never did overthrow the United States government, I think the concept itself that Steve Bannon could overthrow the United States government as propounded by Congresswoman Luria is absurd and preposterous, BUT, what a powerful distraction that show has turned out to be for the Democrats who staged a SOFT COUP on 6 January 2021, and dealt our Constitution as death blow, as if it were Caesar under the knife of Brutus and his murderous gang of senators, where in our political lexicon, a SOFT COUP, sometimes referred to as a silent coup, is a coup d’état without the use of violence, but based on a conspiracy or plot that has as its objective the taking of state power by partially or wholly legal means, to facilitate an exchange of political leadership and in some cases also of the current institutional order.

Except in this case, the plot, for plot it definitely was, had as its objective the taking of state power by totally unconstitutional means to facilitate an exchange of political leadership as well as a sea change in the current institutional order, as we become a socialist worker’s paradise, as we can see by going back to an article in THE HILL entitled “Pelosi sets up call on election challenge: ‘No situation matches Trump presidency’” by Joseph Choi on 01/03/21, where we had as follows - the head plotter, Nancy Pelosi, discussing the plot with her fellow plotters in the Democrat party, to wit:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a Sunday letter told her Democratic colleagues they would discuss the process for expected challenges to the Electoral College results from House Republicans during a call on Monday.

“Over the years, we have experienced many challenges in the House, but no situation matches the Trump presidency and the Trump disrespect for the will of the people,” Pelosi wrote in her letter.

Pelosi outlined a plan for the Democratic lawmakers as they prepare to certify the Electoral College votes this week.

More than 100 House Republicans are expected to challenge the results of the election in various battleground states, and a dozen Senate Republicans have vowed to do so.

She said the result would end with President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris being “officially declared the next President and Vice President of the United States,” but acknowledged this declaration might have to take place in “the middle of the night.”

end quotes

And how right she was to be on all counts, which is a sign of both a good coup plotter, and a sound coup plan.

And in the meantime, while we are having our attention focused on what was taking place OUTSIDE the House of Representatives chamber on 6 January 2021, the real COUP was taking place INSIDE those very chambers, which is where our attention as LOYAL AMERICAN CITIZENS should really be focused, and thankfully, we have the Cape Charles Mirror to do that questioning in, because sadly, nowhere else in America is it even being considered, let alone actually happening by making direct reference to the Congressional Record for that day, which is the official record of what actually transpired that day in the House of Representatives, not what the Democrats intent on overthrowing our form of Republican government to replace it with ONE-PARTY RULE and a FASCIST system with the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi in charge and their lapdogs in the media say what happened.

Which takes us to this important existential elementary school civics question, to wit:

ON 6 JANUARY 2021, WERE CHALLENGES TO THE COUNTING OF ELECTORAL VOTES PERMITTED BY LAW IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

Where the Congressional Research Service, which serves the Congress throughout the legislative process by providing comprehensive and reliable legislative research and analysis that are timely, objective, authoritative, and confidential, thereby contributing to an informed national legislature in its bulletin titled “Counting Electoral Votes: An Overview of Procedures at the Joint Session, Including Objections by Members of Congress” updated December 8, 2020, in the Summary states that “The Constitution and federal law establish a detailed timetable following the presidential election during which time the members of the electoral college convene in the 50 state capitals and in the District of Columbia, cast their votes for President and Vice President, and submit their votes through state officials to both houses of Congress,” and “The electoral votes are scheduled to be opened before a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021,” and “Federal law specifies the procedures for this session and for challenges to the validity of an electoral vote,” and “This report describes the steps in the process and precedents set in prior presidential elections governing the actions of the House and Senate in certifying the electoral vote and in responding to challenges of the validity of electoral votes,” and in the section “Objecting to the Counting of One or More Electoral Votes” states that “Section 15 establishes a procedure for making and acting on objections to the counting of one or more of the electoral votes from a state or the District of Columbia,” and “When the certificate or equivalent paper from each state or the District of Columbia is read, ‘the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any,'” and “Any such objection must be presented in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative,” and “The objection ‘shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof,’” and “When an objection, properly made in writing and endorsed by at least one Senator and one Representative, is received, each house is to meet and consider it separately,” and “The statute states, ‘No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of,’” was it lawful and proper on 6 January 2021 for Republican members of congress and the Senate to challenge the electoral votes from the state of Arizona on Constitutional grounds?

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... ent-453261
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 27, 2021 AT 10:32 AM

Paul Plante says:

So what is the Congressional Record?

How do we know we can trust what is printed therein, when the same politicians, in this case Nancy Pelosi, are saying different things outside the House of Representatives than what the Congressional Record has them saying inside?

Like whether or not there was an “insurrection” on 6 January 2021?

Or what the actual purpose of that gathering of politicians at the Capitol was really all about on 6 January 2021, despite what any of OUR laws might have to say about it, or OUR Constitution, which really is no more?

According to the website of the U.S. Senate, we have as follows concerning the Congressional Record:

The Congressional Record is a substantially verbatim account of the remarks made by senators and representatives while they are on the floor of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

It also includes all bills, resolutions, and motions proposed, as well as debates, and roll call votes.

end quotes

Hmmmm.

So if the word “verbatim” means “in exactly the same words as were used originally,” then when the Congressional Record quotes Nancy Pelosi after the House was called to order by the Speaker at 9 o’clock and 2 minutes p.m. as saying “The Chair will address the Chamber,” and “Today, a shameful assault was made on our democracy,” and “We know that we are in difficult times, but little could we have imagined the assault that was made on our democracy today,” and “We will be part of a history that shows the world what America is made of, that this assault, this assault is just that,” did it really mean that Nancy was actually talking about an insurrection?

But if it is verbatim, then it would have had Nancy talking about an insurrection, would it not, and not merely an “assault?”

So, if it wasn’t an insurrection at a little after 9 P.M. on the evening of 6 January 2021, when exactly did it become an insurrection?

And what does the Congressional Record have to say about the purpose of the gathering in the Capitol that day?

Let’s look:

ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER

The SPEAKER.


The Chair will address the Chamber.

Today, a shameful assault was made on our democracy.

It cannot, however, deter us from our responsibility to validate the election of Joe Biden and KAMALA HARRIS.

For that reason, Congress has returned to the Capitol.

end quotes

And there it is in plain words right from the mouth of “BOSS” Nancy Pelosi, herself – the sole purpose of that empty ceremony on 6 January 2021 was to RUBBER STAMP Joe Biden’s alleged victory.

Despite anything to the contrary in OUR laws or OUR Constitution about challenging electors being both a right and a duty for our supposed “representatives,” Nancy said NO!

WHY?

Well, as the article in THE HILL entitled “Pelosi sets up call on election challenge: ‘No situation matches Trump presidency’” by Joseph Choi on 01/03/21 informed us, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a Sunday letter told her Democratic colleagues they would discuss the process for expected challenges to the Electoral College results from House Republicans during a call on Monday and Pelosi outlined a plan for the Democratic lawmakers as they prepared to certify the Electoral College votes that required each and every one of them to forsake their oaths to OUR Constitution and OUR laws, both very easy to do for a Democrat, because in the words of Nancy, “Over the years, we have experienced many challenges in the House, but no situation matches the Trump presidency and the Trump disrespect for the will of the people,” which situation demanded that OUR laws and OUR Constitution be set aside as being seriously flawed, given that those laws and that Constitution actually allowed Donald Trump to beat Barack Obama’s hand-picked successor and carrier-on of his Obama legacy, that being Hillary Clinton, and accordingly, those laws and OUR Constitution had to be set aside on 6 January 2021, because they might allow Trump to win again, something Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats were dead set against, so they RIGGED the system to not allow challenges, despite the law and the Constitution, so that in the words of Nancy in THE HILL on 3 January 2021, the result would end with President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris being “officially declared the next President and Vice President of the United States.”

And such was American history made, people!

From henceforth, ALL presidential elections are now to be determined by the DEMOCRATS in the House of Representatives who put Joe Biden into the White House by order of Nancy Pelosi.

Welcome to a brave NEW WORLD here in what used to be a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, but has now been reduced to a Democrat-controlled democracy instead.

And if you want to know what laws apply today, be sure to check the website of Nancy Pelosi where our marching orders for today telling us what to think and what not to think should be posted, and if they are not up yet, then DO NOT THINK AT ALL!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... ent-453652
thelivyjr
Site Admin
Posts: 73386
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:40 p

Re: Just musings, is all

Post by thelivyjr »

THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR OCTOBER 27, 2021 AT 10:55 PM

Paul Plante says:

And not only is the Congressional Record for 6 January 2021 interesting for what it does say, but also for what it does not say, which takes us back to a USA TODAY article entitled “Timeline: How a Trump mob stormed the US Capitol, forcing Washington into lockdown” by George Petras, Janet Loehrke, Ramon Padilla, Javier Zarracina and Jennifer Borresen on Jan. 15, 2021, where we had this following entry, to wit:

1:46 p.m.

Rep. Elaine Luria, D-Va., tweets she is being evacuated after reports of a pipe bomb outside.

“Supporters of the President are trying to force their way into the Capitol and I can hear what sounds like multiple gunshots.”

end quotes

All of which is interesting because the Congressional Record for 6 January 2021 is completely silent on that supposed “evacuation” of Congresswoman Luria at 1:46 P.M., when she made the “mystery TWEET” above mentioned.

Here is what the Congressional Record does have, to wit:

RECESS

The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. MCGOVERN).


Without objection, pursuant to clause 12(b) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess subject to the call of the Chair.

There was no objection.

Accordingly (at 2 o’clock and 18 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.

end quotes

At 1:46 P.M., this is who we had speaking that day:

Mr. GOSAR.

Madam Speaker, I rise in support of my objection.

The SPEAKER.

The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. GOSAR.

Madam Speaker, I filed my challenge on the slate of electors from the State of Arizona that was actually put forward by Governor Ducey of Arizona.

My ask to you, the Speaker, through the Vice President, is simple.

Do not count these electors until and unless the secretary of state allows a forensic audit of the election, a request she has denied repeatedly.

We have been told over and over that even though this was a public election using public money and public machines utilizing public employees, the public today has no ability to simply double-check the veracity of these results.

If the Presidential election was a football game, we would get a slow-motion review from multiple angles and a correction of a controversial decision.

But not so, we are told by our secretary of state, for the Presidential election, no review for you.

No access to the Dominion voting machines with a documented history of enabling fraud through its now discredited adjudication system, a system that literally allows one person to change tens of thousands of votes in mere minutes.

In the only audit done in Arizona, a court found 3 percent error rate against President Trump.

Vice President Biden’s margin of error was one-tenth of that, at 0.03 percent.

By the way, a 3 percent error rate at minimum is 90,000 ballots.

After finding the 3 percent error rate, the court stopped the audit and refused to go further.

In Arizona, as my attachments make clear, mail-in ballots were altered on the first day of counting as shown in data graphs we have provided, as concluded by data analysts.

Over 400,000 mail-in ballots were altered, switched from President Trump to Vice President Biden, or completely erased from President Trump’s totals.

The proof is in the counting curves, the curves that cannot occur except with odds so rare and unlikely that winning the Mega Millions lottery is more probable.

Mr. Speaker, can I have order in the Chamber?

end quotes

Now, that last sentence is also interesting, because he is obviously referring to some kind of disorder in the House that was not allowing him to be heard.

That disorder is logically linked to the Luria “mystery TWEET,” which was a signal, but to whom, and for what purpose, other than some purpose put in motion by Nancy Pelosi three days earlier on 3 January 2021, when she guaranteed to her Democrats that when 6 January 2021 was over, Joe Biden would be president.

And then, according to the Congressional Record, the proceedings resumed as follows:

AFTER RECESS

The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. MCGOVERN) at 2 o’clock and 29 minutes p.m.

The SPEAKER pro tempore.

The gentleman from Arizona (Mr. GOSAR) has 2 3⁄4 minutes remaining.

The gentleman may proceed.

Mr. GOSAR.

Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, the probability of these ectopic curves, you have a better likelihood of winning the Mega Millions lottery than you do having statistical issues here.

Over 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona using the Federal ballot, yet our secretary of state refused the public access to review the ballots.

Over a thousand residences were visited for proof of residency and address; 456 failed that test.

They were vacant lots.

Even the Recorder’s office was used as an address.

What are they hiding?

If the process was fair, these would be improbable.

These would be once-in-a-lifetime-type applications.

So let’s look at the ballots, the signatures, and the adjudicated records.

Until this is done, Mr. Speaker, we should not count this slate.

You have a letter from the Arizona Legislature stating its intent to review the issue on January 11.

Our Governor has refused to allow the State to properly convene to do its proper oversight.

Mr. Speaker, I ask you one question today: Are you a ceremonial figurehead in your current role, or did the drafters of the 12th Amendment and Congress, in the Electoral Count Act of 1887, envision a role where you made discretionary decisions about ballot fraud and fair elections?

If you are merely ceremonial, then let’s be done with this.

Let’s eat our tea and crumpets and witness our national decline.

But if you are not merely ceremonial but vested with discernment, rationality, and legal authority to not just count from 1 to 270, then do not accept Arizona’s electors as certified.

Remand the slate back to the secretary of state, back to the Governor, with the following instructions: Until a full, complete electoral forensic audit is allowed by the secretary of state, the electors currently certified will not be counted.

It will then fall on the State of Arizona to decide are its electors in the game or not.

Anything less is an abdication of our constitutional Republic and our ethos: one man, one vote.

We ask: Why?

What is there to hide?

Shouldn’t the lawful victor of an election be proud, open, and transparent about an election audit?

I would.

Instead, we are met with denials, cover-ups, and contempt of subpoenas.

There is too much evidence of fraud, demonstrated by statistical anomalies that experts have determined cannot happen in the absence of fraud, to accept such a slate.

I am not asking these electors never be counted; it is just that they need to be certified the proper way.

Our beloved Constitution is but a mere piece of paper if we do not follow the law, upholding the law.

But now, alas, we find ourselves lawless, destroying the very thread that binds us together.

But we need to get back to the rule of law.

That is what has been violated, truly, by the actions in these States.

RECESS

The SPEAKER pro tempore.


Without objection, pursuant to clause 12(b) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess subject to the call of the Chair.

There was no objection.

Accordingly (at 2 o’clock and 29 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.

end quotes

So Congressman Gosar’s concerns simply went under the rug, it would appear.

And why didn’t the Congressional Record reflect the fact that Congresswoman Luria was being evacuated at 1:46 P.M.?

A lingering mystery for our times today!

http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/r ... ent-453914
Post Reply